Indigenous Gold Mining in the Kenkuim Shuar Community: A Decolonial and Postcapitalist Approach to Sustainability

Authors

  • Rickard Lalander Södertörn University (Sweden)
  • María Beatriz Eguiguren-Riofrío Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja/UTPL (Ecuador)
  • Ana Karina Vera Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja/UTPL (Ecuador)
  • Gabriela Espinosa Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja/UTPL (Ecuador)
  • Maleny Reyes Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja/UTPL (Ecuador)
  • Magnus Lembke Stockholm University (Sweden)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.570

Keywords:

postcapitalism, resistance-adaptation, Shuar community, sustainable indigenous mining, Congüime, decoloniality

Abstract

This article analyzes the experiences of the small Shuar community of Kenkuim (Congüime) in the Ecuadorian Amazon that since 2016 carries out gold mining through the communitarian company Exploken Minera. The case is unique in South America, not only for being the only
example of indigenous mining granted formal state concession, but also for its green profile, without the usage of chemicals or heavy metals. Within a setting of expanding extractivism conditioned
by global capitalism and a theoretical framework of a decolonial and postcapitalist approach to sustainability, this ethnographic study deals with the expressions of resistance and adaptation of
the Kenkuim community and how socio-cultural, ecological, and economic values are articulated by Shuar actors in relation to the new indigenous mining project. The results indicate that this mining experiment constitutes a meaningful alternative to destructive extractivism in line with decolonial and postcapitalist reasoning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADAMS WM (2009). Green development: environment and sustainability in a developing world. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon/New York.

ÁLVAREZ L, COOLSAET B (2020). Decolonizing Environmental Justice Studies: A Latin American Perspective. Capitalism Nature Socialism 31(2):50-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272, access May 13, 2020.

ASTUDILLO BANEGAS J (2020). Prácticas del Buen Vivir. Experiencias en comunidades shuar, kichwa y manteña. Abya-Yala and Universidad de Cuenca, Quito.

BUSTAMANTE T (1988). Larga lucha del Kakaram contra el Sucre. Abya-Yala, Quito.

CHIESURA A, DE GROOT R (2002). Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 44(2-3):219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00275-6, access November 3, 2020.

CHUJI M (2010). El Sumak Kawsay: una opción de vida. http://www.miradoriu.org/spip.php?article168, access November 18, 2019.

CONTRALORÍA GENERAL DEL ESTADO (2012). DIAPA-0027-2012. República del Ecuador, Quito. https://www.planv.com.ec/sites/default/files/informe_contraloria_mirador.pdf, access, June 23, 2020.

DRYZEK JS (2013). The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

EL COMERCIO (2010). El Shuar alquila sus tierras por oro, September 22. https://www.elcomercio.com/actualidad/ecuador/Shuar-alquila-tierras-oro.html, access February 3, 2019.

EL TELÉGRAFO (2012). Quishpe auspició una exploración minera con apoyo de Holanda, March 21. https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/actualidad/1/quishpe-auspicio-una-exploracion-minera-con-apoyo-de-holanda, access February 3, 2019.

EL TELÉGRAFO (2014). Los shuar reanudan la operación en minas, May 30. https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/regional/1/los-Shuar-reanundan-la-operacion-en-minas, access May 15, 2019.

EL UNIVERSO (2012). Amazónicos de Ecuador limpian pozas con mercurio, March 14. https://www.eluniverso.com/2012/03/14/1/1430/amazonicos-ecuador-limpian-pozas-mercurio.html, accessed June 18, 2019.

EPA (n. d.). Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Without Mercury. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/artisanal-and-small-scale-gold-mining-without-mercury#gravity, access June 1, 2020.

ESCOBAR A (2006). Difference and Conflict in the Struggle Over Natural Resources: A Political Ecology Framework. Development 49(3):6-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100267, access September 17, 2019.

EXPLOKEN MINERA (2018). Rendición de cuentas de Exploken Minera. Compañía de Explotación Minera Exploken Minera S.A., Congüime.

FERNÁNDEZ-SALVADOR C (2018). The Shuar and large-scale mining in Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador: a study of ethnopolitics and the struggle over natural resources. Doctoral Thesis. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.

GIBSON-GRAHAM JK (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

GUDYNAS E (2015). Extractivismos. Ecología, economía y política de un modo de entender el desarrollo y la Naturaleza. CLAES, CEDIB, Cochabamba.

JACKSON JE, WARREN KB (2005). Indigenous Movements in Latin America, 1992-2004: Controversies, Ironies, New Directions. Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1):549-573. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120529, access May 13, 2020.

KARSTEN R (2000). La vida y la cultura de los Shuar: cazadores de cabezas del Amazonas occidental: la vida y la cultura de los Jíbaros del este del Ecuador. Abya-Yala, Quito.

LA HORA (2005). Colombianos controlan y dirigen áreas mineras, June 21. https://www.lahora.com.ec/noticia/1000335778/colombianos-controlan-y-dirigen-c3a1reas-mineras, access June 20, 2019.

LA HORA (2012). Minería sigue preocupando en Congüime, August 6. https://lahora.com.ec/noticia/1101373236/minerc3ada-sigue-preocupando-en-Congüime, access June 28, 2019.

LALANDER R (2014). Rights of nature and the indigenous peoples in Bolivia and Ecuador: A Straitjacket for Progressive Development Politics? Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 3(2):148-173. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.137, access October 22, 2019.

LALANDER R (2016). The Ecuadorian Resource Dilemma: Sumak Kawsay or Development? Critical Sociology 42(4-5):623-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514557959, access October 22, 2019.

LALANDER R, LEMBKE M (2018). The Andean Catch-22: Ethnicity, Class and Resource Governance in Bolivia and Ecuador. Globalizations 15(5):636-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1453189, access May 12, 2020.

LALANDER R, LEMBKE M (2020). Interculturality from Below: Territoriality and Floating Indigenous Identities in Plurinational Ecuador. Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales 9:129-158. Universidad de las Américas, Quito. http://revistas.udla.edu.ec/cpri/public/index , access December 2, 2020.

LALANDER R, MERIMAA M (2018). The Discursive Paradox of Environmental Conflict: Between Ecologism and Economism in Ecuador. Forum for Development Studies 45(3):485-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2018.1427622, access September 17, 2019.

LALANDER R, EGUIGUREN RIOFRÍO MB, VERA AK, REYES M, ESPINOSA G, LEMBKE M (2020). Una ecología política de minería indígena responsable: dilemas, disputas y desafíos en la comunidad Shuar de Congüime de la Amazonía ecuatoriana. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política 11(1):66-101. https://portalrevistas.uct.cl/index.php/RDCP/article/view/2110, access July 29, 2020.

LEMBKE M, LALANDER R, GALINDO JF (2020). Objectivities and Trust in Ethnographic Research On and With Latin American Indigenous Peoples. In: Gallardo Fernández GL, Saunders F, Sokolova T (eds.). Co-creating Actionable Science: Reflections from the Global North and South. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 13-33.

MARTÍNEZ-ALIER J (2004) Ecological Distribution Conflicts and Indicators of Sustainability. International Journal of Political Economy 34(1):13-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2004.11042914, access October 27, 2020.

MIGNOLO WD (2007). Delinking: the rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies 21(2-3):449-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647, access October 3, 2020.

MIGNOLO WD (2016). Sustainable Development or Sustainable Economies? Ideas towards Living in Harmony and Plenitude. Dialogue of Civilizations. DOC Research Institute.

MIGNOLO WD (2017). Coloniality Is Far from Over, and So Must Be Decoloniality. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry 43:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1086/692552, access October 3, 2020.

MINERÍA EN LÍNEA (2016). Gobierno entregará concesión minera a comunidad Río Congüime. https://mineriaenlinea.com/2016/06/gobierno-entregara-concesion-minera-comunidad-rio-conguime/ , access June 28, 2019.

MINISTERIO DE MINERÍA (2016). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo del Sector Minero. Quito: Ministerio de Minería; Agencia de Regulación y Control Minero; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Geológico Minero Metalúrgico. http://www.competencias.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/04PPP2016-PLAN.pdf, access February 4, 2019.

MINISTERIO DEL AMBIENTE (2016). Valoración de pasivos ambientales: informe de evaluación del daño ambiental. Caso: Minería ilegal de Congüime. Programa de Reparación Ambiental y Social-PRAS, Ministerio del Ambiente, Quito.

QUIJANO A (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality, Cultural Studies 21(2-3):168-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353, access October 3, 2020.

REPÚBLICA DEL ECUADOR (2008). Constitución Política del Ecuador (2008). Asamblea Nacional Constituyente, Montecristi.

SACHER W (2015). Minería de oro en el Ecuador. Entre actores nacionales y transnacionales. In: Poveda P, Córdova H, Pulido A, Sacher W, De Oliveira LJ, Daró E, Marchegiani P (eds.). La economía del oro: ensayos sobre la explotación en Sudamérica. CEDLA, La Paz, pp. 95-132.

SÁNCHEZ-VÁSQUEZ L, ESPINOSA G, EGUIGUREN MB (2016). «Golden reality» or the «reality of gold»: artisanal mining and socio-environmental conflict in Chinapintza, Ecuador. The Extractive Industries and Society 3(1):124-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.004, access November 21, 2019.

SENPLADES (2009). Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2009-2013: Construyendo un Estado Plurinacional e Intercultural. Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo, Quito.

SENPLADES (2013). Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2013-2017. Todo el mundo mejor. Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo, Quito.

SVAMPA M (2019). Las fronteras del neoextractivismo en América Latina. Conflictos socioambientales, giro ecoterritorial y nuevas dependencias. Bielefeld University Press/FLACSO-Ecuador/Universidad de Guadalajara, Transcript Verlag, Germany.

SWEDBERG R (2016). Before theory comes theorizing or how to make social science more interesting. The British Journal of Sociology 67(1):5-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12184, access January 31, 2020.

VITERI GUALINGA C (2003). Súmak Káusai. Una respuesta viable al desarrollo. B.A. thesis. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador, Quito.

YANARELLA EJ, LEVINE RS (1992), Does sustainable development lead to sustainability? Futures 24(8):759-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(92)90105-O , access November 3, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-05

How to Cite

Lalander, R., Eguiguren-Riofrío, M. B. ., Vera, A. K., Espinosa, G. ., Reyes, M., & Lembke, M. (2021). Indigenous Gold Mining in the Kenkuim Shuar Community: A Decolonial and Postcapitalist Approach to Sustainability. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies, 10(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.570

Issue

Section

Articles