Copernican Revolutions: Mary Jo Salter’s Intertextual Interpretation of Paradise Lost in Falling Bodies

Authors

  • Mariacristina Natalia Bertoli University of Fribourg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20099658

Keywords:

Salter, Milton, Intertextuality, Tragische Analysis, Dread

Abstract

Intertextuality has often been viewed as the mere rewriting of the plot of a work of literature, thus downplaying the role of structures in creating nets of meaning which cross the boundaries of a single text. By contrast, the present study deals with the meanings attached to traditional structures such as the beginning in medias res (or tragische Analysis). In particular, this article presents the way the manipulation
of this device inherited from ancient epics allowed Milton to reverse its original moral implications in Paradise Lost, thus bringing about what John M. Steadman has defined a “Copernican Revolution” in literature. In addition, this study analyzes the reuse of the Miltonic model in Falling Bodies, a play written by the contemporary American poet Mary Jo Salter. Here tragische Analysis is used for bringing about a new Copernican Revolution in which the focus has been shifted from morals to metaliterature. In effect, this structure enables Salter to investigate the very mechanisms of intertextuality and to show that literary recreation never turns upside down the system it belongs to; rather, it enriches the tradition it has stemmed from in a ceaseless process of rewriting and manipulation. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BACIGALUPO, Massimo. 2004-2005. “A Note on Mary Jo Salter’s America”. Rivista di Studi Nordamericani 15–16: 145–149.

BARKER, Arthur A. 1965. “Structural Pattern in Paradise Lost”. Milton: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. A.A. Barker. London, Oxford, New York: Oxford U.P.

BENTHALL, R.A. 2003. “Mary Jo Salter”. New Formalist Poets. Ed. and introd. J.N. Barron and B. Meyer. Detroit, MI: Thomson Gale: 265–271.

BERTOLI, Mariacristina Natalia. 2008. “Gliscacchi di Freud. Per un’anatomia della critica letteraria psicoanalitica”. Testo 56 (7): 30.

BRADLEY, Andrew Cecil. (1904) 1966. Shakespearean Tragedy. New York: Macmillan.

COLIE, Rosalie L. 1960. “Time and Eternity: Paradox and Structure in Paradise Lost”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 23 (1/2): 127–138.

ELIOT, Thomas S. (1919) 1971. “Tradition and Individual Talent”. Selected Essays, London: Faber and Faber.

FORSYTH, Neil. 1981. “Homer in Milton: The Attendance Motif and the Graces”. Comparative Literature 33 (2): 137–155.

FREUD, Sigmund. 1985. The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904. Transl. J.M. Masson. Cambridge, MASS: The Belknap Press.

—. 2003. An Outline of Psychoanalysis. Transl. H. Ragg-Kirkby. London: Penguin.

GOETHE von, Johann Wolfgang. 1949. Gedenkausgabe der Werke, Briefe und Gespräche. Zurich: Artemis Verlag.

HORACE. (c. 18 BC) 1947. Ars Poetica. Ed. A.S. Wilkins. London: Macmillan.

KATES, Judith A. 1974. “The Revaluation of the Classical Heroic in Tasso and Milton”. Comparative Literature 26 (4): 299–317.

KIERKEGAARD, Søren. 1944. The concept of Dread. Transl. W. Lowrie. Princeton: Princeton U.P.

KING-KOK, Cheung. 1984. “Shakespeare and Kierkegaard: ‘Dread’ in Macbeth”. Shakespeare Quarterly 34 (4): 430–439.

KRISTEVA, Julia. 1969. Séméiôtiké: recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

LAVAGETTO, Mario. 2003. Lavorare con piccoli indizi. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

MARTINDALE, Charles. 1985. “Paradise Metamorphosed: Ovid in Milton”. Comparative Literature 37 (4): 301–333.

MATTE BLANCO, Ignacio. 1998. The Unconscious as Infinite Sets: An Essay in Bi-logic. London: Karnac Books.

MILTON, John. Paradise Lost. (1667) 1975. Ed. S. Elledge. New York-London: W.W. Norton & Company.

PADUANO, Guido. 1994. Lunga Storia di Edipo Re. Freud, Sofocle e il teatro occidentale. Torino: Einaudi.

POST, Jonathan. 2008. “Ekphrasis and the Fabric of the Familiar in Mary Jo Salter’s Poetry”. In The Frame: Women’s Ekphrastic Poetry from Marianne Moore to Susan Wheeler. Ed. J. Hedley, N. Halpern, W. Spiegelman. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.

SALTER, Mary Jo. 2004. Falling Bodies. Unpublished manuscript.

SOBEL, Dava. 1999. Galileo’s Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith and Love. New York: Walker & Co.

SPITZER, Leo. 1948. Linguistics and Literary History: Essays in Stylistics. Princeton: Princeton U.P.

STEADMAN, John M. 1967. Milton and the Renaissance Hero. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

TANNER, John S. 1988. “‘Say First What Cause:’ Ricoeur and the Etiology of Evil in Paradise Lost”. PMLA 103 (1): 45–56.

TAYLOR, Henry. 2002. “Faith and Practice: The Poems of Mary Jo Salter”. Twayne Companion to Contemporary Literature in English. Ed. R.

H. W. Dillard and A. Cockrell. New York: Twayne Thomson Gale, vol. II: 297-310.

WALLACE, William A. 1974. “Galileo and Reasoning Ex Suppositione: The Methodology of the Two New Sciences”. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association: 79–104.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-31

How to Cite

Bertoli, M. N. (2009). Copernican Revolutions: Mary Jo Salter’s Intertextual Interpretation of Paradise Lost in Falling Bodies. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 40, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20099658