Espacios públicos ‘desplazados’ en ciudades ucranianas: aumento de la diversidad y la inclusión en la reconstrucción urbana a través de la ocupación temporal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2024229877Palabras clave:
procesos urbanos colectivos, espacio público, temporalidad, patrimonio inmaterial, urbicidio, desplazados internos, reconstrucción urbanaResumen
Esta investigación aborda las trágicas consecuencias del “urbicidio,” la destrucción deliberada de los entornos urbanos. Mientras que el “urbicidio” borra el patrimonio físico y cultural, los fenómenos urbanos “temporales” pueden conducir al desarrollo de un nuevo patrimonio tangible e intangible, que podría impulsar la reconstrucción y la transformación. Estos espacios urbanos temporales son el resultado de acciones colectivas que indican diversas formas de “agencia,” negociación y toma de decisiones, y pueden conducir a procesos urbanos alternativos, caracterizados por el sentido de pertenencia y la participación social a través de la “temporalidad.” A través de una metodología que aplica estudio de caso involucrando dos ciudades en Ukrania, la investigación sostiene que, si el uso temporal del espacio interactúa con su apropiación informal, esto puede conducir a un liderazgo colectivo a largo plazo y a niveles crecientes de “autonomía” en la creación de espacio urbano. Estos procesos de transformación urbana, por lo tanto, exigen acciones colectivas que respondan a las necesidades locales y al patrimonio compartido, generando espacio urbano y valores culturales. Al explorar las ciudades de Ivano-Frankivsk y Lviv, ésta investigación descubre el potencial de este nuevo patrimonio intangible, que surge del uso temporal de espacios urbanos por parte de desplazados internos (PDI), para contribuir a la reconstrucción urbana del posconflicto e identifica las condiciones bajo las cuales se puede lograr desarrollos urbanos más inclusivos y con mayor diversidad, capaces de contrarrestar los efectos del “urbicidio”.
Descargas
Citas
““Je suis Mariupol” Support Centers Network Operates in Ukraine” (V Ukraini pratsiuie merezha tsentriv pidrymky “IaMariupol”). Mariupol: Official site of the City Council. July 1, 2023. https://mariupolrada.gov.ua/news/v-ukraini-pracjue-merezha-centriv-pidtrimki-“jamariupol”-adresi.
Alirhayim, Rashad. “Place Attachment in the Context of Loss and Displacement: The Case of Syrian Immigrants in Esenyurt, Istanbul.” Journal of Urban Affairs, no. ahead-of-print (2023): 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2180378.
Berman, Marshall. “Roots, Ruins, Renewals: City Life After Urbicide.” Village Voice. September 4, 1984.
Bishop, Peter, and Lesley Williams. The Temporary City. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
Bollens, Scott A. City and Soul in Divided Societies: Epic Cultures and Urban Faultlines. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
Carrión Mena, Fernando, and Paulina Cepeda Pico. Urbicide: An Unprecedented Methodological Entry in Urban Studies? In Urbicide: the Death of the City, ed. Fernando Carrión Mena and Paulina Cepeda Pico, 3–22. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25304-1_1.
Coward, Martin. Urbicide: The Politics of Urban Destruction. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
Darling, Jonathan. “Forced Migration and the City: Irregularity, Informality, and the Politics of Presence.” Progress in Human Geography 41, no. 2 (2017): 178–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516629004.
Dixon, John, and Kevin Durrheim. “Dislocating Identity: Desegregation and the Transformation of Place.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, no. 4 (2004): 455–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.09.004.
Göler, Daniel. “Places and Spaces of the Others. A German Reception Centre in Public Discourse and Individual Perception.” In Geographies of Asylum in Europe and the Role of European Localities, ed. Birgit Glorius and Jeroen Doomernik, 69–91. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer Nature, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25666-1_4.
Guinand, Sandra, et al. Co-creative Temporary Use in Public Spaces: The process is Everything. In Unfolding Dilemmas of Urban Public Spaces, ed. Johannes Riegler and Jonas Bylund, 55–74. Recommendations by JPI Urban Europe’s AGORA. Policy paper, 2020.
Hailey, Charlie. Camps: A Guide to 21st-Century Space. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009.
Halyna, Tereshchuk. ““People’s souls ache, diseases have worsened” said a doctor from Mariupol, describing the condition of Mariupol residents.” Radio Liberty. July 24, 2022. https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/okupatsiya-mariupol-viyna-blokada/31956781.html. (In Ukrainian)
Huxtable, Ada Louise, and Robert A. Gross. “Against Urbicide.” Newsweek. New York: Newsweek Publishing LLC, August 1970.
Kalman, Harold. “Destruction, Mitigation, and Reconciliation of Cultural Heritage.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23, no. 6 (2017): 538–55.
Khalaf, Roha W. “Cultural Heritage Reconstruction after Armed Conflict: Continuity, Change, and Sustainability.” The Historic Environment 11, no. 1 (2020): 4–20.
Lahoud, Adrian. “Post-Traumatic Urbanism.” Architectural Design 80, no. 5 (2010): 14–23.
Low, Setha M., and Irwin Altman, eds. Place Attachment. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1992.
Madanipour, Ali. Cities in Time: Temporary Urbanism and the Future of the City. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2017.
Marfleet, Philip. “‘Forgotten,’ ‘Hidden’: Predicaments of the Urban Refugee.” Refuge 24, no. 1 (2007): 36–45.
Mariia, Lavriv. “The place where they gather. The residents of Kherson opened the Prostir. Coffee cafe in Frankivsk with ‘watermelon’ coffee.” ShoTam. September 25, 2022. https://shotam.info/mistse-de-zbyraiutsia-svoi-khersontsi-vidkryly-u-frankivsku-kav-iarniu-prostir-coffee-z-kavunovoiu-kavoiu.
Marko, Petra, and Radim Lisa. Meanwhile City: How Temporary Interventions Create Welcoming Places with a Strong Identity. Bratislava, Slovak Republic: Milk, 2022.
Melis, Alessandro., et al. (eds). Temporary Appropriation in Cities Human Spatialisation in Public Spaces and Community Resilience. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
Mezentsev, Kostyantyn and Oleksii Mezentsev. “War and the City: Lessons from Urbicide in Ukraine. Czasopismo Geograficzne, 93 (2022): 495–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12657/czageo-93-20.
Milligan, Melinda J. “Displacement and Identity Discontinuity: The Role of Nostalgia in Establishing New Identity Categories.” Symbolic Interaction 26, no. 3 (2003): 381–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2003.26.3.381.
Mykhailyshyna, Daria et al. “Refugees from Ukraine: who are they, how many are there and how to return them?” Final report, Centre for Economic Strategy. August 29, 2023. https://ces.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/bizhenczi-z-ukra%D1%97ni.-finalnij-zvit.pdf. (In Ukrainian)
Nunez-Ferrera, Isis et al. Idps in Towns and Cities – Working with the Realities of Internal Displacement in an Urban World. Submission to the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Internal Displacement by IIED, JIPS and UN-Habitat, 2020. https://www.un.org/internal-displacement-panel/sites/www.un.org.internal-displacement-panel/files/published_iied_jips_unh_submission.pdf.
Oswalt, Philipp et al. Urban Catalyst: The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: DOM Publisher, 2013.
Pain, Rachel. “Geotrauma: Violence, Place and Repossession.” Progress in Human Geography 45, no. 5 (2021): 972–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520943676.
Romic, Ivana Krmpotic, and Bojana Bojanic Obad Scitaroci. “Temporary Urban Interventions in Public Space.” Prostor 30, no. 2(64) (2022): 178–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31522/p.30.2(64).4.
Sanyal, Romola. “Urbanizing Refuge: Interrogating Spaces of Displacement.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38, no. 2 (2014): 558–72.
Scannell, Leila, and Robert Gifford. “Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, no. 1 (2010): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
Staničić, Aleksandar, and Milan Šijaković. “(Re)building Spaces of Tolerance: A ‘Symbiotic Model’ for the Post-War City Regeneration.” Architecture and Culture 7, no. 1 (2019): 113–28.
Susser, Ida, and Jane Schneider. Wounded Cities. In Wounded Cities: Destruction and Reconstruction in a Globalized World, ed. Ida Susser and Jane Schneider, 1–24. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2003. Retrieved August 24, 2023, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474215985.ch-001.
Szaton, Karolina Marta. “The Temporary Use as a Strategy for Transforming the Space of Contemporary Cities. Space Transformations Supported by the Purposeful Application of Temporary Use, Based on a Case Study.” Miscellanea Geographica 22, no. 4 (2018): 231–36. DOI: 10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0031.
Travlou, Penny. “From Cooking to Commoning: The Making of Intangible Cultural Heritage in OneLoveKitchen, Athens.” In Cultural Heritage in the Realm of the Commons, ed. Stelios Lekakis, 159–82. London, United Kingdom: Ubiquity Press, 2020.
UNESCO. Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris, 1972.
UNESCO. Convention for the safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris, 2003.
United Nations. Ukraine: Regional refugee response plan and flash appeal. 2022. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/92258.