The Politics of Technical Assistance in Regional Integration Processes: Mesoamerican Insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.192Keywords:
regional integration, environmental policy process, Mesoamerican Project, South-South Cooperation, sustainable developmentAbstract
This paper analyses a regional integration process that includes Belize, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico and Panama. Formally launched in 2001 as the Puebla-Panama Plan (PPP) with a strong commitment to sustainable development and safeguarding the environmental dimension of the regionalisation process, its current version, renamed the Mesoamerican Project (Proyecto Mesoamérica, PM), does not have the same orientation or goals. This paper addresses two questions: a) which stakeholders and discourses shaped the regional integration’s environmental policy process during its different phases? and b) how have the PPP and PM contributed to the environmental governance of the region? The findings suggest that the process has been characterised by strong intervention on the part of supra-national stakeholders that have prioritised liberalisation over the sustainable development agenda for 15 years, weakening regional environmental agencies’ ability to produce warrants to reduce the environmental impacts of regionalisation.
Downloads
References
ÁLVAREZ A, BARREDA A, BARTRA, A (2001). Economía Política del Plan Puebla Panamá. Itaca, Ciudad de México.
ALMAGUER-KALIXTO P (2008). The politics of sustainable development: Analysing exclusion at multiple levels in the environmental policy process. Doctoral Thesis, University of East Anglia
ALMAGUER-KALIXTO P, AMOZURRUTIA J MARCUELLO J (2014). Analyzing policy processes as complex systems: The case of Mesoamerican Sustainable Development Initiative. Journal of Sociocybernetics 12(2): 31 - 52
ATTOLINI A, BRAMBILA R (2008). Intercambio y fronteras en el Posclásico tardío en Mesoamérica. In: Medina A, Ochoa A (eds). Etnografía de los Confines Centro de Estudios Mexicanos y Centroamericanos, INAH, UNAM, Ciudad de México, pp 113-133
BALSIGER J (2011). New environmental regionalism and sustainable development. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12(1):44-48
BARREDA A (2001). Los peligros del Plan Puebla Panamá. In: Bartra, A. (ed) Mesoamérica, los ríos Profundos: Alternativas plebeyas al Plan Puebla Panamá. Instituto Maya, México
BARTRA A (2001). Mesoamérica, los ríos Profundos: Alternativas plebeyas al Plan Puebla Panamá. Instituto Maya, México
BLAIKIE P, MULDAVIN J (2004). Policy as warrant: environment and development in the Himalayan region. The East–West Center Working Papers, Environmental Change, Vulnerability, and Governance, Series, No. 59, University of Hawaii, Hawaii.1-35
BOONE E, MIGNOLO W (1994) (Ed) Writing Without Words. Duke University Press, Durham, USA
BOOZ, ALLEN and HAMILTON (2000). Iniciativa para la integración de la infraestructura básica entre México y los países del Istmo Centroamericano. Inter-American Development Bank, Mexico City, November 2000
BRÜLHART M, TORSTENSSON J (1998). Regional Integration, Scale Economies and Industry Location in the European Union. In: CEPR Discussion Paper no. 1435. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London
BULL B (1999). New regionalism in Central America. In: Third World Quarterly, 20(5): 957-970
BULL B (2002). Between Bush and Bolivar: The Puebla-Panama Plan and the re-imagining of Mesoamerica. Paper presented to Working group 23: regions and regionalisation. Nordic political Science Association/ Nordic International Studies Associations Annual Meeting, Aalborg, 15–17 August, 2002
CAPDPONT JL (2011). Mesoamérica o el Proyecto Mesoamérica: la historia como pretexto. LuminaR, 9 (1), 132– 152
CARTER N (2001). The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. University Press, Cambridge UK
CEPAL (2015). Una mirada Proyecto Mesoamérica. Documento elaborado para la XV Cumbre del Mecanismo de Diálogo y Concertación de Tuxtla. CEPAL, Guatemala
COVARRUBIAS A (2013). La política exterior de Calderón: objetivos y acciones, Foro Internacional, (213-214), 455-482
DEVLIN R, ESTEVADEORDAL A (2001). What is the New Regionalism in the Americas? In: Bulmer-Thomas V (2001). Regional integration in Latin America and the Caribbean: the political economy of Open regionalism. Institute of Latin American Studies, London
DRYZEK JS (1997). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford University Press, Oxford
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (1999). Centroamérica: evaluación de los daños ocasionados por el huracán Mitch, sus implicaciones para el desarrollo económico y social y el medio ambiente. (LC/MEX/L.375) United Nations Publications, Ciudad de México
FAIRCLOUGH N (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Cambridge UK
FLEISHMAN-HILLARD (2003). Puebla Panamá-Plan. Análisis de Clima de opinión regional y recomendación. Washington 122 pgs
FLORESCANO E (1994). Memory, Myth, and Time in Mexico: From the Aztecs to Independence. University of Texas Press, Austin USA
GIANNIAS D, SFAKIANAKI E (2011). Regional and Environmental Effects of the EU Enlargement and Euro Zone. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 11(2), 5-20
GIBBS D, JONAS A, WHILE A (2002). Changing governance structures and the environment: economy-environment relations at the local and regional scales. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 4(2), 123-138
GOBIERNO DE NICARAGUA (2001). Decreto No. 25-2001 que establece la política ambiental y aprueba el plan ambiental de Nicaragua 2001-2005. Gaceta No. 44 del 02 de Marzo
HAJER M, WAGENAAR, H (eds) (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
HAWKINS CV, WANG X (2013). Policy Integration for Sustainable Development and the Benefits of Local Adoption. Cityscape: A Journal Of Policy Development And Research, 15(1), 63-82.
HIERNAUX-NICOLAS D (2002). El Plan Puebla Panamá: una nueva visión de desarrollo regional? Conference presented in November, 20. Groupe de Recherche sur l´integration continentale, Université du Quebec, Montreal.
HVEEM H (2000). Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalization. In Stubbs R and Geoffrey R Underhill D (eds). Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 70-81
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (1999a). Consultative Group. Meeting for the Reconstruction and Transformation of Central America. Reports of Conceptual Workshops. Workshop on Ecological and Social Vulnerability Stockholm, Sweden 25-28 May 1999
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (1999b) Consultive Group Meeting for the Reconstruction and Transformation of Central America. Stockholm. Technical Working Group on Trade
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (1999c) The Stockholm Declaration of the Consultive Group Meeting for the Reconstruction and Transformation of Central America. Stockholm. 1999
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (2002) Hagamos de la Integración Mesoamericana una Realidad: Los desafíos de Mesoamérica y el Plan Puebla Panamá, IADB, Washington, DC
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (2004a) Ayuda Memoria de la Misión Especial para la Iniciativa Mesoamericana de Desarrollo Sostenible (IMDS) del Plan Puebla Panamá (PPP). Memorandum. 13 de Septiembre de 2004. RE2/EN2/109/2004
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) (2004b) Iniciativa Mesoamericana de Desarrollo Sostenible (IMDS) Plan Puebla Panamá (PPP) Revisión de Plan de Acción Sede del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (IDB) Martes 13 y miércoles 14 de abril de 2004
INCAE (Central American Institute of Business and Management) (2004). La Transversalidad del Tema Ambiental en el Plan Puebla Panamá. Análisis y recomendaciones., INCAE, Costa Rica
INCAE (Central American Institute of Business and Management) and Central American Commission on Environment and Development (CCAD) (2004). Plan Puebla Panamá, MSDI. Propuestas de Proyectos Componente Ambiental. INCAE, Managua
IMDS (Mesoamerican Sustainable Development Initiative) (2003). Mesoamerican Sustainable Development Initiative, Memorandum of Understanding. Puebla Panamá Plan, El Salvador
JORDAN A (2002). (Ed) Environmental policy in the European Union: actors, institutions and processes. Earthscan, London UK
JAYASURIYA K (1994). Singapore: The Politics of Regional Definition, The Pacific Review 7 (4): 411-20.
KEELEY J, SCOONES I (1999). Understanding environmental policy process: A review. Working Paper No. 89. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton UK
KERN K (2011). Governance for Sustainable Development in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Baltic Studies, 42(1), 21
KIMANI N (2010). A Collaborative Approach to Environmental Governance in East Africa. Journal Of Environmental Law, 22(1), 27-57
KIRCHHOFF P (1943). Mesoamérica. Sus Límites Geográficos, Composición Étnica y Caracteres Culturales. In: Acta Americana 1(1): 92–107
KIRCHHOFF P (1960) Mesoamérica, sus límites geográficos, composición étnica y caracteres culturales. 2a ed. SEP-INAH-ENAH, México
KUWAYAMA M (1999). Open Regionalism in Asia Pacific and Latin America: A Survey of Literature, CEPAL, International Trade and Development Finance Division, Santiago.
LARGE W (2005) An Enduring Partnership for development. Central America and the IDB since 1990. Inter-American Development Bank: Washington
LEAL E (2002) Presentación de la IMDS, Madrid 11, 12 noviembre 2002
LEVI S, KESSEL G, DAVILA E (2000) El sur también existe: un ensayo sobre el Desarrollo regional de México. 19 de julio de 2000. Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores, México
LINDBLOM CE (1968) The Policy-making process. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
MARSH D, RHODES R (1992). Policy Networks in British Government, Allen & Unwin, London
MARTINEZ J, SANDOVAL E (2011) Agua, desarrollo y conflicto dentro del Plan Puebla Panamá. Ra Ximhai - Revista De Sociedad, Cultura, Desarrollo, 7 (1), 133–151
MCELHINNY V, NICKINSON S (2005). Plan Puebla-Panamá: recipe for development or disaster? Washington, DC: InterAction IDB Civil Society Initiative
MILLAN N (2010). La coherencia de políticas para el desarrollo en España: desafíos, percepciones, intereses y resistencias institucionales. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo/Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 3(2), 6–25
MSDI (Mesoamerican Sustainable Development Initiative) (2003). Memorandum of Understanding For the coordination of the Mesoamerican Sustainable Development Initiative (MSDI) of the Plan Puebla-Panama (Washington D.C. – June 2, 2003)
NAVARRETE R (2010). Gobernabilidad neoliberal y movimientos indígenas en América Latina. Polis (Santiago), 9(27), 481–500
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006). The Mesoamerican Region - Southeastern Mexico and Central America. Territorial reviews
RIGGIROZZI P (2015). Regionalism, Activism, and Rights: New Opportunities for Health Diplomacy in South America. Review Of International Studies, 41(2), 407-428
ROBINSON J (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. In: Ecological Economics, 48, 369-338
SCHIFF M, WINTERS A (2003). Regional Integration and Development. World Bank, Washington
SCOBIE M (2016). Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean Small Island Developing States. Environmental Science and Policy, 5816-28
SCOONES I, KEELEY J (2003). Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa, Earthscan Publications, London
SICA (Sistema de Integración Centroamericana) (2001) Transformación y modernización de Centroamérica en el Siglo XXI. Una propuesta Regional. Available in http://www.sica.int/cdoc/publicaciones/transform/anexo/completo_sp.pdf
SICA (Sistema de Integración Centroamericana), CCAD (Comisión Centroamericana de Ambiente y Desarrollo) (2006). Acuerdo Voluntario para una Conducta Ambiental Sostenible en iniciativas regionales de Desarrollo en el Marco del Plan Puebla Panama. Reunión del Consejo de Ministros de la CCAD. Ciudad de Panama 28 de Abril 2006
SOSNOWSKA J (2006). Política exterior de México: dimensión regional e internacional. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Centro Coordinador y Difusor de Estudios Latinoamericanos, Ciudad de México
SPINDLER M (2002). New regionalism and the contruction of Global order. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR working paper no. 93/02 March) 31 pgs
SUTTON R (1999). The policy process: an overview. Working paper 118. Overseas Development Institute, London UK
TORRES R (2001). Conectividad de la Propuesta Regional de Transformación y Modernización de Centroamérica y del Plan Puebla Panamá. Informe Preliminar. Grupo Técnico Interinstitucional para el Plan Puebla-Panamá (BCIE-BID-CEPAL/UN), Washington
TOUSSAINT M (2014). México en Centroamérica: del activismo de los años ochenta a la nueva agenda del siglo XXI. Cuadernos Inter.c.a.mbio sobre Centroamérica y El Caribe
(1):173-203
UNITED NATIONS (2015). Launch of new sustainable development agenda to guide development actions for the next 15 years. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?page=view&nr=1021&type=230&menu=2059, accesed 10 February 2016
VILLAFUENTE D, LEYVA X (Eds) (2006) Geoeconomía y geopolítica en el área del Plan Puebla Panamá. CIESAS-PORRUA-Cámara de Diputados LIX Legislatura, México
WEBER M, DRIESSEN PJ (2010). Environmental Policy Integration: The Role of Policy Windows in the Integration of Noise and Spatial Planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(6), 1120-1134
YIN R (1993). Applications of case study research, Sage, London
YIN R (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, London
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Patricia Eugenia Almaguer-Kalixto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
