Unreliable Narration and (Dis-)Orientation in the Postmodern Neo-Gothic Novel: Reflections on Patrick McGrath's The Grotesque (1989)

Authors

  • Heinz Antor University of Cologne, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.200110263

Keywords:

Narratology, Neogothic novel, Cultural studies, Postmodernism

Abstract

This article analyses the forms and functions of unreliable narration in a postmodern neogothic novel and thus tries to view the phenomenon of the unreliable narrator not merely from the point of view of the narratologist intending to devise a watertight descriptive definition of the technique and to place it consistently within-a conceptual framework. Rather, narratology and cultural studies are to be brought together here in an attempt at determining the cultural functions of a special form of narrative in a historical situation often described as plural, fragmented and devoid ofa centre, i.e. one creating problems of orientation. Unreliable narration thus turns out to be a useful tool in the artistic process of coping with the postmodern condition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLRATH, Gaby. 1998. “But why will you say that | am mad? Textuelle Signale fir die Ermittlung voN unreliable narration”. In Niinning. 1998: 59-79.

ANTOR, Heinz. 1992. “Ethical Plurivocity; or, The Pleasures and Rewards of Reading”. In Ahrens, Riidiger and Heinz Antor. (eds.). Text-Culture-Reception: Cross-Cultural Aspects of English Studies. Heidelberg: Universitatsverlag C. Winter: 40. :

—. 1996. “The Ethics of Criticism in the Age After Value”. In Volkmann, Laurenz and Riidiger Ahrens. (eds.). Why Literature Matters: Theories and Functions of Literature. Heidelberg: Universitatsverlag C. Winter: 65-85.

—. 1997. “Sozialisation zwischen Norm und Tabubruch: lan McEwans Roman The Cement Garden als Lektiire im Leistungskurs Englisch”. LWU 30, 4: 267-286.

—. 1998. “The Arts, the Sciences, and the Making of Meaning. Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia as a Post-Structuralist Play”. Anglia 116, 3: 326-354.

—. 2000. “Is there a Ship on the Horizon? Notes on the Ethics of Dennis Potter’s New Humanist Postmodernism in Sufficient Carbohydrate”. In Gras, Vernon W. and John R. Cook. (eds.). 2000. The Passion of Dennis Potter: International Collected Essays. New York: St. Martin’s Press: 127-148.

BOTTING, Fred. 1996. Gothic. The New Critical idiom. London: Routledge.

CHATMAN, Seymour. 1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film. Ithaca/London: Cornell U. P.

FLUDERNIK, Monika. 1999. “Defining (In)sanity: The Narrator of The Yellow Wallpaper and the Question of Unreliability”. In Grinzweig, Walter and Andreas Solbach. (eds.). Narratologie, Rhetorik, Textlinguistik: Ein Integrationsversuch. Tubingen: Narr: 75-95.

FÜGER, Wilhelm. 1983. “Mikronarrativik”. GRM 33, 2: 179. HOF, Renate. 1980. “Das Spiel des unreliable narrator in Nabokov's Lolita”. Amerikastudien 25, 4: 418-431.

—. 1984. Das Spiel des ‘unreliable narrator’: Aspekte unglaubwirdigen Erzahlens im Werk von Viadimir Nabokov. Miinchen: Fink.

LEMONCK, Michael D. 1998. “A Dinosaur with Guts”. Time, April 6: 57.

MCGRATH, Patrick. (1989) 1990. The Grotesque. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Morrow, Bradford. 1989. “Patrick McGrath”. BOMB 28: 30-31.

NUNNING, Ansgar. 1993. “Renaissance eines anthropomorphisierten Passepartouts oder Nachruf auf.ein literaturkritisches Phanomen? Uberlegungen und Alternativen:zum Konzept des implied author’. Deutsche Vierteljahresschrift 67, 1: 1-25.

—-. 1998. Unreliable Narration: Studien zur Theorie und Praxis unglaubwiirdigen Erzdhlens in der englischsprachigen Literatur. Trier: WVT.

POE, Edgar Allan. 1967. “The Fall of the House of Usher”. In Poe, E. A. 1967. Selected Writings. Ed. D. Galloway. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

REUCK, Jenny De. 1990. “Stereoscopic Perspectives: Transmission and Reception in Unreliable Homodiegetic Narration”. AUMLA: Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association 74: 154-168.

SEDYLMAYR, Hans. (1948) 1985. Verlust der Mitte: Die bildende Kunst des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts als Symptom und Symbol der Zeit. Frankfurt/M., Berlin, Wien: Ullstein.

SHEN, Dan. 1989, “Unreliability and Characterization”. Style 23: 300-311.

SHKLOVSKY, Viktor. 1988. “Art as Technique”. In Lodge, David. (ed.). 1988. Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. London, New York: Longman: 16-30.

SIMS, Dagmar. 1998. “Die Darstellung grotesker Welten aus der Perspektive verriickter Monologisten: Eine Analyse erzahlerischer und mentalstilistischer Merkmale des Erzahlertypus mad monologist bei Edgar Allan Poe, Patrick McGrath, Ambrose Bierce und James Hogg”. In Ninning. 1998: 109-129.

TAYLOR, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.

THOMSEN, Christian W. 1974. Das Groteske im englischen Roman des 18, Jahrhunderts: Erscheinungsformen und Funktionen. Impulse der Forschung 17. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

WALL, Kathleen. 1994. “The Remains of the Day and Its Challenges to Theories of Unreliable Narration”. Journal of Narrative Technique 24: 18-24,

YACOBI, Tamar. 1981. “Fictional Reliability as a Communicative Problem”. Poetics Today 8, 2: 113-126.

YEATS, William Butler. 1974. Selected Poetry. London: Pan Books.

Downloads

Published

2001-12-31

How to Cite

Antor, H. (2001). Unreliable Narration and (Dis-)Orientation in the Postmodern Neo-Gothic Novel: Reflections on Patrick McGrath’s The Grotesque (1989). Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 24, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.200110263