Youth’s tolerance of corruption: exploring the influence of sensitivity to monetary inequity and sociodemographic factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10548Palabras clave:
tolerancia a la corrupción, aversión a la inequidad, sensibilidad a las diferencias monetarias, variables sociodemográficas, tipo de educaciónResumen
Se explora la relación entre la tolerancia a la corrupción y la sensibilidad de los estudiantes colombianos a las diferencias en las distribuciones monetarias aleatorias y variables sociodemográficas. Se proporciona evidencia de una relación entre la aversión a la inequidad monetaria y una reducida tolerancia a actos corruptos entre los jóvenes. El diseño incluyó dos experimentos: una tarea de corrupción y una tarea de sensibilidad a las diferencias en las recompensas monetarias. Participaron 220 estudiantes, con edades entre quince y veintitrés años, tanto de universidades públicas como privadas. Los participantes con preferencias por distribuciones justas mostraron una menor tolerancia a la corrupción. En este estudio, se identifican los factores cognitivos y sociodemográficos que influyen en la tolerancia a la corrupción entre la juventud colombiana. Asimismo, se describe la metodología utilizada para investigar la tolerancia a la corrupción y se examina el papel mediador de la sensibilidad a las diferencias monetarias en dicha aceptación.
Descargas
Citas
ABBINK K, IRLENBUSCH B, RENNER E (2002). An experimental bribery game. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 18(2):428-454. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/18.2.428, accessed January 15, 2023.
ANDERSSON S (2017). Beyond unidimensional measurement of corruption. Public Integrity, 19(1):58-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1200408, accessed December 4, 2023.
ANDVIG J, FJELDSTAD O (2001). Corruption: a review of contemporary research (CMI Report). Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute. http://www.cmi.no/publications/file/?861=corruption-a-review-of-contemporary-research, accessed January 28, 2023.
AYALA-GARCÍA J, BONET-MORÓN J, PÉREZ-VALBUENA G, HEILBRON-FERNÁNDEZ, SURET-LEGUIZAMÓN J (2022). La corrupción en Colombia: un análisis integral. Documentos de trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 307:1-45. https://repositorio.banrep.gov.co/handle/20.500.12134/10302, accessed February 15, 2023.
BAHOO S, ALON I, PALTRINIERI A (2020). Corruption in international business: a review and research agenda. International Business Review 29(4):101660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101660, accessed November 2, 2022.
BANFIELD EC (1958). The Moral Basis of a Backward. Society. Research Center, Chicago (Illinois).
BAYMUL C (2019). Perceived Income Inequality and Corruption. Global Relations Forum. http://www.gif.org.tr/Documents/cinar-baymul.pdf, accessed June 17, 2023
BOUN-MY K, LAMPACH N, LEFEBVRE M, MAGNANI J (2018). Effects of gain-loss frames on advantageous inequality aversion. Journal of the Economic Science Association 4(2):99-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-018-0057-2, accessed May 4, 2023.
BROSNAN SF (2016). Comportamientos relacionados con la justicia y la equidad en primates no humanos. Ludus Vitalis 21(40):249-272. https://www.centrolombardo.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/40-13_brosnan.pdf, accessed June 17, 2023.
CAMERON L, CHADHURI A, ERKAL N, GANGADHARAN L (2008). Propensities to Engage in and Punish Corrupt Behavior: Experimental Evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore. Journal of Public Economics 93(7-8):843-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.03.004, accessed December 4, 2023.
CAMPOS N, GIOVANNONI F (2007). Lobbying, corruption and political influence. Public Choice, 131:1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9102-4, accessed December 4, 2023.
CARRASCO D, BANERJEE R, TREVIÑO E, VILLALOBOS C (2020). Civic knowledge and open classroom discussion: explaining tolerance of corruption among 8th-grade students in Latin America. Educational Psychology 40(2):186-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1699907, accessed August 14, 2023.
CHAUDHURI A, PAICHAYONTVIJIT T, SBAI E (2016). The role of framing, inequity and history in a corruption game: some experimental evidence. Games 7(2):1-24. https:/doi.org/10.3390/g7020013, accessed April 8, 2023.
COHAILA E (2020). Interpersonal trust and corruption in Peru: Structural equation modeling. Perf. latinoam 28(56):151-175. https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2856-007-2020, accessed April 8, 2023.
CEPAL (COMISIÓN ECONÓMICA PARA AMÉRICA LATINA Y EL CARIBE) (2022). Panorama Social de América Latina y el Caribe (LC/PUB.2022/15-P), Santiago (Chile). https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/48518/S2200947_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, accessed March 20, 2023.
CONTRALORÍA GENERAL DE LA REPÚBLICA (2018). Grandes Hallazgos 2014-2018. Imprenta Nacional. Bogotá (Colombia).
DIMANT E, TOSATO G (2018). Causes and effects of corruption: what has the past decade’s empirical research taught us? A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 32:335–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12198, accessed January 27, 2023.
DINCER O, JOHNSTON M (2019). The search for the most CORRUPT State in the US. In L. Eileen (Ed.). Political corruption. Greenhaven Publishing, New York (US), pp. 39-48.
DOLLAR D, FISMAN R, GATTI R (2001). Are women really the «fairer» sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 46(4):423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00169-x, accessed December 4, 2023.
DUERRENBERGER N, WARNING S (2018). Corruption and education in developing countries: the role of public vs. private funding of higher education. International Journal of Educational Development 62:217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.05.002, accessed December 4, 2023.
DUPUY K, NESET S (2018). The cognitive psychology of corruption: micro-level explanations for unethical behavior. Chr. Michelsen Institute. https://www.u4.no/publications/the-cognitive-psychology-of-corruption.pdf, accessed October 11, 2023.
EVERETT J, FABER, N, CROCKETT M (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9(15):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015, accessed October 15, 2023.
FAJARDO E, MONTAGUT L, ROMERO H (2021). Incidencia de los factores socioeconómicos en la calidad de la educación media regional en Colombia. Interciencia 46(3):118-125. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33966543005, accessed October 15, 2023.
FARRALES M (2005). What is Corruption?: A History of Corruption Studies and the Great Definitions Debate. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1739962, accessed December 4, 2022.
FEHR E, SCHMIDT KM (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3):817-868. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/114/3/817/1848113, accessed June 17, 2023.
GADDI D (2023). Corrupción, pérdida de confianza social y justicia restaurativa. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos 43:1-30. https://doi.org/10.15304/epc.43.9181, accessed December 4, 2024.
GINO F, GALINSKY A (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: when psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 119(1):15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011, accessed July 15, 2023.
GOLDBERG F (2018). Corruption and lobbying: conceptual differentiation and gray areas. Crime, Law and Social Change 70:197-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9727-x, accessed December 4, 2023.
GONZALEZ G, BLAKE P, DUNHAM Y, MCAULIFFE K (2020). Ingroup bias does not influence inequity aversion in children. Developmental Psychology 56(6):1080-1091. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000924, accessed July 23, 2023.
GONZÁLEZ-RAMÍREZ M, MONSIVÁIS-CARRILLO A (2022). ¿Por qué la ciudadanía acepta pagar sobornos? La tolerancia a la corrupción en América Latina. América Latina Hoy, 91, 135-154. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.28059, accessed December 4, 2023.
GRAY K, WARD A, NORTON M (2014). Paying it forward: generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(1):247-254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031047, accessed July 23, 2023.
HEIDENHEIMER A, JOHNSTON M (2002). Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick.
HIDI S (2016). Revisiting the role of rewards in motivation and learning: implications of neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review 28:61-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9307-5, accessed July 23, 2023.
HIGHTON B (2009). Revisiting the relationship between educational attainment and political sophistication. The Journal of Politics 71(4):1564-1576. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990077, accessed December 4, 2023.
HUTCHERSON C, BUSHONG B, RANGEL A (2015). A neurocomputational model of altruistic choice and its implications. Neuron 87(2):451-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.031, accessed July 23, 2023.
IBARRA-BARAJAS M, MORENO-SIERRA M, ROMERO-MORA S, RUBIANO-QUINTERO J (2021). Aversión a la inequidad y corrupción: estudio desde una perspectiva del desarrollo [tesis de pregrado]. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/handle/10554/58706, accessed July 11, 2023.
JAAKSON K, JOHANNSEN L, PEDERSEN K, VADI M, ASHYROV G, REINO A, SÖÖT, M (2019). The role of costs, benefits, and moral judgments in private-to-private corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change 71(1):83-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9790-y, accessed July 21, 2022.
JAIN A (2001). Corruption: a review. Journal of Economic Surveys 15(1):71-121. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1467-6419.00133, accessed December 4, 2023.
JHA C, SARANGI S (2018). Women and corruption: what positions must they hold to make a difference? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 151:219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.021, accessed December 4, 2023.
JULIÁN M, BONAVIA T (2020). Variables psicológicas asociadas a la corrupción: una revisión sistemática. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology 36(2):330-339. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.389371, accessed January 5, 2023.
KÖBIS N, VAN PROOIJEN J, RIGHETTI F, VAN LANGE P (2015). Who doesn’t? The impact of descriptive norms on corruption. PLOS ONE 16(6):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131830, accessed January 5, 2023.
KÖBIS N, VAN PROOIJEN J, RIGHETTI F, VAN LANGE P (2017). The road to bribery and corruption: slippery slope or steep cliff. Psychological Science 28(3):297-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616682026, accessed December 4, 2023.
LANGBEIN L, SANABRIA P (2013). The shape of corruption: Colombia as a case study. Journal of Development Studies 49(11):1500-1513. https:/doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.800858, accessed November 4, 2023.
LAUGLO J (2013). Do more knowledgeable adolescents have more rationally based civic attitudes? Analysis of 38 countries. Educational Psychology 33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.772773, accessed July 23, 2023.
LEFF N (1964). Economic Development Through Bureaucratic Corruption. American Behavioral Scientist 8(3):8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303, accessed November 4, 2023.
LI O, XU F, WANG L (2018). Advantageous inequity aversion does not always exist: the role of determining allocations modulates preferences for advantageous inequity. Frontiers in Psychology 9:749. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00749, accessed July 23, 2023.
LIU T, JUANG W, YU C (2022). Understanding corruption with perceived corruption: the understudied effect of corruption tolerance. Public Integrity:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2029095, accessed January 5, 2023.
LÓPEZ-LÓPEZ W, ROA M, ROA D, PINEDA C, MULLET E (2016). Mapping Colombian citizens’ views regarding ordinary corruption: threat, ribery, and the illicit sharing of confidential information. Social Indicators Research 133:259-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1366-6, accessed November 4, 2023.
MAKOWSKI D, BEN-SHACHAR M, CHEN S, LÜDECKE D (2019). Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Frontiers in Psychology 10:2767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767, accessed July 23, 2023.
MANGAFIĆ J, VESELINOVIĆ L (2020). The determinants of corruption at the individual level: evidence from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 33(1):2670-2691. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1723426, accessed November 4, 2023.
MARTIN J (2018). Calidad educativa en la educación superior colombiana: una aproximación teórica. Sophia 14(2):4-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.18634/sophiaj.14v.2i.799, accessed January 5, 2023.
MARTÍNEZ C, POSADA R (2022). The influence of sociocultural beliefs on adolescents’ moral and tolerance evaluations toward corruption. Journal of Research on Adolescence 32(4):1515-1529. https:/doi.org/10.1111/jora.12729, accessed November 4, 2023.
MCAULIFFE K, DUNHAM Y (2017). Fairness overrides group bias in children’s second-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 146:485-494. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000244, accessed October 15, 2023.
MCAULIFFE K, BENJAMIN N, WARNEKEN F (2022). Reward type influences adults’ rejections of inequality in a task designed for children. PLOS ONE 17(8):e0272710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272710, accessed November 4, 2023.
MEJÍA S (2016). ¿Vamos hacia una Colombia bilingüe? Análisis de la brecha académica entre el sector público y privado en la educación del inglés. Educ. Educ. 19(2):223-237. https:/doi.org/10.5294/edu.2016.19.2.3, accessed December 11, 2022.
MICHELE R, PRATS J, LOSADA I (2018). Efectos de la corrupción en los contratos de asociaciones público-privadas. Consecuencias de un enfoque de tolerancia cero. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001355, accessed December 11, 2022.
MIOČEVIĆ M, GONZALEZ O, VALENTE M, MACKINNON D (2018). A tutorial in Bayesian potential outcomes mediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling 25(1):121-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1342541, accessed December 4, 2023.
MOCAN N (2008). What determines corruption? International evidence from microdata. Economic Inquiry 46(4):493-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00107.x, accessed November 4, 2023.
MONTERO M (2007). Inequity Aversion May Increase Inequity. The Economic Journal 117(519):C192-C204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4625505, accessed July 23, 2023.
MONTERO V (2017). Aspectos psicosociales de la corrupción, la violencia y el ejercicio del poder en el Perú. Revista de Investigación en Psicología 20(1):209-230. https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v20i1.13532, accessed July 23, 2023.
NEILD R (2002). Public Corruption: The Dark Side of Social Evolution. Anthem, London.
NEIRA A (2018). En 2017 aumentó el abismo entre millonarios y pobres. El Tiempo, 27 de enero. https://www.eltiempo.com/economia/sectores/desigualdad-aumento-en-el-2017-y-la-brecha-entre-ricos-y-pobres-175900, accessed December 11, 2022.
NEWMAN V, ÁNGEL M (2017). Sobre la corrupción en Colombia: marco conceptual, diagnóstico y propuestas de política. Cuadernos Fedesarrollo 56. http://www.repository.fedesarrollo.org.co/handle/11445/3436, accessed July 21, 2022.
NYE J (1967). Corruption and political development: a cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review 61(2):417-427. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1953254.pdf, accessed November 4, 2023.
OBERLIESSEN L, KALENSCHER T (2019). Social and non-social mechanisms of inequity aversion in non-human animals. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 13:133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00133, accessed December 4, 2023.
OLKEN B, PANDE R (2012). Corruption in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics 4(1):479-509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110917, accessed November 4, 2023.
OSIFO C (2018). A Network Perspective and Hidden Corruption. Journal of Public Administration and Governance 8(1):115-136. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i1.12697, accessed November 4, 2023.
PEARL J, MACKEZIE D (2018). The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. Basic Books, New York.
PEREIRA M, FERNANDEZ‐VAZQUEZ P (2022). Does electing women reduce corruption? A regression discontinuity approach. Legislative Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12409, accessed July 23, 2023.
PERSSON M (2015). Education and political participation. British Journal of Political Science 45(3):689-703. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000409, accessed June 13, 2023.
POZSGAI-ALVAREZ J (2015). Low-level corruption tolerance: an «action-based» approach for Peru and Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America 7(2):99-129. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1866802X1500700204, accessed July 23, 2023.
POZSGAI-ALVAREZ J (2022). Corruption tolerance as a process of moral, social, and political cognition: Evidence from Latin America. Crime Law Soc Change 77:381-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09995-6, accessed July 23, 2023.
QIU X, YU J, LI T, CHENG N, ZHU L (2017). Children’s inequity aversion in procedural justice context: a comparison of advantageous and disadvantageous inequity. Frontiers in Psychology 8:1855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01855, accessed October 15, 2023.
REYES-JAQUEZ B, KOENIG M (2021). The development of a morality against power abuse: the case of bribery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 150(11):2362–2374. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000926, accessed December 4, 2023.
REYES‐JAQUEZ B, KOENIG M (2022). Greasing (small) palms: early rejection of bribery. Child Development 93(5):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13814, accessed December 11, 2022.
RINCÓN-UNIGARRO C, LÓPEZ-LÓPEZ W, GUTIÉRREZ-ROMERO M, CASTAÑEDA J, UNDA-SEGURA A, ORJUELA-GARCÍA A. (2022). The (non-)reconciliatory effect of reparations for victims of political violence: a cross-sectional study of the Colombian transitional context. International Journal of Social Psychology 37(1):144-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2021.2002059, accessed July 23, 2023.
ROBBINS P (2000). The rotten institution: Corruption in natural resource management. Political Geography 19(4):423-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00087-6, accessed July 23, 2023.
SALGADO C (2004). El flagelo de la corrupción: conceptualizaciones teóricas y alternativas de solución. Liberabit. Revista Peruana de Psicología 10:27-40. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=68601005, accessed March 20, 2023.
SÁNCHEZ-TORRES R (2017). Desigualdad del ingreso en Colombia: un estudio por departamentos. Cuadernos de Economía 36(72):139-178. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v36n72.65880, accessed June 13, 2023.
SANFEY A (2007). Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science 318(5850):598-602. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1142996, accessed March 20, 2023.
SCHREUDERS E, BRAAMS B, BLANKENSTEIN N, PEPER J, GÜROĞLU B, CRONE E (2018). Contributions of reward sensitivity to ventral striatum activity across adolescence and early adulthood. Child Development 89(3):797-810. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13056, accessed October 15, 2023.
SCHULZ W, AINLEY J, FRAILLON J, LOSITO B, AGRUSTI G, FRIEDMAN T (2018). Becoming citizens in changing world: IEA international civic and citizenship education study 2016 international report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-73963-2.pdf, accessed March 20, 2023
SKINNER G (1965). East-West Parallels: Sociological Approaches to Modern Asia. The Journal of Asian Studies 25(1):125-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2051047, accessed March 20, 2023.
STAGNARO M, DUNHAM Y, RAND D (2018). Profit versus prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science 9(1):50-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699254, accessed April 8, 2023.
STRANG S, GROTE X, KUSS K, PARK S, WEBER B (2016). Generalized Negative Reciprocity in the Dictator Game – How to Interrupt the Chain of Unfairness. Sci Rep 6, 22316. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22316, accessed July 23, 2023
TORGLER B, VALEV N (2006). Corruption and age. Journal of Bioeconomics 8:133-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-006-9003-0, accessed June 13, 2023.
TORNEY-PURTA J, BARBER C, RICHARDSON W (2004). Trust in government-related institutions and political engagement among adolescents in six countries. Acta Politica 39(4):380-406. https:/doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500080, accessed December 11, 2022.
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020, accessed June 13, 2023.
VALE G., BROSNAN S (2017). Inequity Aversion. In J. Vonk & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1084-1, accessed April 8, 2023.
VAN DUIJVENVOORDE A, DE MACKS, Z, OVERGAAUW S, MOOR B, DAHL R, CRONE E (2014). A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of reward-related brain activation: effects of age, pubertal stage, and reward sensitivity. Brain and Cognition 89:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.005, accessed March 20, 2023.
VAN LEIJENHORST L, ZANOLIE K, VAN MEEL C, WESTENBERG P, ROMBOUTS S, CRONE E (2010). What Motivates the adolescent? Brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence, Cerebral Cortex 20(1):61-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp078, accessed October 15, 2023.
VELEZ G, KNOWLES R (2020). Trust, civic self-efficacy, and acceptance of corruption among Colombian adolescents: shifting attitudes between 2009-2016. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1854084, accessed April 8, 2023.
WAISMEL-MANOR I, MOY P, NEUMANN R, SHECHNICK M (2022). Does Corruption Corrupt? The behavioral effects of mediated exposure to corruption. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 34(1):edab031. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edab031, accessed March 20, 2023.
WANG D, LIU T, SHI J (2017). Development of monetary and social reward processes. Scientific Reports 7(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11558-6, accessed July 2, 2022.
WANG J, FU X, ZHANG L, KOU Y (2015). The impacts of moral evaluations and descriptive norms on children’s and adolescents’ tolerance of transgression. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 9(2):86-96. https:/doi.org/10.1017/prp.2015.11, accessed July 2, 2022.
WILLIAMS A, MOORE C (2014). Exploring disadvantageous inequality aversion in children: how cost and discrepancy influence decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology 5:1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01088, accessed April 8, 2023.
ZAKARIA P (2018). Religiosity and Corruption. In: Kubbe I, Engelbert A (eds.). Corruption and Norms. Political Corruption and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66254-1_5, accessed March 20, 2023.
ZHENG, J.D, SCHRAM, A., DOĞAN, G. (2020). Friend or Foe? Social ties in bribery and corruption. Experimental Economics 24:854-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09683-7, accessed October 15, 2022.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Mario Fernando Gutiérrez-Romero, Juan José Giraldo-Huertas, Santiago Alonso-Díaz, María Ibarra-Barajas, Mariana Moreno-Sierra, Sofía Romero-Mora, María Juliana Rubiano-Quintero
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
