“The Subaltern Ethnographer: Blurring the Boundaries through Amitav Ghosh’s Writing”

Authors

  • María Elena Martos Hueso Universidad de Jaén

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20079762

Keywords:

Amitav Ghosh, The Shadow Lines, In An Antique Land, Subaltern, Post-colonial

Abstract

This study aims to interpret Amitav Ghosh’s works as an alternative positioning within the post-colonial debate. His role as an ethnographer is particularly outstanding in this respect, and I may go as far as to suggest the figure of Calcuttaborn novelist Amitav Ghosh as incarnating the role of the subaltern anthropologist who is able to effectively contest the traditional discursive practices inspired by orientalist ethnography. Two parallel strategies will be used to achieve this objective: (1) turning ethnographic discourse from “a discourse that narrativizes” into “a discourse that narrates”, in the direction of Hayden White’s The Content of the Form; and (2) revitalising the “anthropological spirit” within Benedict Anderson’s definition of the nation as an “imagined political community”. To that purpose we will examine two relevant works in Ghosh’s early writings, The Shadow Lines (1988) and In an Antique Land (1992), as examples of the implementation of “thick description” in both literary and non-fictional texts. Ghosh’s overall strategy is to “write back to the centre” through means other than metafiction, parody or the Bakhtinian carnivalesque —i.e., strictly literary devices widely popular in current post-colonial fiction— and use the practices of contemporary anthropology —traditionally associated with Empire— in the construction of subaltern identity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDERSON, Benedict. (1983) 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso.

BHABHA, Homi K. (ed.) 1990. “DissemiNation: Time, Narrative and the Margins of the Modern Nation”. In Nation and Narration. London and New York: Routledge: 291-322.

BARAT, Urbashi. 2001. “Time in the Novels of Amitav Ghosh and Arundhati Roy: Technique as Meaning”. In Ali, S.M. (ed.) Indian Writing in English: A Critical Response. New Delhi: Creative Books: 124-136.

BOSE, Brinda. 2001. “Footnoting History: The Diasporic Imagination of Amitav Ghosh”. In Paranjape, M. (ed.) In Diaspora: Theories, Histories, Texts. New Delhi: Indialog: 235-245.

CHEW, Shirley. 2002. “Texts and Worlds in In an Antique Land”. In Bose, Brinda. (ed.) Amitav Ghosh: Critical Perspectives. Delhi: Pencraft International: 103-116.

GEERTZ, Clifford. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Oxford: Polity Press.

—. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

GHOSH, Amitav. 1988. The Shadow Lines. London: Bloomsbury.

—. 1992. In an Antique Land. London: Granta Books.

—. 1995. The Calcutta Chromosome. New York: Harper Collins.

—. 2002. The Imam and the Indian: Prose Pieces. Delhi: Ravi Dayal.

KHAIR, Tabish. 2001. Babu Fictions: Alienation In Contemporary Indian English Novels. New Delhi: Oxford U.P.

MATHUR, Suchitra. 2004. “Caught Between the Goddess and the Cyborg: Third-World Women and the Politics of Science in Three Works of Indian Science Fiction”. Journal of Commonwealth Literature 39 (3): 119-138.

MONDAL, A.A. 2003. “Allegories of Identity: ‘Postmodern’ Anxiety and ‘Postcolonial’ Ambivalence in Amitav Ghosh’s In an Antique Land and The Shadow Lines”. Journal of Commonwealth Literature 38 (3): 19-36.

MONGIA, Padmini. 2003. “Medieval Travel in Postcolonial Times: Amitav Ghosh’s in an Antique Land”. In Khair, T. (ed.) Amitav Ghosh: A Critical Companion. Delhi: Permanent Black: 73-89.

SAID, Edward W. 1994. Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage.

SILVA, Neluka and Alex TICKELL. 1997. “Amitav Ghosh in Interview”. Kunapipi 19 (3): 171-177.

WHITE, Hayden. 1987. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins U.P.

Downloads

Published

2007-12-31

How to Cite

Martos Hueso, M. E. (2007). “The Subaltern Ethnographer: Blurring the Boundaries through Amitav Ghosh’s Writing” . Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 36, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20079762