Viceroy’s House: Discerning Who the Victors Are

Authors

  • E. Guillermo Iglesias-Díaz University of the Balearic Islands image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.202611623

Keywords:

diaspora, hybridity, herstory, situated knowledge, self-conscious film narrative

Abstract

Gurinder Chadha’s 2017 film Viceroy’s House opens with the quote attributed to Winston Churchill, “History is written by the victors”. With this provocative beginning, Chadha seems to aim for a strong reaction and, indeed, a review of the critical response to the film suggests that Chadha garnered attention from voices on all sides of the historic events depicted in the film. The film was received with bitter criticism, especially from Muslim and Hindu critics, who considered it an attempt to whitewash Mountbatten’s actions in the Partition of India and the terrible consequences of that decision. However, I contend that the victors in the film are Gurinder Chadha’s family and the survivors of Partition, and that she uses herstory to pay homage to those who suffered the consequences of the decision. Furthermore, Chadha includes narrative and formal devices to underscore that her narration and knowledge are situated, rather than claiming to provide a transparent and objective account of the events that took place in the Indian subcontinent in 1947. The focus of my critical approach, then, will be the analysis of these devices and how the filmmaker ultimately challenges ‘historical facts’ or any attempt at offering the definitive version of history in order to problematise Churchill’s statement and the official British account of Partition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDERSON, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. Verso.

BANERJEE, Bidisha. 2022. “‘Alphabets of Flesh’: Writing the Body and Diasporic Women’s Autobiography in Meena Alexander’s Fault Lines”. English Studies 103 (8): 1210-1227.

BETTETINI, Gianfranco. 1996. La conversación audiovisual. Trans. V. Ponce. Ediciones Cátedra.

BHABHA, Homi. 1994. The Location of Culture. Routledge.

BHUTTO, Fatima. 2017. “Fatima Bhutto on Indian Partition film Viceroy’s House: I Watched This Servile Pantomime and Wept”. The Guardian (March 3). <https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/mar/03/fatima-bhutto-viceroys-house-watched-servile-pantomime-and-wept>. Accessed October 10, 2023.

BRAH, Avtar and Annie E. COOMBES. 2000. Hybridity and its Discontents. Politics, Science, Culture. Routledge.

BRAUER, Chris J., Jonathan SANDOVAL-CASTILLO, Katie GATES, Michael P. HAMMER, Peter J. UNMACK, Louis BERNATCHEZ and Luciano B. BEHEREGARAY. 2023. “Natural Hybridization Reduces Vulnerability to Climate Change”. Natural Climate Change 13: 282-289. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01585-1>.

BUTLER, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life. The Power of Mourning and Violence. Verso.

CASETTI, Francesco and Federico DI CHIO. (1991) 1998. Cómo analizar un film. Trans. C. Losilla. Paidós.

CHADHA, Gurinder. 2016. “Gurinder Chadha on Viceroy’s House: Why I Had to Make a Film about Partition”. The Guardian (April 16). <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/16/gurinder-chadha-on-viceroys-house-why-i-had-to-make-a-film-about-Partition>. Accessed October 10, 2023.

CHADHA, Gurinder. 2017a. “Viceroy’s House: Production Notes”.

CHADHA, Gurinder. 2017b. Viceroy’s House. Cameo Media.

CHADHA, Gurinder. 2017c. “Gurinder Chadha: My Film Has Been Wilfully Misrepresented as Anti-Muslim”, in The Guardian (March 3). <https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2017/mar/03/gurinder-chadha-defends-viceroys-house-film-fatima-bhutto>. Accessed October 10, 2023.

CLINI, Clelia and Deimantas VALANČIŪNAS. 2021. “Diasporic Visions: Colonialism, Nostalgia and the Empire in Gurinder Chadha’s Viceroy’s House”. South Asian Diaspora 13 (1): 23-36 <https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2020.1767894>.

CLOUGH, Patricia Ticineto (ed). 2007. The Affective Turn. Theorizing the Social. Duke U.P.

The Combahee River Collective Statement. 2015. Library of Congress Web Archive. <https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0028151/>. Accessed April 1, 2026.

CRENSHAW, Kimberle. 1991. “Mappping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color”. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241-1299.

DAVIS, Angela Y. 1981. Women, Race & Class. Random House.

DESAI, Jigna. 2004. Beyond Bollywood. The Cultural Politics of South Asian Diasporic Film. Routledge.

ESPOSITO, Roberto. 2009. Communitas. The Origin and Destiny of Community. Trans. T. Campbell. Stanford U.P.

GILROY, Paul. 2004. After Empire. Routledge.

GROSBY, Steven. 2005. Nationalism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford U.P.

GREENBERG, Aaron. 2016. “Making Way for Tomorrow: Benjamin and Foucault on History and Freedom”. Journal of Political Thought 2: 22-39.

GROSFOGUEL, Ramón. 2011. “Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy: Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality”. TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts 1 (1). <https://doi.org/10.5070/T411000004>.

HALASZ, Judith R. 2011. “Gender Politics and the Critical Gaze: Jean-Luc Godard’s Masculin-Feminin”. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1 (13): 26-32.

HARAWAY, Donna J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.

HARAWAY, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke U.P.

HARDT, Michael and Antonio NEGRI. 2000. Empire. Harvard U.P.

HOOKS, bell. 2014. Ain’t I a Woman. Black Women and Feminism. Routledge. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743264>.

HUTCHEON, Linda. 1989. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge.

HUTNYK, John. 2018. “Screen Violence and Partition”. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 19 (4): 610-626. <https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2018.1543287>.

KAPCHAN, Deborah A. and Pauline Turner STRONG. 1999. “Theorizing the Hybrid”. The Journal of American Folklore 112 (445): 239-253. <https://doi.org/10.2307/541360>.

KAPLAN, E. Ann. 1997. Looking for the Other. Feminism, Film, and the Imperial Gaze. Routledge.

KEARNEY, Richard. 1997. Postnationalist Ireland. Politics, Culture, Philosophy. Routledge.

KHOSLA, Gopal Das. 1989. Stern Reckoning: A Survey of the Events Leading Up to and Following the Partition of India. Oxford U.P.

KUREISHI, Hanif. 1990. The Buddha of Suburbia. Faber & Faber.

LACLAU, Ernesto and Chantal MOUFFE (eds.). 2000. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. Verso.

LOBB, Andrea. 2022. “The Empathiser’s New Shoes. The Discomforts of Empathy as White Feminist Affect”. In Kolehmainen, Marjo, Annukka Lahti and Kinneret Lahad (eds.) Affective Intimacies. Manchester U.P.: 83-99. <https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526158574.00011>.

LORDE, Audre. 1984. Sister Outsider. Essays and Speeches. Crossing Press.

LYOTARD, Jean-François. 1979. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Manchester U.P.

MAALOUF, Amin. 1999. Identidades Asesinas. Trans. F. Villaverde. Alianza Editorial.

MARTÍN-LUCAS, Belén. 2024. “Empathy, Response-ability and Decolonial Love: Learning Ethics of Relationality from Indigenous Feminisms”. European Journal of English Studies (EJES) 28 (1): 83-100. <https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2024.2420947>.

MENDES, A.C. 2007. “Bride & Prejudice and the (Post-)national Cinema Debate”. In Ceia, Carlos and Isabel Lousada (orgs.) Novos Caminhos da História e da Cultura. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas: 95-103. <http://hdl.handle.net/10451/30222>. Accessed July 1, 2023.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary. <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hybrid>. Accessed July 1, 2024.

MOHANRAM, Radhika. 2011. “Gendered Spectre. Trauma, Cultural Memory and the Indian Partition”. Cultural Studies 25 (6): 917-934. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.575263>.

MORAGA, Cherríe and Gloria E. ANZALDÚA. 1981. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Persephone Press.

NAFICY, Hamid. 2001. An Accented Cinema. Exilic and Diasporic Filmmaking. Princeton U.P.

NANCY, Jean-Luc. 2010. “Conloquium”. Minnesota Review 2010 (75): 101-108. <https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-2010-75-101>.

NÍ DHÚILL, Caitríona. 2013. “Engendering the Future: Bloch’s Utopian Philosophy in Dialogue with Gender Theory”. In Thompson, Peter and Slavoj Zizek (eds.): 144-163.

OLIETE-ALDEA, Elena. 2012. “Gurinder Chadha’s Bride and Prejudice: A Transnational Journey Through Time and Space”. International Journal of English Studies 12 (1): 167-182. <https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.12.1.118181>.

OLIETE-ALDEA, Elena. 2021. “Gurinder’s Chadha’s Viceroy’s House (2017) and Other Evictions”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 83: 173-187. <https://doi.org/10.25145/j.recaesin.2021.83.13>.

RENAN, Ernest. 1990. “What is a Nation?”. In Bhabha, Homi (ed.) Nation and Narration. Routledge: 8-22.

SAID, Edward W. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. Vintage Books.

SILVERMAN, Kaja. 1988. The Acoustic Mirror. The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema. Theories of Representation and Difference. Indiana U.P.

SINGH, Gurharpal. 1987. “Understanding the ‘Punjab Problem’”. Asian Survey 27 (12): 1268-1277.

SMITH, Barbara. 1998. Writings on Race, Gender, and Freedom: The Truth that Never Hurts. Rutgers U.P.

THOMPSON, Peter. 2013a. “Introduction: The Privatization of Hope and the Crisis of Negation”. In Thompson, Peter and Slavoj Zizek (eds.): 1-20.

THOMPSON, Peter. 2013b. “Religion, Utopia, and the Metaphysics of Contingency”. In Thompson, Peter and Slavoj Zizek (eds.): 82-105.

THOMPSON, Peter and Slavoj ZIZEK. (eds.) 2013. The Privatization of Hope. Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia. Duke U.P.

WAUGH, Patricia. 1993. Metafiction. Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Writing. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-24

Issue

Section

ARTICLES: Literature, film and cultural studies

How to Cite

Iglesias-Díaz, E. G. (2026). Viceroy’s House: Discerning Who the Victors Are. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 73, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.202611623

Funding data