Technology Acceptance Scale in Social Workers
Benefits of Teleworking.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ais/accioninvestigsoc.2022437423Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model; social work; telework technologies; teleworking in Social Services.Abstract
In recent years, there has been significant technological progress, particularly in the world of information and communication technologies (ICTs), which are rapidly transforming the various professions linked to social intervention. The hypothesis that social workers manifest a high level of technology acceptance since they discern significant advantages in using teleworking technologies in their professional practice is used as a starting point for our research. Hence, our main aim was to check the degree of technology acceptance among social workers on an international level, with a secondary goal being to analyse how the link is established between professional practice and the use of new technological opportunities for social workers. With respect to method, a specialised questionnaire with 27 variables (Cronbach’s alpha α = 0.950) and the scale for the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) were applied to a sample of 1144 social workers from 13 countries. In conclusion, a high degree of technology acceptance was detected, along with a clear identification between professional practice, the use of technological advances and their connection with the standards proposed by NASW, and a clear identification of the main benefits of using such technologies for social work. All these elements have a close relationship with the extension of teleworking in Social Services and with e-social work.
Downloads
References
Abad, M. (2011). Aceptación de las TIC en el ámbito educativo: Google vs Moodle. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
Amado, A. y Gala, R. (2019). Brecha digital, inclusión y apropiación de tecnologías. Un breve recorrido por sus diferentes conceptualizaciones. En S. Lago Martínez (coord.): Políticas públicas e inclusión digital. Un recorrido por los Núcleos de Acceso al Conocimiento. Buenos Aires, TeseoPress. https://www.teseopress.com/politicaspublicaseinclusiondigital/.
Barrera, E. y Sarasola, J.L. (2020). Teletrabajo Social e Investigación. En Barrera, E. y Sarasola, J.L. (Coords.) Investigaciones desde el Trabajo Social. Navarra: Aranzadi. 45-65.
Beier, M., & Früh, S. (2020). Technological, organizational, and environmental factors influencing social media adoption by hospitals in switzerland: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3), e16995. doi:10.2196/16995
Bell, I. Bell, M. (2019). Google suite para la educación cooperativa. En T.M. Vallet y M.T. Martínez (Coords.) II jornadas de innovación educativa DIMEU . Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I. 67-84. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=736483&orden=0&info=open_link_libro
Belluomini, E. (29 de 03 de 2021). Technology Changing the Face of Social Work. Obtenido de The New Social Worker: http://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/technology-articles/Technology_Changing_the_Face_of_Social_Work/
Bryant, L., Garnham, B., Tedmanson, D., & Diamandi, S. (2015). Tele-social work and mental health in rural and remote communities in Australia. International Social Work , 1-13.
Cabero, J., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2017). Las Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación para la inclusión: reformulando la brecha digital. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (9), 16–30. https://www.upo.es/revistas/index.php/IJERI/article/view/2665
Castells, M., Barrera, A., & Casal, P. (1986). El desafío tecnológico. España y las nuevas tecnologías. Madrid: Alianza.
Castillo, J. (2017). El trabajo social ante el reto de la transformación digital. Big Data y redes sociales para la investigación y la intervención social. Navarra: Aranzadi Thompson Reuters
Christenson, B. (28 de 03 de 2019). Capella University. Obtenido de The Growing Use of Technology in Social Work: http://www.capella.edu/blogs/cublog/growing-use-of-technology-in-social-work/
Colom, C. (2020). Las brechas digitales que deben preocuparnos y ocuparnos. Ekonomiaz: Revista vasca de economía, 98, 350-353. https://www.euskadi.eus/web01-a2reveko/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/downloadPDF?R01HNoPortal=true&idpubl=95®istro=20
Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., De Moya-Martínez, M.V., Hernández-Bravo, J.A. , & Hernández-Bravo, J.R. (2016). Conocimiento y Uso de las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (TIC) según el Estilo de Aprendizaje de los Futuros Maestros. Formación universitaria, 9(6), 105-118. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062016000600010
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319-340, doi:10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P. y Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 982-1003, doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Davis, J., Wolff, H. -., Forret, M. L., & Sullivan, S. E. (2020). Networking via LinkedIn: An examination of usage and career benefits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103396
Demailly, Z., Brulard, G., Selim, J., Compère, V., Besnier, E., & Clavier, T. (2020). Gender differences in professional social media use among anaesthesia researchers. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 124(3), e178-e184. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.030
Elhakim, M., Dexter, F., & Fahy, B. G. (2020). Changes in current employment positions after taking an operating room management course content by physicians and non-physicians and potential use of the content. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management, 20. doi:10.1016/j.pcorm.2020.100097
Fernández, B. (2017). Aplicación del modelo de aceptación tecnológica (TAM) al uso de la realidad aumentada en estudios universitarios. Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba. https://helvia.uco.es/xmlui/handle/10396/14886
García, N., Rivero, M. L., & Ricis, J. (2020). Brecha digital en tiempo del COVID-19. Revista Educativa HEKADEMOS, (28), 76-85. https://www.hekademos.com/index.php/hekademos/article/view/9
Hartman, R. L., & Barber, E. G. (2020). Women in the workforce: The effect of gender on occupational self-efficacy, work engagement and career aspirations. Gender in Management, 35(1), 92-118. doi:10.1108/GM-04-2019-0062
J.J. Pereyra-Rodríguez, A. I. Jiménez y F. Saigí (2018). Determinantes de la intención de uso de la telemedicina en una organización sanitaria. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research, 33 (6), 319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.08.004
Lucero-Romero, G., & Arias-Bolzmann, L. G. (2020). Millennials' use of online social networks for job search: The ecuadorian case. Psychology and Marketing, 37(3), 359-368. doi:10.1002/mar.21292
López, A. & Chaime Marcuello-Servós, C. (2018). e-Social work and digital society: re-conceptualizing approaches, practices and technologies. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 801-803, doi: 10.1080/13691457.2018.1520475
McCarty, D., & Clancy, c. (2002). Telehealth: Implications for Social Work Practice. Social Work, 47(2), 153-161.
NASW, & BASW. (2017). NASW & A S W B S t a n d a r d s f o r Technology a n d S o c i a l W o r k P r a c t i c e. Washington: National Association of Social Workers and Association of Social Work Boards.
NASW. (29 de 03 de 2021). Social Workers and e-Therapy. Obtenido de National Association of Social Workers: http://www.socialworkers.org/ldf/legal_issue/2007/200704.asp?print=1&
Olarte, S. (2017). Brecha digital, pobreza y exclusión social. Temas laborales Revista andaluza de trabajo y bienestar social, (138), 285-313. https://bit.ly/3LaSP40
Quicaño, C., León, C., y Moquillaza, A. (2019). Un modelo para medir el comportamiento en la aceptación tecnológica del servicio de Internet en hoteles peruanos basado en utaut2. Caso "casa andina". 3 c TIC: cuadernos de desarrollo aplicados a las TIC, 8 (1), 12-35. DOI: doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2019.81.12-35
Rasmussen, B. (2015). Sue Watling and Jim Rogers: Social Work in a Digital Society. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(2), 254–255.
Reamer, F. (08 de 01 de 2021a). Digital Technology in Social Work. Obtenido de Encyclopedia of Social Work: http://socialwork.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/acrefore-9780199975839-e-1160.
Reamer, F. (2015b). Clinical Social Work in a Digital Environment: Ethical and Risk-Management Challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(2), 120-132.
Sandi Delgado, J. (2019). Juegos serios para la indagación de competencias tecnológicas que puedan integrarse en la práctica pedagógica del profesorado. Una propuesta de aplicación en la Sede del Atlántico de la Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR). Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnología En Educación Y Educación En Tecnología, (23), e13. doi.org/10.24215/18509959.23.e13
Tejedor, F., & Valcárcel, A. (1996). Perspectivas de las Nuevas Tecnologías en Educación. Madrid: Narcea.
Watling, S., & Rogers, J. (2012). Social Work in a Digital Society. London:SAGE Publications
West, D., & Heath, D. (2011). Theoretical Pathways to the Future: Globalization, ICT and Social Work Theory and Practice. Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 209–21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Evaristo Barrera-Algarín, José Luís Sarasola-Sánchez-Serrano, Alberto Sarasola-Fernández, Ana Vallejo-Andrada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their papers electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published papers (see The Effect of Open Access).
