Endophoric Signposting: A Contrastive Study of Textual References in L2 Czech Master's Theses and Native English Academic Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20249976Keywords:
metadiscourse, endophoric markers, Master’s thesis, academic discourse, cross-cultural analysisAbstract
The aim of this study is to contribute to cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary discourse analysis, shedding light on English L2 learners’ metadiscursive practices. Focusing on a specialised learner corpus of English-medium Master’s theses written by Czech university students, the research explores the occurrence of endophoric markers and their characteristics. To enable cross-linguistic and cross-cultural comparison, a reference corpus of representative L1 English academic discourse was compiled. A new taxonomy used here, which draws on Hyland’s list of endophoric markers (2005) and an extensive literature review, categorises endophoric markers into three groups: purely directional, markers using specific words, and a category combining the first two. The study investigates the occurrence and function of these markers, focusing on anaphoric, cataphoric, and non-directional references. It also aims to identify differences in the usage of endophoric markers in English between L2 novice writers and experienced L1 academic writers, providing insights into trends and patterns in the employment of endophoric markers in academic writing in a way that accounts for disciplinary and linguistic factors. The results reveal higher endophoric marker frequencies in the Master’s Thesis Corpus, suggesting distinctive discourse patterns among Czech learners using English as an L2, with a predominance of specific endophoric markers and notable cross-disciplinary variation.
Downloads
References
ABDOLLAHZADEH, Esmaeel. 2019. “A Coss-cultural Study of Hedging in Discussion Sections by Junior and Senior Academic Writers”. Ibérica 38: 177-202.
ÄDEL, Annelie. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. <https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24>.
AFZAAL, Muhammad, Muhammad Ilyas CHISHTI, Chao LIU and Chenxia ZHANG. 2021. “Metadiscourse in Chinese and American Graduate Dissertation Introductions”. Cogent Arts & Humanities: 8 (1). <https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1970879>.
BUNTON, David. 1999. “The Use of Higher Level Metatext in Ph.D. Theses”. English for Specific Purposes 18: 41-56. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2>.
BURNEIKAITĖ, Nida. 2008. “Metadiscourse in Linguistics Master’s Theses in English L1 and L2”. Kalbotyra 59 (3): 38-47.
BURNEIKAITĖ, Nida. 2009. “Endophoric Markers in Linguistics Master’s Theses in English L1 and L2”. Žmogus ir žodis 3: 11-16.
CAO, Feng and Guangwei HU. 2014. “Interactive Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Comparative Study of Paradigmatic and Disciplinary Influences”. Journal of Pragmatics 66: 15-31. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007>.
CELIEŠIENĖ, Vilija and Erika SABULYTE. 2018. “Metadiscourse Markers in Technical Texts”. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture 5 (4): 1-14.
CRISMORE, Avon and Rodney FARNSWORTH. 1990. “Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse”. In Walter, Nash (ed.) The Writing Scholar. Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 119-136.
CRISMORE, Avon, Raija MARKKANEN and Margaret S. STEFFENSEN. 1993. “Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students”. Written Communication 10 (1): 39-71. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002>.
CONNOR, Ulla and Ana I. MORENO. 2005. “Tertium Comparationis: A Vital Component in Contrastive Rhetoric Research”. In Bruthiaux, Paul, Dwight Atkinson, William Eggington, William Grabe and Vaidehi Ramanathan (eds.) Directions in Applied Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Robert B. Kaplan. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters: 153-164. < https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598500-015>.
DAHL, Trine. 2004. “Textual Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Marker of National Culture or of Academic Discipline?” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1807-1825. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004>.
DEL SAZ RUBIO, M. Milagros. 2011. “A Pragmatic Approach to the Macro-structure and Metadiscoursal Features of Research Article Introductions in the Field of Agricultural Sciences”. English for Specific Purposes 30 (4): 258-271. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.002 >.
DONTCHEVA-NAVRÁTILOVÁ, Olga. 2023. “Self-mention in L2 (Czech) Learner Academic Discourse: Realisations, Functions and Distribution across Master’s Theses”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 64: 1475-1585. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101272>.
EL-DAKHS, Dina Abdel Salam. 2018. “Why Are Abstracts in PhD Theses and Research Articles Different? A Genre-specific Perspective”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 48-60. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.005>.
FLOWERDEW, Lynne. 2015. “Using Corpus-based Research and Online Academic Corpora to Inform Writing of the Discussion Section of a Thesis”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 58-68. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.001>.
GUZIUROVÁ, Tereza. 2022. “Glossing an Argument: Reformulation and Exemplification in L2 Master’s Theses”. Topics in Linguistics 23 (2): 18-35. <https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2022-0009>.
HYLAND, Ken. 1999. “Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in Introductory Coursebooks”. English for Specific Purposes 18 (1): 3-26. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00025-2>.
HYLAND, Ken. 2004. “Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 133-151. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001 >.
HYLAND, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
HYLAND, Ken. 2008. “Academic Clusters: Text Patterning in Published and Postgraduate Writing”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18: 41-62.
HYLAND, Ken and Feng Kevin JIANG. 2020. “Text-organizing Metadiscourse: Tracking Changes in Rhetorical Persuasion”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21 (1): 137-164. <https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00039.hyl>.
HYLAND, Ken and Polly TSE. 2004. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal”. Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156-177. <https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156>.
JANČAŘÍKOVÁ, Renata. 2023. “Attitude Markers in L2 Learners’ Academic Writing: A Case Study of Master’s Theses by Czech Students Compared to L1 Students’ Writings”. Brno Studies in English 49 (1): 5-31. <https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2023-1-1>.
KAWASE, Tomoyuki. 2015. “Metadiscourse in the Introductions of PhD Theses and Research Articles”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 114-124. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006>.
KHALILI, Assef and Majid ASLANABADI. 2014. “The Use of Metadiscourse Devices by Non-native Speakers in Research Articles”. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 2 (2): 21-34. <https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2017.13648>
KHEDRI, Mohsen, Chan Swee HENG and Seyed Foad EBRAHIMI. 2013. “An Exploration of Interactive Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Research Article Abstracts in Two Disciplines”. Discourse Studies 15 (3): 319-331. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613480588>.
KILGARRIFF, Adam, Pavel RYCHLY, Pavel SMRZ and David TUGWELL. 2004. “ITRI-04-08 the Sketch Engine”. Lexical Computing. Available from <https://www.sketchengine.eu/>.
KIM, Loi Chek and Jason Miin-Hwa LIM. 2013. “Metadiscourse in English and Chinese Research Article Introductions”. Discourse Studies 15 (2): 129-146. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471476>.
KOBAYASHI, Yuichiro. 2017. “Developmental Patterns of Metadiscourse in Second Language Writing”. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 21 (2): 41-54. <https://doi.org/10.25256/PAAL.21.2.3>.
KOUTSANTONI, Dimitra. 2006. “Rhetorical Strategies in Engineering Research Articles and Research Theses: Advanced Academic Literacy and Relations of Power”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 19-36. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002>.
LEE, Joseph J. and J. Elliott CASAL. 2014. “Metadiscourse in Results and Discussion Chapters: A Cross-linguistic Analysis of English and Spanish Thesis Writers in Engineering”. System 46: 39-54. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009>.
LIAO, Jianling. 2020. “Metadiscourse, Cohesion, and Engagement in L2 Written Discourse”. Languages 25 (5): 1-21. <https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5020025>.
MARTÍN-LAGUNA, Sofía and Eva ALCÓN. 2015. “Do Learners Rely on Metadiscourse Markers? An Exploratory Study in English, Catalan and Spanish”. Social and Behavioral Sciences 173: 85-92. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.035>.
MAURANEN, Anna. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
MORENO, Ana I. 2008. “The Importance of Comparable Corpora in Cross-cultural Studies”. In Connor, Ulla, Ed Nagelhout and William V. Rozycki (eds.) Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 25-41.
MU, Congjun, Lawrence Jun ZHANG, John EHRICH and Huaqing HONG. 2015. “The Use of Metadiscourse for Knowledge Construction in Chinese and English Research Articles”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 135-148. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003>.
MUR-DUEÑAS, Pilar. 2011. “An Intercultural Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Research Articles Written in English and in Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3068-3079. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.002>.
PALTRIDGE, Brian. 2002. “Thesis and Dissertation Writing: An Examination of Published Advice and Actual Practice”. English for Specific Purposes 16: 61-70. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00025-9>.
POVOLNÁ, Renata. 2012. “Causal and Contrastive Discourse Markers in Novice Academic Writing”. Brno Studies in English 38 (2): 131-148. <https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2012-2-8>.
PUJOL DAHME, Ana and Moisés SELFA SASTRE. 2015. “The Transition from University to Publication: Register and Interactional Metadiscourse Features in Immunology Research Written in Catalan and English”. Ibérica 30: 155-181.
QIU, Xuyan and Xiaohao MA. 2019. “Disciplinary Enculturation and Authorial Stance: Comparison of Stance Features among Master’s Dissertations, Doctoral Theses, and Research Articles”. Ibérica 38: 327-348.
SWALES, John. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
TRIBBLE, Christopher. 2002. “Corpora and Corpus Analysis: New Windows on Academic Writing”. In Flowerdew, John (ed.) Academic Discourse. London: Longman: 131-149. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838069>.
VOGEL, Radek. 2008. “Sentence Linkers in Essays and Papers by Native vs. Non-native Writers”. Discourse and Interaction 1 (2): 119-126.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lahodová Vališová Marie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Grant numbers 21-12150S
Accepted 2024-04-03
Published 2024-12-16
