Más allá de la codificación y el control: Filtración, categorización y bloqueo en la definición del sujeto inglés
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199811016Resumen
Este artículo ofrece una definición no intuitiva del sujeto inglés al analizar las propiedades de codificación y control de Keenan y al sostener que la filtración, las propiedades de bloqueo (correferencialidad, omisión del relativo y del objeto interrogativo) y la categorización también deben tenerse en cuenta en la definición de esta función gramatical. La consideración de las propiedades de filtración y bloqueo permite un enfoque transteórico de este fenómeno sintáctico que puede modificar la jerarquía de Keenan de las propiedades del sujeto y la jerarquía de las funciones sintácticas de Keenan y Comrie.
Descargas
Referencias
AARTS, F. and J. AARTS. 1988. English Syntactic Structures. 1982. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
AKMAJIAN, A. and F. HENRY. 1975. An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Grammar. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
ANDREWS, A. 1985. “The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase.” In Shopen ed.; 62-154.
ARNOLD, D., et al., eds. 1990. Essays on Grammatical Theory and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
BLAKE, B. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
BLOOMFIELD, L. 1984. Language. 1933. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
BOLKESTEIN, A. M. 1979. “Subject-to-Object Raising in Latin?” Lingua 48: 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(79)90089-5
BRESNAN, J. 1982. “Control and Complementation.” In Bresnan (ed.): 282-390.
--. ed. 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge (MA): MIT.
CHOMSKY, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge (MA): MIT. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323
--. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalisation.” In Jacobs and Rosenbaum eds.: 184-221.
--. 1986. Lectures on Government and Binding. 1981. Dordrecht: Foris.
--. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
CORBETT, G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119
DIK, S. 1968. Coordination: Its Implications for the Theory of General Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
--. 1979. “Raising in a Functional Grammar.” Lingua 47: 119-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(79)90032-9
--. 1980. Studies in Functional Grammar. London and New York: Academic Press.
--. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar 1: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
DIXON, R. 1990. “Subject and Object in Universal Grammar.” In Arnold et al. eds.: 91-118.
--. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
DOWNING, A. and P. LOCKE. 1992. A University Course in English Grammar. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
FAARLUND, J. T. 1988. “A typology of subjects.” In Hammond et al. 193-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.15faa
FIRBAS, J. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597817
FOLEY, W. 1993. “The Conceptual Basis of Grammatical Relations.” In Foley, ed.: 131-174.
--. The Role of Theory in Language Description. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
FOLEY, W. and R. VAN VALIN. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
GIVÓN, T. 1984/1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17
--. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introductio. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
--. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
GOLDBERG, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
HAEGEMAN, L. 1995. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
HALLIDAY, M. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
HAMMOND, M., et al., eds. 1988. Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17
HANNAY, M. 1985. English Existentials in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111334318
HUDDLESTON, R. 1976. An Introduction to English Transformational Syntax. London: Longman.
--. 1989. Introduction to the Grammar of English. 1984. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
HUMBOLDT, W. von 1988 (1836) On Language. 1836. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
JACOBS, R.A. and P.S. ROSENBAUM. 1970. English Transformational Grammar. Cambridge (MA): Ginn & Waltham,
KEENAN, E. L. 1975. “Some Universals of Passive in Relational Grammar.” Papers from the XIth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
--. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of Subject.” In Li, ed.: 303-333.
LAMBRECHT, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
LANGACKER, R. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar II: Descriptive Application. Stanford (CA): Stanford UP.
--. 1976. Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
LI, Ch. and S. THOMPSON. 1976. “Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language.” In Li, ed.: 457-489.
MARANTZ, A. P. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
MITHUN, M. 1991. “Motivation in the Emergence of Grammatical Categories.” In Traugott and Heine, eds.: 159-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.09mit
MORAVCSIK, E. A. and J. R. WIRTH eds. 1980. Syntax and Semantics 13: Current Approaches to Syntax. New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373105
MORENO CABRERA, J. C. 1991. Curso universitario de lingüística general 1: Teoría de la gramática y sintaxis general. Madrid: Síntesis.
NUYTS, J., A. M. BOLKESTEIN and C. VET eds. 1990. Layers and Levels of Representation in Language Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.13
PALMER, F. 1994. Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166638
PERLMUTTER, D. 1980. “Relational Grammar.” In Moravcsik and Wirth, eds.: 195-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373105_010
--. 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
PERLMUTTER, D. and P. M. POSTAL. 1974. Linguistic Institute Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
--. 1983. “Some Proposed Laws of Basic Clause Structure.” In Perlmutter, ed.: 81-128.
QUIRK, R. et al. 1991. A Grammar of Contemporary English. 1972. London: Longman.
QUIRK, R., et al. 1994. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. 1985. London: Longman.
RADFORD, A. 1988. Transformational Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840425
--. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
SAPIR, E. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
SCHACHTER, P. 1976. “The Subject in Philippine Languages.” In Li, ed.: 491-518.
SCHLESINGER, I. 1995. Cognitive Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
SHIBATANI, M. 1991. “Grammaticization of Topic into Subject.” In Traugott and Heine, eds.: 93-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.07shi
SHOPEN, T., ed. 1985. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
SIEWIERSKA, A. 1991. Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
TAYLOR, J. 1989. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
TRAUGOTT, E. C., and B. HEINE, eds. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1
VALIN, R. van 1990. “Layered Syntax in Role and Reference Grammar.” In Nuyts, Bolkestein and Vet, eds.: 193-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.13.10van
WIERZBICKA, A. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.18
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 1998 Javier Martín Arista
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
