The Battle of Maldon y St. Edmund. Una aproximación pragmática desde la teoría de la cortesía lingüística

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199411738

Abstract

This paper analyses, from the standpoint of the literary pragmatics, and more specifically from linguistic politeness theory, two Old English texts: the heroic poem The Battle of Maldon and Aelfric's prose narrative of King Edmund's life. The aim is double: first, to show that this type of linguistic analysis is adequate for the study of texts from other historical periods, since the pragmatical focus on the text opens up a new interpretive and evaluative dimension. Second, to validate the applicability of politeness theory as an analytical framework in texts and contexts where it has not been commonly applied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BLAKE, N. 1965. "The Battle of Maldon". Neophilologus 332-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01514844

- - -. 1978. "The Genesis of The Battle of Maldon". ASE 7: 119-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263675100002891

BROWN, P., y S. LEVINSON. 1978. "Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena". En Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Ed. E. N. Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 56-289.

- - -. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals of Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

CLARK, C. 1983. "On Dating the Battle of Maldon. Certain Evidence Reviewed". NMS 27: 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.NMS.3.107

CLARK, G. 1968. "The Battle of Maldon: A Heroic Poem". Speculum 52-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2854798

CROSS, J. E. 1974. "Mainly on Philology and the Interpretative Criticism of Maldon". Old English Studies in Honour of John C. Pope. Toronto. 235-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442632714-015

GARCES CONEJOS, P. 1991. "Cuarta visita a The Chaser: Respuesta Pragmática a Sopher, Deyes y Barry". Miscel.lània Homenatge Enrique García Díez. Valencia: Universitat de

València, Conselleria de Cultura, Educació i Ciència de la Generalitat Valenciana. 355-365.

GENETTE, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

GNEUSS, H. 1976. "The Battle of Maldon 89: Byrthtnoth's ofermod Once Again". SP 73: 117-37.

GRICE, P.H. 1975. "Logic and Conversation". En Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3. Ed. P. Cole y J. L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press.

LABOV, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P.

McKINNELL, J. 1975. "On the Date of the Battle of Maldon". MÆ 44: 121-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/43628102

PARKS, W. 1986. "Flyting and Fighting: Pathways in the Realization of the Epic Contest". Neophilologus 292-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553323

SCRAGG, D. ed. 1991. The Battle of Maldon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

SELL, R. 1985a. "Tellability and Politeness in 'The Miller's Tale': First Steps in Pragmatics". English Studies 66: 496-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138388508598414

- - -. 1985b. "Politeness in Chaucer: Suggestions Towards a Methodology for Pragmatic Stylistics". Studia Neophilologica 57-2: 175-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393278508587918

- - -. 1989. "The Politeness of Literary Texts: A Literary Pragmatic Dimension". Ponencia presentada en el congreso de IAUPE en Lausanne.

SKEAT, W. W., ed. 1966. Ælfric´s Lives of Saints. Oxford: Oxford UP (EETS).

SHIPPEY, T. A. 1985. "Boar and Badger: An Old English Antithesis? Leeds Studies in English 220-39.

SPERBER , D., y D. WILSON. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

STUART, H. 1982. "The Meaning of Maldon". Neophilologus 66: 126-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01993680

SWANTON, M. J. 1968. "The Battle of Maldon: A Literary Caveat". JEGP 67: 431-450.

TOLKIEN, J. R. R. 1953. "The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth, Beorhthelm´s Son". Essays and Studies1-18.

Downloads

Published

1994-12-31

Issue

Section

ARTICLES: Language and linguistics

How to Cite

Garcés Conejos, P., & Fernández Cuesta, J. (1994). The Battle of Maldon y St. Edmund. Una aproximación pragmática desde la teoría de la cortesía lingüística. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 15, 235-262. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199411738