The Effect of Prominence Hierarchies on Modern English Long Passives: Pragmatic vs. Syntactic Factors

Autores/as

  • Elena Seoane Universidad de Santiago de Compostela

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20109295

Palabras clave:

voz pasiva, Inglés moderno, orden de palabras, situación discursiva, complejidad sintáctica

Resumen

Este artículo examina el efecto de las jerarquías de prominencia interlingüística más relevantes sobre las pasivas largas (o pasivas con una frase con "by"), con el fin de identificar los factores que condicionan su elección frente a las activas como estrategias de reordenación del orden en el inglés moderno (1500-1900). Con datos empíricos extraídos del Corpus de Helsinki y de ARCHER, se estudiará el efecto de (i) jerarquías de familiaridad, como "given-before-new" o "definite-before-indefinite", (ii) jerarquías de dominancia, como las jerarquías de animacidad, empatía y rol semántico, y (iii) jerarquías formales, como "short-before-long". El análisis revela un claro predominio de los factores pragmáticos y sintácticos, a saber, el estatus del discurso ("given-before-new") y la complejidad estructural ("short-before-long"), que facilitan la planificación, la producción y el análisis sintáctico de los enunciados. A pesar de la aparente correlación entre estos dos factores, este artículo también muestra que son independientes y que, cuando compiten, el estatus discursivo es un factor más importante que la complejidad sintáctica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ALTENBERG, Bengt. 1982. The Genitive vs. the of- Constructions: A Study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.

ARNOLD, Jennifer E., Thomas WASOW, Anthony LOSONGCO and Ryan GINSTROM. 2000. “Heaviness vs. Newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering”. Language 76/1: 28-55.

BIBER, Douglas, Edward FINEGAN and Dwight ATKINSON. 1994. “ARCHER and its Challenges: Compiling and exploring A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers”. In Fries, Udo, Gunnel Tottie and P. Schneider (eds.) Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 1-14.

BIRNER, Betty J. and Gregory WARD. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English (Studies in Language Companion Series, 40). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

BRESNAN, Joan, Shipra DINGARE and Chris MANNING. 2001. “Soft Constraints mirror Hard Constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi”. In Butt, Miriam and Tracy H. King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Draft on-line, Stanford University: http://csli-publications. stanford.edu/.

CHAFE, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

COMRIE, Bernard. (1981), 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.

HAWKINS, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

—. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

KENNEDY, Graeme. 2001. “The distribution of agent making and finiteness as possible contributors to the difficulty of passive voice structures”. In Aijmer, Karen (ed.) A wealth of English Studies in honour of Göran Kjellmer (Gothenberg studies in English, 81). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis: 39-46.

KISS, Katalin É. 1998. “Discourse-Configurationality in the Languages of Europe”. In Siewierska, Anna (ed.) Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 681-727.

KUNO, Susumu and Etsuko KABURAKI. 1977. “Empathy and Syntax”. Linguistic Enquiry, 8: 627-673.

KYTÖ, Merja. (1991), 1993. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English texts. Helsinki: Department of English.

LAMBRECHT, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

NIV, Michael. 1992. “Right Association Revisited”. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Newark, Delaware. June 28-July 02, 1992.

PRINCE, Ellen F. 1992. “The ZPG Letter: Subject, Definiteness and Information-Status”. In Thompson, Sandra A. and William C. Mann (eds.) Discourse Description: Diverse analyses of a fund raising text. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 295-325.

QUIRK, Randolph, Sidney GREENBAUM, Geoffrey LEECH and Jan SVARTVIK. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.

ROSENBACH, Anette. 2002. Genitive Variation in English. Conceptual factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies (Topics in English Linguistics, 42). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

ROSENBACH, Anette. 2005. “Animacy versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English”. Language, 81/3: 613-644.

SEOANE, Elena. 2006. “Information Structure and Word Order: The passive as an information rearranging strategy”. In van Kemenade, Ans and Bettelou Los (eds.) Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell: 360-391.

—. 2009. “Syntactic Complexity, Discourse Status and Animacy as Determinants of Grammatical variation in Modern English”. English Language and Linguistics, 13/3: 365-384.

SEOANE, Elena and Christopher WILLIAMS. 2006. “Changing the Rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse”. In Dossena, Marina and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.) Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-Specific English. Bern: Peter Lang: 255-276.

SIEWIERSKA, Anna 1994. “Word Order and Linearization”. In Asher, R. E. and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9. Oxford: Pergamon: 4993-4999.

SILVERSTEIN, M. 1976. “Hierarchy of Features and Ergativity”. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.) Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies: 112-171.

SÖDERLIND, Johannes. 1951-58. Verb Syntax in John Dryden’s Prose (2 Vols.) Uppsala: Lundquitska Bokhandeln.

SORNICOLA, Rosanna. 2006. “Interaction of Syntactic and Pragmatic factors on Basic Word order in the Languages of Europe”. In Bernini, Giuliano and Marcia L. Schwartz (eds.) Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 357-544.

STRANG, Barbara M. H. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen.

SVARTVIK, Jan. 1996. On Voice in the English Verb. The Hague: Mouton and Co.

WASOW, Thomas. 1997. “Remarks on Grammatical Weight”. Language Variation and Change, 9: 81-105.

—. 2002. Postverbal Behavior. Stanford, Ca: CSLI Publications.

WASOW, Thomas and Jennifer ARNOLD. 2003. “Post-verbal constituent ordering in English”. In Rohdenburg, Günter and Britta Mondorf (eds.) Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 119-154.

Descargas

Publicado

2010-03-01

Cómo citar

Elena Seoane. (2010). The Effect of Prominence Hierarchies on Modern English Long Passives: Pragmatic vs. Syntactic Factors. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 41, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20109295

Número

Sección

Lengua y lingüística