Knowable Conspiracies: Ideology and Form in Jonathan Franzen’s The Twenty-Seventh City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20157201Keywords:
Jonathan Franzen, critical reception, postmodernist novel, realism, ideologyAbstract
The narrative work of American novelist Jonathan Franzen has undeniably been neglected by academic criticism, a circumstance which is even more evident as regards his early fiction. It is the case that a significant part of such (scarce) critical attention as there is has focused on political questions and has generally dismissed Franzen’s professedly progressive engagement as unsound and counter-productive. This article departs from that reception —to which it acknowledges a point— and seeks to complement it by providing a wider ideological analysis of Franzen’s first novel. With this aim, we relate the novel to its specific historical and cultural context and we explore its Utopian content in the light of Jameson’s theory of narrative. In addition, we address the political import inherent in the particular novelistic form used by Franzen, a process which involves questioning the generally accepted accounts of Franzen’s stylistic evolution from postmodernism to realism.
Downloads
References
Annesley, James. 2006. “Market Corrections: Jonathan Franzen and the ‘Novel of Globalization’”. Journal of Modern Literature 2 (29): 111-28.
Antrim, Donald, Jonathan Franzen. 2001. “Interview with Jonathan Franzen”. Bomb 77. <http://www.bomsite.com/franzen/franzen.htm>. Accessed March 25, 2014.
Badiou, Alain. 2001. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Trans. P. Hallward. London and New York: Verso.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck. Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Trans. M. Ritter. London: Sage.
Brooks, Peter. 2005. Realist Vision. New Haven: Yale U.P.
Burn, Stephen J. 2008. Jonathan Franzen at the End of Postmodernism. London and New York: Continuum.
Callinicos, Alex. 2004. Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
Debord, Guy. (1988) 2002. Comments on the Society of the Spectacle. Trans. M. Imrie. London and New York: Verso.
Eagleton, Terry. 2003. “Porkchops and Pineapples”. Rev. of Mimesis, by Erich Auerbach. London Review of Books 20 (25): 17-19. Accessed March 25, 2014.
Franzen, Jonathan. (1988) 2010. The Twenty-Seventh City. New York: Noonday-Farrar.
—. (1992) 2007. Strong Motion. New York: Picador-Farrar.
—. 1996. “Perchance to Dream: In The Age of Images, a Reason to Write Novels”. Harper’s Magazine April issue: 35-54.
—. (2001) 2010. The Corrections. New York: Picador-Farrar.
—. 2002. How to Be Alone. New York: Picador.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Hawkins, Ty. 2010. “Assessing the Promise of Jonathan Franzen’s First Three Novels: A Rejection of ‘Refuge’”. College Literature 4(37): 61-87.
Hutcheon, Linda. 1988. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. London and New York: Routledge.
—. 1994. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London and New York: Routledge.
Hutchinson, Colin. 2009. “Jonathan Franzen and the Politics of Disengagement”. Critique 2(50): 191-205.
Jameson, Fredric. 1991 Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.
—. 1994. The Seeds of Time. New York: Columbia U.P.
—. (1981) 2002. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
—. 2007. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and other Science Fictions. London and New York: Verso.
—. 2013. The Antinomies of Realism. London and New York: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto. (1996) 2007 Emancipation(s). London and New York: Verso.
Leclair, Tom. 1987. In the Loop: Don DeLillo and the Systems Novel. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Lukács, Georg. (1957) 2006. The Meaning of Contemporary Realism. Monmouth, UK: The Merlin Press.
Martín Salván, Paula. 2013. “‘Longing on a Large Scale’: Models of Communitarian Reconstitution in Don DeLillo’s Fiction”. In Martín Salván, P., J. Jiménez Heffernan, and G. Rodríguez Salas (eds.) Community in Twentieth- Century Fiction. London: Palgrave: 218-237.
Mclaughlin, Robert L. 2004. “Post-Postmodern Discontent: Contemporary Fiction and the Social World”. Symploke 1-2 (12): 53-68.
Moretti, Franco. (1987) 2000. The Way of the World: The Bildungsroman in European Culture. Trans. A. Sbragia. London and New York: Verso.
Parrish, Timothy. 2010. “Tribal Politics and the Postmodern Product”. American Literary History 3 (22): 645-656.
Rebein, Robert. 2007. “Turncoat: Why Jonathan Franzen Finally Said ‘No’ to Po-Mo”. In Toth, J. (ed.) The Mourning After: Attending the
Wake of Postmodernism. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 201-21.
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
Ribbat, Christoph. 2002. “Handling the Media, Surviving The Corrections: Jonathan Franzen and the Fate of the Author”. Amerikastudien/American Studies 4 (47): 555-66.
Williams, Raymond. 1973. The Country and the City. New York: Oxford U.P.
Zizek, Slavoj. 2008. In Defense of Lost Causes. London and New York: Verso.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Jesús Blanco Hidalga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
