Valencies of "Deautomatization" in the Literary Theory of Russian Formalism

Authors

  • Cristian Cámara Outes Universidad Carolina de Praga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.2020344345

Keywords:

Russian Formalism, Deautomatization, Literary theory, Viktor Shklovsky, Yuri Tynyanov, Boris Eichenbaum

Abstract

To this day, it is possible to say that the general disrepute into which structuralist poetics has fallen has not resulted in a sufficient revision of the distorted image of the main theses of Russian formalism, arranged by the structuralist authors in accordance with precise interests of genealogical self-description. Against the exaggerated heteronomism of contemporary literary studies, as a partially extravagant consequence of deconstructive premises (although historically not so unusual), the analytical breakdown of the fundamental valencies of the term «deautomatization» may allow us to account for the extent to which Russian formalism developed a complete and sophisticated system of study of literary phenomena, which at all levels of analysis emphasizes the features of antinomy, transgression and dynamization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-07-17

How to Cite

Cámara Outes, C. (2020). Valencies of "Deautomatization" in the Literary Theory of Russian Formalism. Tropelías: Review of Literary Theory and Comparative Literature, (34), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.2020344345

Issue

Section

Papers
Received 2020-04-08
Accepted 2020-05-15
Published 2020-07-17