Feminist literary theory and the woman reader

Authors

  • Diana Holmes University of Leeds

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.2021365319

Keywords:

reader, feminism, popular novel, middlebrow, patriarchy, praxis, immersion, reception, resistance

Abstract

The effects of reading on the reader have been remarkably little studied in literary criticism and theory. When, notably in the 1970s and 80s, reader-response theory brought the reader’s role in the construction of a text’s meaning to critical attention, that reader was largely deduced from the text itself and thus neither socially situated - in terms of class, ethnicity, degree of cultural capital - nor gendered. However feminist criticism, beginning in the 1970s though with significant antecedents, began from the premise that reading as well as writing mattered: that patriarchal culture was sustained and transmitted in part through its literature, which must be subjected to sceptical readings by women alert to the workings of masculinist ideology, while at the same time women’s own writing should be rescued from critical deprecation and its contemporary practice promoted. The woman reader became one central focus of feminist literary study, with a particular emphasis on the genre that women have most extensively practised and read from the nineteenth century on, namely the novel. This article traces the history of feminist theorising of the effects on the reader of reading narrative fiction, with reference mainly to anglophone and francophone feminist criticism, arguably the most influential in a large and multi-lingual body of work. It illuminates the ways in which feminist literary theory has made the reader a significant agent in the way that a text produces meaning, and has replaced the abstract, singular reader of reader-response theory with a plurality of readers whose relationship to the text differs according to their sex (and, by implication, other elements of identity including ethnicity and class).  By focusing on an interweaving chain of feminist writings, from Virginia Woolf and Simone de Beauvoir to contemporary work on the popular and middlebrow novel, this article shows how feminist critics have radically re-thought what it means to read a novel as a woman, and affirmed the political significance of reading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beauvoir, Simone de. Le Deuxième Sexe, I Les Faits et les mythes. Gallimard Folio, 1976.

Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa”. Signs, vol. 1, no. 4,1976, pp. 875-893.

Chodorow, Nancy. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. University of California Press, 1978.

Centre National du Livre. Les Français et la lecture. https://centrenationaldulivre.fr/donnees-cles/les-francais-et-la-lecture-en-2019 /

Constans, Ellen (ed.). Le Roman sentimental : actes du colloque du colloque des 14-16 mars 1989, vols. i and ii. Trames, 1990.

- Parlez-moi d’amour : le roman sentimental. Des romans grec aux collections de l’an 2000. PULIM, 1999.

Culler, Jonathan. “Reading as a Woman.” Feminisms: an Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism, edited by Robyn R. Warhol and Diane Price Herndl, Rutgers UP, 1991, pp. 509-24.

Driscoll, Beth. The New Literary Middlebrow: tastemakers and reading in the twenty-first century. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014

Beth Driscoll and DeNel Rehberg Sedo. “Faraway, So Close: Seeing the Intimacy in Goodreads Reviews”. Qualitative Inquiry, vol.25(3), 2019, 248-59.

Ellmann, Mary. Thinking About Women. Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968.

Fetterley, Judith. The Resisting Reader. Indiana UP, 1970.

Freund, Elizabeth. The Return of the Reader: Reader-response Criticism. Methuen, 1987.

Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Harvard University Press, 1982.

Holmes, Diana. Romance and Readership in Twentieth-Century France: Love Stories. Oxford University Press, 2006.

- Middlebrow Matters: Women's reading and the literary canon in France since the Belle Époque. Liverpool University Press, 2018.

Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: a theory of aesthetic response, 1978.

Keen, Suzanne. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford University Press, 2007.

Millett, Kate. Sexual Politics. Doubleday, 1970.

Modleski, Tania. Loving with a Vengeance. Shoestring Press, 1982.

- “Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a ‘Postfeminist’ Age,” Feminisms: an Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism, edited by Robyn R. Warhol and Diane Price Herndl, Rutgers UP, 1991, pp. 342-346.

Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, Screen, vol. 16, Issue 3, 1975, pp. 6–18.

Pearce, Lynne. Feminism and the Politics of Reading, 1997.

Radway, Janice. Reading the Romance. Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature, 1984. Revised edition. University of North Carolina Press, 1991.

- A Feeling for Books: The Book-of-the-Month Club, Literary Taste, and Middle-Class Desire. University of North Carolina Press, 1997.

Ryan, Marie-Laure. Narrative as Virtual Reality The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.

Schweickart, Patrocinio P. “Reading Ourselves: Toward a Feminist Theory of Reading.” Feminisms: an Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism, edited by Robyn R. Warhol and Diane Price Herndl, Rutgers UP, 1991, pp. 525-50.

Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Bronte to Lessing. Princeton UP, 1977.

Snitow, Ann. “Mass Market Romance: Pornography for Women is Different.” Women and Romance – A Reader, edited by Susan Ostrov Weisser, New York UP, 2001, pp.307-322.

Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own, London Hogarth Press 1929, https://www.globalgreyebooks.com/room-of-ones-own-ebook.html

YouGov. “What are the Reading Habits of Britons?”, 2020. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/arts/articles-reports/2020/03/05/world-book-day-britons-reading-habits.

Published

2021-08-13

How to Cite

Holmes, D. (2021). Feminist literary theory and the woman reader. Tropelías: Review of Literary Theory and Comparative Literature, (36), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.2021365319

Issue

Section

Dossier
Received 2021-04-15
Accepted 2021-07-07
Published 2021-08-13