Assessing the Productivity of Old English –læcan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20119283Keywords:
Old English, frequency, productivity, dictionary, corpusAbstract
The aim of this paper is to analyse the productivity of the Old English weak verbs suffixed with -læcan. The main sources for this research are the lexical database of Old English Nerthus and The Dictionary of Old English Corpus. The assessment of productivity is based on the distinction between type-frequency (dictionary-based) and token-frequency (corpus-based). This work contributes to a methodology for assessing the productivity of a morphological process in a historical language as well as for dealing with very low indexes of productivity. The conclusion is reached that the type-frequency of -læcan is relatively high, whereas its productivity is considerably low. It may be affirmed then that a type-frequency higher than token-frequency is compatible with a rather unproductive affix. Finally, the analysis evidences that -læcan suffixed verbs are much more frequent in prose and glosses than in poetry.
Downloads
References
Aronoff , Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Baayen, Harald. 1989. A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity. Doctoral dissertation. Free University of Amsterdam.
—. 1992. “Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity”, in Geert Booij– Jaap van Marle (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 109-149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
—. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Geert Booij, Jaap van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 181-208.
Baayen, Harald and Rochelle Lieber. 1991. “Productivity and English derivation: a corpusbased study”. Linguistics 29: 801-843.
Baayen, Harald and Antoinette Renouf. 1996. “Chronicling The Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper”. Language 72: 69-96.
Bauer, Laurie 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—. 2004. A Glossary of Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. —. 2005. “Productivity: Theories”. In Stekauer, Pavol and Rochelle Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Springer.
Bosworth, Joseph and Thomas N. TOLLER. 1973 (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark Hall, John R. 1996 (1896). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús, Ana Díaz-Negrillo and Pavol Stekauer. 2007. “How is low morphological productivity measured?”. Atlantis 29.1: 29-54.
Fischer, Olga. 2008. “On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization”. Studies in Language 32.2: 336-382.
Givón, Talmy. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Healey, A., diPaolo, J. Price Wilkin and X. Xiang (eds.) 2004. The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
Hopper, Paul and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003 (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jember, G.K. et al. 1975. English-Old English, Old English-English Dictionary. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1986. “Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: from stem formation to word-formation”. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.) Historical Semantics-Historical Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 221-261.
—. 1989. “Typological Changes in the History of English Morphology”. In Fries, U. and M. Heusser (eds.) Meaning and Beyond. Ernst Leisi zum 70. Geburstag. Tübingen: 281-293.
—. 1990. “The typological status of Old English Word Formation”. In S. Adamson, V. Law, N. Vincent and S. Wright (eds.) Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 205-224.
—. 1992. “Semantics and vocabulary”. In Hogg, Richard (ed.) The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 290-408.
—. 2005. “Conversion and/on zero: word formation theory, historical linguistics, and typology”. In Bauer, Laurie and Varela, Salvador (eds.) Approaches to Conversion/ Zero Derivation. Münster: Waxmann: 31-50.
—. 2006. “Typological Changes in Derivational Morphology”. In Van Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou (eds.) The Handbook of The History of English. Oxford: Blackwell: 151-177.
Lass, Roger 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. “Myths and the prehistory of grammars”. Journal of Linguistics 38: 113-136.
Lindemann, J.W. Richard. 1970. Old English Preverbal Ge-: Its Meaning. Charlottesville: Virginia University Press.
Martín Arista, Javier. 2005. “Ge- and the descriptive power of Nerthus”. Journal of English Studies 5-6: 209-231.
—. 2006. “Alternations, relatedness and motivation: Old English A-”. In Guerrero Medina, Pilar and Estela Martínez Jurado (eds.) Where Grammar Meets Discourse: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Córdoba: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba: 113-132.
—. 2008. “Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology”. In Van Valin, Robert D. (ed.) Investigations of the Syntax- Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 119-145.
—. 2009. “A Typology of Morphological Constructions”. In Butler, Christopher and Javier Martín Arista (eds.) Deconstructing Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 85-115.
—. 2010a. “OE strong verbs derived from strong verbs”. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7-1: 36-56.
—. 2010b. “Lexical negation in Old English”. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution 60/61: 89-108.
—. 2010c. “Building a lexical database of Old English: issues and landmarks”. In Considine, John (ed.) Current projects in historical lexicography. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 1-33.
—. 2011a. “Projections and Constructions in Functional Morphology: The Case of Old English HRĒOW”. Language and Linguistics 12(2): 393-425.
—. 2011b. “Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English”. English Studies 92(3): 323-344.
—. 2011c. “Morphological relatedness and zero alternation in Old English”. In Butler, Christopher and Pilar Guerrero Medina (eds.) Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. London: Equinox.
—. Forthcoming-a. “Parasynthesis in Old English word-formation”.
—. Forthcoming-b. “Old English Lexical Primes: Corpus Analysis and Database Compilation”. In Vázquez, Nila (ed.) Creation and Use of Historical Linguistic Corpora in Spain. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
—. Forthcoming-c. “The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal”.
Mateo Mendaza, Raquel. Forthcoming-a. “The Old English Adjectival suffixes Cund and -isc: textual occurrences and productivity”.
—. Forthcoming-b. “The Old English Adjectival affixes -ful and ful-: a text-based account on productivity”.
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quirk, Randolph and Charles L Wrenn. 1994. An Old English Grammar. London: Methuen.
Sweet, Henry. 1976 (1896). The Student´s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Gema Maíz Villalta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
