Richard Ford's Frank Bascombe as an American Everyman

Authors

  • Rubén Peinado Abarrio Universidad de Oviedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20148780

Keywords:

Cultural identity, National myths, Americanness, Contemporary narrative, US literature

Abstract

The autodiegetic narrator of Richard Ford’s Frank Bascombe trilogy –The Sportswriter (1986), Independence Day (1995) and The Lay of the Land (2006)– has been labelled by critics and commentators as a US everyman. Likewise, the character itself self-fashions as a common person able to embody significant cultural ideals and myths associated with the culture and history of the United States. Based on these considerations, the present article discusses and questions the representative qualities of this epitome of a mainstream version of Americanness. Frank Bascombe is a white, male, heterosexual, middle-class citizen in a regionally, ethnically and culturally diverse nation. Therefore, his self-assigned role as a common person repeatedly clashes with the social reality of the United States and at the same time leaves him yearning for a strong personality of his own.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERCOVITCH, Sacvan. 1975. The Puritan Origins of the American Self. New Haven and London: Yale U.P.

BONETTI, Kay. (1986) 2001. “An Interview with Richard Ford”. In Guagliardo, Huey (ed.) Conversations with Richard Ford. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press: 21-38.

BOORSTIN, Daniel J. 1965. The Americans: The National Experience. New York: Vintage.

CHERNECKY, William G. 2000. “‘Nostalgia Isn’t What It Used to Be’: Isolation and Alienation in the Frank Bascombe Novels”. In Guagliardo, Huey (ed.) Perspectives on Richard Ford. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press: 157-76.

DUFFY, Brian. 2008. Morality, Identity and Narrative in the Fiction of Richard Ford. Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.

FORD, Richard. 1986. The Sportswriter. London: Bloomsbury.

—. 1995. Independence Day. London: The Harvill Press.

—. 2006. The Lay of the Land. London: Bloomsbury.

—. 2009. “Nobody’s Everyman”. Bookforum April/May 2009. <http://www.bookforum.com/inprint/016_01/3512>. Accessed December 18, 2012.

—. 2002. “How does being an American Inform What I Write?” Writers on America. Office of International Programs, US Department of State. . Accessed 18 December, 2012.

FUKUYAMA, Francis. 2012. “The Future of History”. Foreign Affairs 91 (1). . Accessed December 22, 2012.

GOODER, R.D. 1998. “Introduction”. In James, Henry. The Bostonians. Edited with an Introduction and Notes by R.D. Gooder. New York and Oxford: Oxford U.P.: vii-xxxiii.

GORNICK, Vivian. 2008. The Men in My Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

GUAGLIARDO, Huey. 2000. “The Marginal People in the Novels of Richard Ford”. In Guagliardo, Huey (ed.) Perspectives on Richard Ford. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press: 3-32.

—. 2001. “Introduction”. In Guagliardo, Huey (ed.) Conversations with Richard Ford. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press: vii-xii.

HOFFMAN, Alice. 1986. “A Wife Named X, a Poodle Named Elvis”. The New York Times. 23 March 1986: 14.

KIMMEL, Michael S. 2000. The Gendered Society. New York: Oxford U.P.

—. 2006. Manhood in America: A Cultural History. New York and Oxford: Oxford U.P.

LIPSTIZ, George. 2001. American Studies in a Moment of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

MORRISON, Toni. 1992. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. New York: Vintage.

SCOTT, A.O. 2006. “Intimations of Mortality”. The New York Times. 29 October 2006.<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/books/review/Scott.t.html?pagewanted=all>. Accessed December 21, 2012.

ZINN, Howard. (1980) 1995. A People’s History of the United States: 1492–Present. New York: Harper Perennial.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-19

How to Cite

Peinado Abarrio, R. (2014). Richard Ford’s Frank Bascombe as an American Everyman. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 50, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20148780

Issue

Section

ARTICLES: Literature, film and cultural studies