The academic or hybrid trend of buen vivir: buen vivir as a chameleonic or catch-all concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.12196Keywords:
alternative development, alternatives to development, empty buen vivir, lived utopias, suma qamaña, sumaq kawsayAbstract
Currently, there are three recognized trends of buen vivir (BV): culturalist-indigenous, ecologist-post-developmentalist, and socialist-statist. In recent years, there has been talk of a hybrid trend born out of academic studies.
This article first presents all the characteristics defined to date regarding this hybrid BV. It then analyzes all articles on BV in the categories of «economics» and «development» in three databases, to determine the principles that define this trend.
It has been concluded that it is not correct to speak of a new trend: on the one hand, there is no total consensus on whether BV is an alternative to development or an alternative development; on the other hand, BV is often linked to terms such as «well-being», «community», «sustainability», «food sovereignty», and/or «social and solidarity economy», as well as «indigenous ways of life». However, depending on the work consulted, different and even contradictory interpretations appear.
Downloads
References
ALAMINOS CHICA A, PENALVA VERDÚ C (2017). Entre el Sumaq Kawsay y el Buen Vivir Institucional. Los discursos sociales del Buen Vivir en las zonas rurales del Sur de Ecuador. Revista de Paz y Conflictos 10(1):137-167. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6103276, accessed June 3, 2025.
ALTMANN P (2017). Sumaq Kawsay as an Element of Local Decolonization in Ecuador. Latin American Research Review 52(5):749-759. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.242
ALTMANN P (2019). Los pueblos indígenas en el buen vivir global, un concepto como herramienta de inclusión de los excluidos. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 8(1):58-80. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.334
ARCE ÁLVAREZ P, CARRASCO TABOADA F, COLLQUE ARRIETA J, FLORES RIVERO L, GUERRA CARRASCO M, LOAYZA BAREA V, SORIA MURILLO Ó (2018). Institucionalización de la educación intracultural, intercultural y plurilingüe en Bolivia: evolución del marco legal 1992-2017. Ministerio de Educación del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. https://seie.minedu.gob.bo/pdfs/EDUCACI%C3%93N%20IIEP%20alta.pdf, accessed October 8, 2025.
ARCE ROJAS RS (2024). Contribuciones de los principios agroecológicos a la sustentabilidad de las plantaciones forestales con fines comerciales. Reflexiones a partir del caso peruano. Siembra 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v11i2.6747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v11i2.6747
ASAMBLEA NACIONAL CONSTITUYENTE (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente, Montecristi.
BELING AE, VANHULST J, DEMARIA F, RABI V, CARBALLO AE, PELENC J (2018). Discursive Synergies for a «Great Transformation» Towards Sustainability: Pragmatic Contributions to a Necessary Dialogue Between Human Development, Degrowth, and Buen Vivir. Ecological Economics 144:304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025
BELL K, HICKEL J, ARBON R, ZOOMKAWALA H (2023). Which direction for sustainable development? A time series comparison of the impacts of redistributive versus market policies in Bolivia and South Korea. Sustainable Development 31(5):3408-3427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2592
BETANCURTH-LOAIZA DP, SÁNCHEZ-PALACIO N, VÉLEZ-ÁLVAREZ C (2024). Aproximación al Buen Vivir: Una experiencia de emprendimiento por mujeres de la zona rural. RIVAR (Santiago) 11(32):236-253. https://doi.org/10.35588/rivar.v11i32.6088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35588/rivar.v11i32.6088
BRACARENSE N, GIL-VASQUEZ K (2018). Bolivia’s Institutional Transformation: Contact Zones, Social Movements, and the Emergence of an Ethnic Class Consciousness. Journal of Economic Issues 52(3):615-636. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1495986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1495986
BRAUN V, CLARKE V (2014). What can «thematic analysis» offer health and wellbeing researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 9(1):26152-26152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152
BROAD R, FISCHER-MACKEY J (2017). From extractivism towards buen vivir: mining policy as an indicator of a new development paradigm prioritising the environment. Third World Quarterly 38(6):1327-1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1262741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1262741
BURCHARDT H-J, ICKLER J (2021). Time to live well: well-being and time affluence for sustainable development. Third World Quarterly 42(12):2939-2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1981761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1981761
CAPPELLI F, CARAVAGGIO N, VAQUERO-PIÑEIRO C (2022). Buen Vivir and forest conservation in Bolivia: false promises or effective change? Forest Policy and Economics 137:102695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102695
CARIA S, DOMÍNGUEZ R (2016). Ecuador’s Buen Vivir: A New Ideology for Development. Latin American Perspectives 43(1):18-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15611126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15611126
CARRANZA-BARONA C, VILLALBA-EGUILUZ U, HURTADO G, VILLAVICENCIO-SALAZAR N (2025). Experiencias de transición ecosocial en Ecuador desde la economía social solidaria y la agroecología. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 14(1):54-79. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10636
CHASSAGNE N (2019). Sustaining the «Good Life»: Buen Vivir as an alternative to sustainable development. Community Development Journal 54(3):482-500. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsx062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsx062
CHASSAGNE N (2022). Rethinking sustainability: recalibrating the global SDGs to align with local principles for Buen Vivir. Community Development Journal bsac021. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsac021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsac021
CHOQUEHUANCA D (2010). Hacia la reconstrucción del Vivir Bien. América Latina en Movimiento 452:8-13.
CLARK P (2017). Neo‐developmentalism and a «vía campesina» for rural development: unreconciled projects in Ecuador’s Citizen’s Revolution. Journal of Agrarian Change 17(2):348-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12203
CONAIE (2007). Propuesta de la CONAIE frente a la Asamblea Constituyente. Principios y lineamientos para la nueva Constitución del Ecuador. Por un Estado Plurinacional, Unitario, Soberano, Incluyente, Equitativo y Laico. CONAIE, Quito.
CONAIE (2012). Proyecto político para la construcción del Estado plurinacional. Propuesta desde la visión de la CONAIE, Quito. https://conaie.org/2015/07/21/proyecto-politico-conaie-2012/, accessed September 17, 2018.
COQ HUELVA D (2024). Aportaciones latinoamericanas al pensamiento económico: dependencia, extractivismo y buen vivir. Araucaria 26(57):379-432. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2024.i57.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2024.i57.18
CORAL GUERRERO CA (2018). Emprendimiento indígena, ¿una dimensión económica del «Sumaq Kawsay»? REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos 129:123-141. https://doi.org/10.5209/REVE.62849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/REVE.62849
COSTOYA MM (2012). Latin American Post-Neoliberal Development Thinking: The Bolivian «Turn» Toward Suma Qamaña. The European Journal of Development Research 25(2):213-229. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2012.41
CUBILLO-GUEVARA AP, HIDALGO-CAPITÁN AL (2015). El trans-desarrollo como manifestación de la trans-modernidad. Más allá de la subsistencia, el desarrollo y el post-desarrollo. Revista de Economía Mundial (41). https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i41.3938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i41.3938
CUBILLO-GUEVARA AP, HIDALGO-CAPITÁN AL (2019). (Emergencia), deconstrucción (y síntesis) del buen vivir latinoamericano. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Solidaria e Innovación Socioecológica (2):189-210. http://hdl.handle.net/10272/17196, accessed February 26, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/riesise.v2i1.3615
CUESTAS-CAZA J (2022). Sumaq Kawsay is not Buen Vivir. Alternautas 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31273/alternautas.v5i1.1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31273/alternautas.v5i1.1070
CUESTAS CAZA JA (2020). El Sumaq Kawsay: entre el (post)desarrollismo occidental y la filosofía andina. Doctoral thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/162882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/162882
DANIEL A, NEUBERT D (2024). Development as Utopia? Road to a Better Future Between Fiction and Lived Utopian Practice. Forum for Development Studies 51(2):189-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2024.2314279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2024.2314279
DOMÍNGUEZ R, CARIA S (2018). Raíces latinoamericanas del otro desarrollo: estilos de desarrollo y desarrollo a escala humana. América Latina en la Historia Económica 25(2):175-209. http://hdl.handle.net/10902/14827, accessed October 8, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18232/alhe.898
FASH BC, VÁSQUEZ RIVERA BDC, SOJOB M (2023). Prefiguring buen sobrevivir: Lenca women’s (e)utopianism amid climate change. The Journal of Peasant Studies 50(6):2232-2258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2138353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2138353
FLORES CHAMBA E (2020). El modelo extractivista y los peligros para la soberanía alimentaria en el caso ecuatoriano. SaberEs 12(1):1-19. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7611864, accessed December 13, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35305/s.v12i1.209
FRANCO DL, BALAUDO CG (2019). El potencial desmercantilizador del derecho en las propuestas del buen vivir. SaberEs 11(1):21-39. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6998894, accessed December 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35305/s.v11i1.172
GARCÍA-ARIAS J, TORNEL C, FLORES GUTIÉRREZ M (2025). Weaving a rhizomatic pluriverse: allin kawsay, the Crianza Mutua Networks, and the Global Tapestry of Alternatives. Globalizations 22(2):302-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2352942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003727569-11
GARCÍA-GARCÍA A (2022a). Sumaq kawsay indianista, una alternativa al capitalismo global. RECERCA. Revista de Pensament i Anàlisi. https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.5979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.5979
GARCÍA-GARCÍA A (2022b). The limits to growth of buen vivir socialism: Ecuador’s alternative development model from 2007 to 2017. History of Economic Thought and Policy (1):25-59. https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2022-001003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2022-001003
GARCÍA-GARCÍA A (2023). Las visiones indianista y ecologista del sumaq kawsay/buen vivir y la lectura revisionista de los socialismos. Doctoral thesis, Universidad de Granada. https://hdl.handle.net/10481/96694, accessed October 3, 2024.
GARCÍA-GARCÍA A (2025). Ecologist or post-developmentalist buen vivir: a biocentric alternative from activism. Collectivus, Revista de Ciencias Sociales 12(1). https://doi.org/10.15648/Collectivus.vol12num1.2025.4595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15648/Collectivus.vol12num1.2025.4595
GIOVANNINI M (2014). Indigenous community enterprises in Chiapas: a vehicle for buen vivir? Community Development Journal 50(1):71-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu019
GIOVANNINI M (2015). Alternatives to Development: The Contribution of Indigenous Community Enterprises in Chiapas. Journal of International Development 28(7):1138-1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3141
GUARDIOLA J, GARCÍA-QUERO F (2014). Buen Vivir (living well) in Ecuador: Community and environmental satisfaction without household material prosperity? Ecological Economics 107:177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.032
HABERSANG A (2025). Tackling terricide, not (only) ecocide: further exploring the nexus between social-ecological destruction. Globalizations 22(2):323-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2400002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2400002
HAMMOND JL (2011). Indigenous Community Justice in the Bolivian Constitution of 2009. Human Rights Quarterly 33(3):649-681. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23015997, accessed January 3, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2011.0030
HARCOURT W (2013). The future of capitalism: a consideration of alternatives. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38(6):1307-1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet048
HERNANDEZ C, VALENZUELA GOMEZ A (2024). Well‐being in the context of Indigenous heritage management: A Hach Winik perspective from Metzabok, Chiapas, Mexico. Economic Anthropology 11(2):187-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12319
HIDALGO‐CAPITÁN AL, GUILLÉN GARCÍA A, DELEG GUAZHA N (2014). Sumaq Kawsay Yuyay: Antología del Pensamiento Indigenista Ecuatoriano sobre Sumaq Kawsay. CIM/PYDLOS/FIUCUHU, Huelva/Cuenca.
HIDALGO-CAPITÁN AL, GARCÍA-ÁLVAREZ S, CUBILLO-GUEVARA AP, MEDINA-CARRANCO N (2019). Los Objetivos del Buen Vivir. Una propuesta alternativa a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 8(1):6-57. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.354
HORN P, GRUGEL J (2018). The SDGs in middle-income countries: setting or serving domestic development agendas? Evidence from Ecuador. World Development 109:73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.005
INUCA LECHÓN JB (2017). Genealogía de alli kawsay/sumaq kawsay (vida buena/vida hermosa) de las organizaciones kichwas del Ecuador desde mediados del siglo XX. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2017.1325101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2017.1325101
JARAMILLO CARVAJAL Ó, JÁCOME CALVACHE V (2019). De economía popular a economía popular y solidaria en Quito: el caso de los indígenas urbanos inmigrantes del barrio San Roque. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.96.12148
JIMENEZ A, DELGADO D, MERINO R, ARGUMEDO A (2022). A Decolonial Approach to Innovation? Building Paths Towards Buen Vivir. The Journal of Development Studies 58(9):1633-1650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2043281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2043281
KAUFFMAN CM, MARTIN PL (2014). Scaling up Buen Vivir: Globalizing Local Environmental Governance from Ecuador. Global Environmental Politics 14(1):40-58. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00639
KOMMANDEUR Q, ALENDA-DEMOUTIEZ J, KAUFMANN M, VISSEREN-HAMAKERS I (2025). Varieties of Anticapitalism: a systematic study of transformation strategies in alternative economic discourses. Ecological Economics 227:108423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108423
KOWII A (2011). El Sumaq Kawsay. Aportes Andinos, 28.
LATOUCHE S (2020). Degrowth and the Paradoxes of Happiness. Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science 54(1). https://doi.org/10.26331/1103.
LÉON R (2015). «Tell Me What You Eat and I’ll Tell You Who You Are»: Changing Eating Habits in Cochabamba, Bolivia. IDS Bulletin 46(6):110-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-5436.12194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-5436.12194
LÓPEZ CASTELLANO F (2007). Desarrollo: crónica de un desafío permanente. Universidad de Granada, Granada.
LUGO-MORIN DR (2018). Bioeconomía: una revisión desde la experiencia de Ecuador y Bolivia. Revista de coyuntura y perspectiva 3(3):73-92. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=10150721, accessed December 16, 2026.
LYALL A, COLLOREDO-MANSFELD R, ROUSSEAU M (2018). Development, Citizenship, and Everyday Appropriations of Buen Vivir: Ecuadorian Engagement with the Changing Rhetoric of Improvement. Bulletin of Latin American Research 37(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12742
MCAFEE K (2016). Green economy and carbon markets for conservation and development: a critical view. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16(3):333-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9295-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-015-9295-4
MEADOWS DH, MEADOWS DL, RANDERS J, BEHRENS WW (1972). The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York.
MERINO R (2016). An alternative to «alternative development»?: buen vivir and human development in Andean countries. Oxford Development Studies 44(3):271-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1144733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1144733
MINISTERIO DE PLANIFICACIÓN DEL DESARROLLO (2007). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo. «Bolivia digna, soberana, productiva y democrática para vivir bien». Lineamientos estratégicos 2006-2011. Ministerio de Planificación del Desarrollo, La Paz.
MORALES A, CALVO S (2023). Is the Buen Vivir of indigenous social enterprises in Colombia informing SDGs? Social Enterprise Journal 19(4):347-369. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2022-0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2022-0049
PAGE MJ, MCKENZIE JE, BOSSUYT PM, BOUTRON I, HOFFMANN TC, MULROW CD, SHAMSEER L, TETZLAFF JM, AKL EA, BRENNAN SE, CHOU R, GLANVILLE J, GRIMSHAW J M, HRÓBJARTSSON A, LALU MM, LI T, LODER EW, MAYO-WILSON E, MCDONALD S, MOHER D (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
PÉREZ-GAÑÁN R (2019). Mecanismos de exclusión de los pueblos originarios en los discursos y representaciones del Buen Vivir ecuatoriano y el Vivir Bien boliviano: el tutelaje y la desapropiación simbólica. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 6(2):48-70. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.246
PIÑEIRO AGUIAR E (2016). Radicalidad y crítica del Buen Vivir: una lectura desde Bolívar Echeverría. Economía y Desarrollo 157(2):120-129. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9963066, accessed December 16, 2026.
POSNER PW (2022). Buen Vivir under Correa: The Rhetoric of Participatory Democracy, the Reality of Rentier Populism. Latin American Research Review 57(4):794-812. https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2022.57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2022.57
RANTA EM (2016). Toward a Decolonial Alternative to Development? The Emergence and Shortcomings of Vivir Bien as State Policy in Bolivia in the Era of Globalization. Globalizations 13(4):425-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1141596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1141596
RANTA E (2018). State Governance and Micropractices of Power in the Process of Decolonizing the State in Bolivia. Forum for Development Studies 45(3):363-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2018.1452790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2018.1452790
RICHTER K (2025). Cosmological limits to growth, affective abundance, and Rights of Nature: insights from Buen Vivir/sumaq kawsay for the cultural politics of degrowth. Ecological Economics 228:108442-108442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108442
RUIZ-CHIRIBOGA OR (2012). Indigenous Corporal Punishments in Ecuador and the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatments. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1996919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1996919
SÁNCHEZ J (2025). Progresismo en Ecuador: Políticas socioeconómicas para el buen vivir (2007-2017). Cuadernos de Economía 44(93):197-235. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v44n93.118279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v44n93.118279
SCARLATO M (2013). Social Enterprise, Capabilities and Development Paradigms: Lessons from Ecuador. Journal of Development Studies 49(9):1270-1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.790962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.790962
SHEBELL E, MOSER S (2019). Planning for the Buen Vivir: socialism, decentralisation and urbanisation in rural Ecuador. International Development Planning Review 41(4):473-494. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2019.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2019.16
SUÁREZ-LÓPEZ R, EUGENIO M, LARA F, MOLINA-MOTOS D (2019). Examinando el papel de la educación ambiental en la construcción del buen vivir global: contribuciones de la corriente crítica a la definición de objetivos. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 8(1):82-105. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.336
TERRITORIO AUTÓNOMO DE LA NACIÓN ORIGINARIA DEL PUEBLO KICHWA DE SARAYAKU (2003). El libro de la vida de Sarayaku para defender nuestro futuro. In: Hidalgo‐Capitán AL, Guillén García A, Deleg Guazha N (eds). Sumaq Kawsay Yuyay. Antología del Pensamiento Indigenista Ecuatoriano sobre Sumaq Kawsay. CIM/PYDLOS/FIUCUHU, Huelva/Cuenca, pp. 77-102.
TILZEY M (2019). Authoritarian populism and neo-extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the unresolved agrarian question and the prospects for food sovereignty as counter-hegemony. The Journal of Peasant Studies 46(3):626-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1584191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1584191
TOCTAGUANO K (2019). Impacto económico del Tren Crucero en las comunidades por las que transita. Caso: Nizag y Palacio Real. Siembra 6(1):109-155. https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v6i1.1711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v6i1.1711
UNCETA SATRUSTEGUI K (2020). Decrecimiento y Buen Vivir. ¿Paradigmas convergentes? Debates sobre el postdesarrollo en Europa y América Latina. Revista de Economía Mundial (35). https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i35.4748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i35.4748
VAN NORREN DE (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals viewed through Gross National Happiness, Ubuntu, and Buen Vivir. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 20(3):431-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09487-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09487-3
VAN NORREN DE, SEEHAWER M (2025). The Future of Sustainable Development Goals and Culture: Addressing Missing Dimensions from Four Cosmovisions African Ubuntu, Latin-American Buen Vivir, Buddhist Happiness and Nordic Sami Arbediehtu. The European Journal of Development Research 37(5):861-884. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-025-00708-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-025-00708-6
VAN TEIJLINGEN K, HOGENBOOM B (2016). Debating Alternative Development at the Mining Frontier: Buen Vivir and the Conflict around El Mirador Mine in Ecuador. Journal of Developing Societies 32(4):382-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X16667190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X16667190
VANHULST J, BELING AE (2014). Buen vivir: emergent discourse within or beyond sustainable development? Ecological Economics 101:54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.017
VANHULST J, CUBILLO-GUEVARA AP, BELING AE, HIDALGO-CAPITÁN AL (2020). Los discursos políticos latinoamericanos sobre el buen vivir (1992-2017). Ayer: Revista de Historia Contemporánea 119(3):163-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55509/ayer/119-2020-07
VILLALBA U (2013). Buen Vivir vs Development: A paradigm shift in the Andes? Third World Quarterly 34(8):1427-1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.831594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.831594
VILLALBA-EGUILUZ CU, ETXANO I (2017). Buen Vivir vs Development (II): The Limits of (Neo-)Extractivism. Ecological Economics 138:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.010
VILLALBA-EGUILUZ U, PÉREZ-DE-MENDIGUREN JC (2019). La economía social y solidaria como vía para el buen vivir. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo = Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 8(1):106-136. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.338
VITERI GUALINGA C (2002). Visión indígena del desarrollo en la Amazonía. Polis. Revista Latinoamericana (3). http://journals.openedition.org/polis/7678, accessed November 6, 2019.
VITERI GUALINGA CE (2003). Sumaq Kausai. Una respuesta viable al desarrollo. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aurelio García García
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
