State of the Art in Language Testing: Ten Years of History or How to Deal with Assessment

Authors

  • Honesto Herrera Soler Universidad Complutense de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199711288

Abstract

A follow-up of the ten-year Language Testing (LT) history is canied out in this study. Our aim is to give a broad idea of what has been done in this Journal and whether or not it has been the forum for the assessment of language ability it intended to be over this period. Firstly we take the 1984 issues as a key moment in the ten-year history of LT, since they provide the route map to be followed and developed in subsequent issues. Then, attention is paid to the articles on Item Response Theory (IRT), a thread that runs through this whole journal, and to the research on TOEFL, which is seen as a second thread running through the texture of LT. Finally, contributions on authenticity, self-assessment, extralinguistic factors and testing techniques are considered. On the whole, it can be concluded that the range of topics discussed over these ten years make up the real state of the art in language testing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADAMS, R. J. et al. 1987. "A Latent Trait Method for Measuring a Dimension in Second Language Proficiency." Language Testing (LT) 4: 9-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400102

ALDERSON, J. C. 1988. "Testing and its Administration in ESP." In ESP in the Classroom: Practice and Evaluation. (ELT Document [28). Ed. D. Chamberlain and R. J. Baumgardner. Modern English Publications / The British Council. 87-97.

ALLAN, A. 1992. "Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Test-Wiseness in EL/ESL Reading Test Takers.* LT 9: 101-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900201

AMER, A. A. 1993. "Teaching EFL Students to Use a Test-Taking Strategy." LT 10: 71-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000104

BACHMAN, L. F.. et al. 1988. *Task and Ability Analysis as a Basis for Examining Content and Construct Comparability in Two EFL Proficiency Test Batteries." LT 5: 128-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500203

BACHMAN, L. F., and A. S. PALMER. 1989. "The Construct Validation of Self-Rating of Communicative Language Ability." LT 6: 14-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600104

BOLDT, R. F. 1989. *Latent Structure Analysis of the Test of English as a Foreign Language.* LT 6: 123-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600201

---. 1992. "Crossvalidation of Item Response Curve Models Using TOEFL Data." LT 9: 79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900106

Techniques." LT, LT S, 19-48.

---. 1990. "Short-cut Estimators of Criterion-referenced Test Consistency." LT 7: 77-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700106

---. 1993. "What Are the Characteristies of Natural Cloze Tests?" LT 10: 93-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000201

BUTLER, C. 1985. Statistics in Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

CARMAN, R. A., and W. R. ADAMS. 1972. Siudy Skills: A Student's Guide for Survival. New York: Wiley.

CARROLL, J. 1986. "LT+ 25, and Beyond? Comments." LT 3: 123-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300202

CHAPELLE, C. A. 1988. *Field Independence: A Source of Language Test Variance?" LT 5: 62-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500105

CHIHARA, T. et al. 1989. "Background and Culture as Factors in ERL Reading Comprehension." LT 6: 143-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600202

CHOI, I., and L. F. BACHMAN. 1992. "An Investigation into the Adequacy of Three IRT Models for Data from two EFL Reading Tests." LT 9: 51-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900105

DAVIDSON, F., and G. HENNING. 1985. "A Self-Rating Scale of E. Difficulty: Rasch Scalar Analysis of Items and Rating Categories." LT 2: 164-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200205

DAVIES, A. 1984. "Validating Three Tests of English Language Proficiency." LT 1,: 50-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100105

DE JON, H. A. L., and C. A. W. GLASS. 1987. "Validation of Listening Comprehension Tests Using Item Response Theory." LT 4: 170-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400204

DE MAURO, G. 1992. "Examination of the Relationships among TSE, TWE and TOEFL Scores." LT 9: 149-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900203

DEKEYSER, R. 1990. "Towards a Valid Measurement of Monitored Knowledge." LT 7: 147-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700202

DORNYEI, Z., and L. KATONA. 1992. "Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL Learners." LT 9: 187-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900206

FREEDLE, R., and KOSTIS. 1993. "The Prediction of TOEFL Reading item Difficulty: Implications for Construct Validity." LT 10: 133-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000203

HALE, G. A. 1988. "Student Major Field and Text Content: Interactive Bffects on Reading Comprehension in the Test of English as a Foreign Language." LT 5: 49-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500104

HALE, G. A., et al. 1989. "The Relation of Multiple-choice Cloze Items to the Test of English as a Foreign Language." LT 6: 47-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600106

HATCH, E., and A. LAZARATON. 1991. The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. New York: Newbury House.

HAUGHTON, D., and L. DICKINSON. 1988. "Collaborative Assessment by Marking Candidates in a Tutor Based System." LT 5: 233-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500208

HEILENMAN, L. K. 1990. "Seif-Assessment of Second Language Ability: The Role of Response Effects.* LT 7: 174-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700204

HENNING, G. 1984. "Advantages of Latent Trait Measurement in Language Testing." LT 1: 123-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100201

---. 1988. "The Influence of Test and Sample Dimensionality on Latent Trait Person ability Item Difficulty Calibrations." LT 5: 83-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500106

---. 1989. "Meanings and Implications of the Principle of Local Independence." LT 6: 95-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600108

HENNINO, G. et al. 1985.

---. Item Response Theory and the Assumption of Unidimensionality for Language Tests." LT 2: 141-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200203

HUDSON, T. 1993. "Surrogate Indices for Item Information Functions in Criterion-Referenced Language Testing." LT 10: 171-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000204

HUDSON, T., and B. LYNCH. 1984. "A Criterion-referenced Measurement Approach to ESL Achievement Testing. LT 1: 171-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100204

JAFARPUR, A. 1987. "The Short-context Technique: An Alternative for Testing Reading." LT 4: 195-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400205

JANSEEN, V. D. 1989. "The Development of a Test of Dutch as a Second Language: The Validity of Self- Assessment by Inexperienced Subjects." LT 6: 30-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600105

JONZ, J. 1991. "Cloze Item Types and Second Language Comprehension." LT 8; 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229100800102

KLEIN-BRALEY, C. 1985. "A Cloze-Up on the C-Test: A Study in the Construct Validation of Authentic Tests." LT 2: 76-104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200108

KLEIN-BRALEY, C., and U. RAATZ. 1984. "A Survey of Research on the C-Test." LT 1: 134-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100202

KRZANOWSKI, W. J., and A. WooDs. 1984. "Statistical Aspects of Reliability in Language Testing." LT 1: 1-20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100102

KOKKOTA, V. 1988. "Letter Deletion Procedure: a Flexible Way of Reducing Text Redundancy." LT 5: 111-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500108

LADO, R. 1986. "Analysis of Native Speaker Performance on a Cloze Test." LT 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300203

McNAMARA, T. F. 1990. *Item Response Theory and the Validation of an ESP Test for Health Professionals." LT 7: 52-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700105

---. 1991. "Test Dimensionality: IRT Analysis of ESP Listening Test." LT 8; 139-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229100800204

MEARA, P., and B. BUXTON. 1987. "An Alternative to Multiple Choice Vocabulary Tests." LT 4: 142-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400202

OLLER, J. W., and C. A. CONRAD. 1975. "The Cloze Technique and ESL Proficiency." Language Learning 21: 183-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1971.tb00057.x

OLSHTAIN, E., and S. BLUM-KULKA. 1985. *Crosscultural Pragmatics and the Testing of Communicative Competence." LT 2: 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200103

OSCARSSON, M. 1989. "Self-assessment of Language Proficiency: Rationale and Application." LT 6: 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600103

PERKINS, K., and L. D. MILLER. 1984. *Comparative Analyses on Item Responses." LT 1: 21-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228400100103

POLLIT, A., and C. HUTCHINSON. 1987. "Calibrating Graded Assessments: Rasch Partial Credit Analysis of Performance in Writing.* LT 4: 72-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400107

POWERS, D. E. "Academic Demands Related to Listening Skills." LT 3: 1-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300101

RASCH, G. 1980. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: U of Chicago P. (First pub. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960).

RYAN, K. B. and L. F. BACHMAN 1992. "Differential Item Functioning on Two Tests of EFL. Proficiency.* LT 9: 12-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900103

SANG, F., et al. 1986. "Models of Second Language Competence: A Structural Equation Approach." LT 3: 54-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300103

SELIGER, H. W. 1985. 'Testing Authentic Language: The Problem of Meaning." 2: 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200102

SCOTT, M. L. 1986. "Student Affective Reactions to Oral Language Tests." LT 3: 99-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300105

SHOHAMY, E. and T. REVES. 1985. "Authentic Language Texts. Where from and Where ta?" LT 2: 48-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200106

SPOLSKY, B. 1985. "The Limits of Authenticity in Language Testing." LT 2, 31- 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200104

SPOLSKY, B. 1990. "The Prehistory of TOEFL." LT 7: 98-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700107

SWAIN, M. 1993. "Second Language Testing and Second Language Acquisition: Is There a Conflict with Traditional Psychometrics!". LT 10: 193-210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000205

THEUNISSEN, T. J. J, M. 1987. "Text Banking and Test Design." LT 4: 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228700400101

TOMLINSON, B., et al. 1988. "An Algorithmic Approach to Prescriptive Assessment in English as a Second Language." LT 5: 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500101

WEIR, C., and J. ROBERTS. 1994. Evaluation in ELT. Oxford, Blackwell.

WOODS, A., and R. BAkeR. 1985. "Item Response Theory." LT 2: 119-140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200202

WOODs, A., et al. 1986. Statistics in Language Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

ZEIDNER, M. 1986. "Are English Lnguago Aptitudes Tests Biased Toward Culturally Different Minority Groups? Some Istaeli Finding." LT 3: 80-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228600300104

ZEIDNER, M., and M. BENSOUSSAN. 1988. "College Students' Attitudes towards Written versus Oral Test of English as a Foreign Language.* LT S: 100-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500107

Published

1997-12-31

How to Cite

Herrera Soler, H. (1997). State of the Art in Language Testing: Ten Years of History or How to Deal with Assessment. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 18, 115–137. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199711288

Issue

Section

Articles