Modals and Modality in English

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199511682

Abstract

Modality as a linguistic notion has a clear expression in English through the use of different modal verbs. In this respect, we can approach this fact from both a diachronic and a synchronic perspective. In the development of modals in time, it is interesting to consider Bernd Heine's account, for whom modals' development should be considered within a process of grammaticalization and desemantization of full verbs, fully explainable in cognitive terms. From a synchronic point of view, modality as is expressed by English modals should be viewed in connection with tense and aspect. A convenient way of visualizing the interplay that takes place is the use of Minkowsky's space-time cones, which are presented here with examples illustrating the usefulness of this model for the description of these grammatical notions in an integrated manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

VAN BENTHEM, J. 1988. A Manual of Intensional Logic. Stanford: CSLI.

DIK, S. C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.

DIK, S. C., and K. HENGEVELD. 1990. "The Hierarchical Structure of the Clause and the Typology of Perception Verb Complements". WPFG 37. Amsterdam: U of Amsterdam.

DIRVEN, R. 1989. "Cognitive Linguistics and Pedagogic Grammar". In Linguistic Theorizing and Grammar Writing. Ed. G. Leitner and G. Graustein. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 56-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111354590.56

FOLEY, W. A., and R. D. VAN VALIN. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

GIVÓN, T. 1984. Syntax. A Functional-typological Introduction. Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17

- - -. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

GOLDBLATT, R. 1980. "Diodorean Modality in Minkowski Space-Time". Studia Logica 39: 219-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370321

HEINE, B. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083873.001.0001

HENGEVELD, K. 1987. "Clause Structure and Modality in Functional Grammar". In Ins and Outs of the Predication. Ed. Johan van der Auwera and Louis Goossens. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882278-005

- - -. 1989. "Layers and Operators". Journal of Linguistics 25: 127-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012123

KUCZAJ, S. A., and M. J. DALY. 1979. "The Development of Hypothetical Reference in the Speech of Young Children". Journal of Child Language 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002543

LANGACKER, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford UP.

- - -. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford UP.

PALMER, F. 1979. Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.

- - -. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

REICHENBACH, H. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Academic Press.

SHEPHERD, S. 1981. Modals in Antiguan Creole, Child Language Acquisition, and History. PhD. dissertation. Stanford.

SIEWIERSKA, A. 1991. Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.

SWEETSER, E. E. 1982. "Root and Epistemic Modals: Causality in Two Worlds". Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 484-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v8i0.2049

- - -. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure (Chapter 3: "Modality"). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

TWADDELL, W. F. 1963. The English Verb Auxiliaries. Providence (RI): Brown UP.

Downloads

Published

1995-12-31

Issue

Section

ARTICLES: Language and linguistics

How to Cite

Inchaurralde Besga, C. (1995). Modals and Modality in English. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 16, 165-188. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199511682