Women’s contribution to the deconstruction of xixth-century scientific-medical discourse misogyny

Authors

  • Pilar Iglesias Aparicio Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_filanderas/fil.202055016

Keywords:

Scientific-medical Discourse, XIXth Century, Sexual Difference, Mental Health, Neurosexism

Abstract

For the last four decades, a great number of studies have been published about the construction of xixth century scientific-medical discourse about women’s bodies, health and sexuality, which presented women as weak and sick beings, dependent on their sexual organs and physiological functions, so proving their natural inferiority. The obsessive pursuit of the relationship between brain and female sexual organs and the sexual difference in mind functions reinforced the rejection to women’s access to higher education. The impossibility of women to access universities and other scientific institutions, facilitated that the voice of scientific-medical knowledge was mostly male. However, the xixth century women’s movement promoted women’s access to knowledge and professional practice. This paper shows some women scientists’ contribution to the deconstruction of the misogynistic hegemonic discourse, mainly Elizabeth Garrett and Mary Putnam, MD.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-24

How to Cite

Iglesias Aparicio, P. (2020). Women’s contribution to the deconstruction of xixth-century scientific-medical discourse misogyny. Filanderas, (5). https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_filanderas/fil.202055016

Issue

Section

Studies