Syntactic and Semantic Rules in Old English Adjective Formation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20129259Keywords:
morphological operation, Process and Paradigm Model, Syntactic rules, Semantic rules, Old EnglishAbstract
The aim of this journal article is to offer a paradigmatic analysis of the formation of adjectives by means of affixation in Old English. More specifically, the focus is on the change of meaning attributable to the processes of word-formation that turn out affixal adjectives. In a paradigmatic model, the formal modification of stems maps onto semantic and/or syntactic modifications, which are couched in terms of semantic and syntactic rules. After an analysis of the semantic and syntactic rules that apply in the formation of 3,365 derived adjectives, two conclusions are reached. In the first place, 19 prefixes out of 56 perform one derivational function, as opposed to 21 suffixes out of a total of 51, which means that the degree of polysemy displayed by prefixes is slightly higher than that of suffixes. Secondly, only two derivational functions are realized by one affix, which also shows that a one-to-one correspondence between affixes and derivational functions is the exception rather than the rule.
Downloads
References
Beard, Robert and Mark Volpe. 2005. “Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology”. In Stekauer, Pavoland Rochelle Lieber (eds.) Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer: 189- 205.
Bosworth, Joseph and Thomas Northcote Toller.(1898) 1973. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary and Supplement.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brinton, Laurel and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark Hall, John R. 1996. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary and Supplement. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Cortés Rodríguez, Francisco and Javier Martín Arista. “From directionals to telics: meaning construction, word-formation and grammaticalization in RRG”. In Gómez González, Miguel Ángel, Francisco Gonzálvez García and Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.) Form and function in language: Functional, cognitive and applied perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: Forthcoming.
De la Cruz Cabanillas, Isabel. 2007. “Semantic primes in Old English: a preliminary study of descriptors”. SELIM 14: 37-58.
Dik, Simon. (1989) 1997a.The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. (Ed. by Kees Hengeveld). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
—. 1997b. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. (Ed. by Kees Hengeveld). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ettmüller, Ludwig. (1851)1968. An Analytic Dictionary of English Etymology. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Guarddon Anelo, María del Carmen. 2009a. “Un análisis de las propiedades combinatorias de los primitivos semánticos a través de las adposiciones complejas en inglés antiguo”. Revista Española de Lingüística 39/2: 93-122.
—. 2009b. “The Natural Semantic Metalanguage of Old English Compound Adpositions”. English Studies30: 61-84.
Healey, Antoinette di Paolo. 2003. The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A-F. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
Hengeveld, Kees and Lachlan Mackenzie, J. 2008.Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holthausen, Ferdinand. 1963. Altenglischesetymologysches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1986. “Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: from stemformation to word-formation”. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.) Historical Semantics-Historical Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 221-261.
Orel, Vladimir. 2003. A Handbook of Germanic Etymology. Leiden: Brill.
Pounder, Amanda. 2000. Processes and Paradigms in Word-Formation Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sweet, Henry. 1976. The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Torre Alonso, Roberto, Javier Martín Arista, Ana Ibáñez Moreno, Elisa González Torres and Laura Caballero González. 2008. “Fundamentos empíricos y metodológicos de una base de datos léxica de la morfología derivativa del inglés antiguo”. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 3: 129-144.
Torre Alonso, Roberto. 2009. Morphological Process Feeding in the Formation of Old English Nouns: Zero Derivation, Affixation and Compounding. PhD Dissertation, Department of Modern Languages, University of La Rioja.
—. 2010. “Morphological process feeding in the formation of Old English nouns”. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7: 57-69.
—. 2011a. “The Morphological Structure of Old English Complex Nouns”. ATLANTIS 33/1: 127-146.
—. 2011b. “Nominal Affix Combinations in Old English: Distribution and Restrictions”. RESLA 24: 257-278.
—. “Recursive suffixation in the formation of Old English nouns”. In Martín Arista, Javier, Roberto Torre Alonso, Andrés Canga Alonso and Inmaculada Medina Barco (eds.) Convergent Approaches on Mediaeval English Language and Literature. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars: Forthcoming.
Van Valin, Robert. 2005. Exploring the Syntax- Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—. and Randy Lapolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Raquel Vea Escarza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
