The Effect of Prominence Hierarchies on Modern English Long Passives: Pragmatic vs. Syntactic Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20109295Keywords:
passive voice, Modern English, word order, discourse status, syntactic complexityAbstract
This paper examines the effect of the most relevant crosslinguistic prominence hierarchies on long passives (or passives with an overt by-phrase), in order to identify the factors which condition their choice over actives as order-rearranging strategies in Modern English (1500-1900). With empirical data drawn from the Helsinki Corpus and ARCHER, I will study the effect of (i) familiarity hierarchies, such as given-before-new or definite-before-indefinite, (ii) dominance hierarchies, like the animacy, empathy and semantic role hierarchies, and (iii) formal hierarchies such as short-before-long. The analysis reveals a clear predominance of pragmatic and syntactic factors, namely discourse status (given-before-new) and structural complexity (short-before-long), both of which facilitate utterance planning, production and parsing. Despite the apparent correlation between these two factors, this paper also shows that they are independent and that, when in competition, discourse status is a more powerful factor than syntactic complexity.
Downloads
References
ALTENBERG, Bengt. 1982. The Genitive vs. the of- Constructions: A Study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.
ARNOLD, Jennifer E., Thomas WASOW, Anthony LOSONGCO and Ryan GINSTROM. 2000. “Heaviness vs. Newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering”. Language 76/1: 28-55.
BIBER, Douglas, Edward FINEGAN and Dwight ATKINSON. 1994. “ARCHER and its Challenges: Compiling and exploring A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers”. In Fries, Udo, Gunnel Tottie and P. Schneider (eds.) Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 1-14.
BIRNER, Betty J. and Gregory WARD. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English (Studies in Language Companion Series, 40). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
BRESNAN, Joan, Shipra DINGARE and Chris MANNING. 2001. “Soft Constraints mirror Hard Constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi”. In Butt, Miriam and Tracy H. King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Draft on-line, Stanford University: http://csli-publications. stanford.edu/.
CHAFE, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
COMRIE, Bernard. (1981), 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.
HAWKINS, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KENNEDY, Graeme. 2001. “The distribution of agent making and finiteness as possible contributors to the difficulty of passive voice structures”. In Aijmer, Karen (ed.) A wealth of English Studies in honour of Göran Kjellmer (Gothenberg studies in English, 81). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis: 39-46.
KISS, Katalin É. 1998. “Discourse-Configurationality in the Languages of Europe”. In Siewierska, Anna (ed.) Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 681-727.
KUNO, Susumu and Etsuko KABURAKI. 1977. “Empathy and Syntax”. Linguistic Enquiry, 8: 627-673.
KYTÖ, Merja. (1991), 1993. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English texts. Helsinki: Department of English.
LAMBRECHT, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NIV, Michael. 1992. “Right Association Revisited”. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Newark, Delaware. June 28-July 02, 1992.
PRINCE, Ellen F. 1992. “The ZPG Letter: Subject, Definiteness and Information-Status”. In Thompson, Sandra A. and William C. Mann (eds.) Discourse Description: Diverse analyses of a fund raising text. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 295-325.
QUIRK, Randolph, Sidney GREENBAUM, Geoffrey LEECH and Jan SVARTVIK. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
ROSENBACH, Anette. 2002. Genitive Variation in English. Conceptual factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies (Topics in English Linguistics, 42). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
ROSENBACH, Anette. 2005. “Animacy versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English”. Language, 81/3: 613-644.
SEOANE, Elena. 2006. “Information Structure and Word Order: The passive as an information rearranging strategy”. In van Kemenade, Ans and Bettelou Los (eds.) Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell: 360-391.
—. 2009. “Syntactic Complexity, Discourse Status and Animacy as Determinants of Grammatical variation in Modern English”. English Language and Linguistics, 13/3: 365-384.
SEOANE, Elena and Christopher WILLIAMS. 2006. “Changing the Rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse”. In Dossena, Marina and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.) Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-Specific English. Bern: Peter Lang: 255-276.
SIEWIERSKA, Anna 1994. “Word Order and Linearization”. In Asher, R. E. and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9. Oxford: Pergamon: 4993-4999.
SILVERSTEIN, M. 1976. “Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity”. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.) Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies: 112-171.
SÖDERLIND, Johannes. 1951-58. Verb Syntax in John Dryden’s Prose (2 Vols.) Uppsala: Lundquitska Bokhandeln.
SORNICOLA, Rosanna. 2006. “Interaction of Syntactic and Pragmatic factors on Basic Word order in the Languages of Europe”. In Bernini, Giuliano and Marcia L. Schwartz (eds.) Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 357-544.
STRANG, Barbara M. H. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen.
SVARTVIK, Jan. 1996. On Voice in the English Verb. The Hague: Mouton and Co.
WASOW, Thomas. 1997. “Remarks on Grammatical Weight”. Language Variation and Change, 9: 81-105.
—. 2002. Postverbal Behavior. Stanford, Ca: CSLI Publications.
WASOW, Thomas and Jennifer ARNOLD. 2003. “Post-verbal constituent ordering in English”. In Rohdenburg, Günter and Britta Mondorf (eds.) Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 119-154.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Elena Seoane
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
