The Denotative-Referential Dimension of Lexical Items

Authors

  • Benilde Graña López Universidad de Oviedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199611041

Abstract

This paper defends the hypothesis that, along with the notion of Argument Structure, which encodes the lexical-conceptual properties of lexical predicates (i.e. the idea that the verb eat, for instance, takes two arguments, an Agent—the eater—and a Theme—the thing that is eaten—as shown in Peter ate the pizza), there is a second dimension to the meaning of lexical items. This level, which we call Denotative-Referential Structure, is concerned with the way words are embedded in the larger syntactic context (i.e. the phrase) that contains them, and are referentially constrained within that context. It is argued that this dimension must be kept separate from Argument Structure both technically and conceptually. The general theoretical framework is that of Generative Grammar and more specifically the set of assumptions that constitute Government and Binding Theory.

Display downloads

References

CHOMSKY, N. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Ed. R. Jacobs et al. Waltham (MA): Blaisdell. 184-221.

- - -. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

- - -. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

DI SCIULLO, A. M., and E. WILLIAMS. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

GONZALEZ ESCRIBANO, J. L. 1991. Una teoría de la oración. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo, Servicio de Publicaciones.

FREGE, G. 1962. Estudios sobre semántica. Barcelona: Ariel.

GRIMSHAW, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

HAEGEMAN, L. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge (MA): Blackwell.

HIGGINBOTHAM, J. 1985. “On Semantics.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547-593.

LEBEAUX, D. 1986. “The Interpretation of Derived Nominals.” Chicago Linguistic Society 22: 231-247.

LEES, R. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.

MURASUGI, K. G. 1990. “The Derivation of Derived Nominals.” MIT: Manuscript.

RADFORD, A. 1988. Transformational Grammar. A First Course. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840425

SPROAT, R. W. 1985. On Deriving the Lexicon. Doctoral Dissertation. Cambridge (MA): MIT.

VAN HOUT, A. 1990. “Deverbal Nominalization: Object versus Event-Denoting Nominals. Implications for Argument and Event Structure.” Manuscript. Tilburg University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.8.10hou

WILLIAMS, E. 1980. “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 208-238.

- - -. 1981. “Argument Structure and Morphology.” Linguistic Review 1: 81-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81

- - -. 1982. “The NP Cycle.” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 277-295.

ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859928

Downloads

Published

1996-12-31

Issue

Section

ARTICLES: Language and linguistics

How to Cite

Benilde Graña López. (1996). The Denotative-Referential Dimension of Lexical Items. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 17, 141-156. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199611041