Territorial energy planning: the potential for self-sufficiency in renewable energy in the territory and PDOTs

Article

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_geoph/geoph.20257712254

Keywords:

Territorial development, Territorial planning, Energy development, Electric power sector, Renewable energy

Abstract

Ecuador is a developing country experiencing consistent economic and population growth, which implies increasing demands for resources and energy. Due to environmental and economic requirements, the electrification of most energy consumption sectors has become a priority, resulting in greater pressure on electricity production at both macro and micro scales. In this context, this manuscript presents the methodology of the ongoing research project “Territorial Energy Planning: Current Situation and Methodology for the Integration of Generation and Electrical Grids into the Territory and PDOTs”, which aims to establish the potential for the development of on-site clean energy generation and distribution systems in smaller political units, integrating them into the Development and Land Use Plans (PDOTs). Based on previous analyses and studies that have identified the capacity and energy potential for harnessing solar, wind, hydro, and waste resources in other locations, there is a need for methodologies that allow for the rapid assessment of local energy resources. At the local-municipal level, it is necessary to prioritise technologies that enable adopting the best options according to the opportunities they represent, considering collateral impacts, adaptation to the environment, and social needs, and ensuring profitability and environmental integrity. This paper presents partial results of the aforementioned project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Zalamea-León, E. (2025). Territorial energy planning: the potential for self-sufficiency in renewable energy in the territory and PDOTs: Article. Geographicalia, 77, 81-96. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_geoph/geoph.20257712254