Relationship between the inductive or deductive approach to case-based learning on academic performance, self-efficacy, and satisfaction of social work students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ais/accionesinvestigsoc.2023448992Keywords:
academic performance, satisfaction, self-efficacy, Activity learningAbstract
Introduction: Case-Based Learning (CBL) teaching methodology is an active learning methodology that generates a higher level of student participation and significant learning. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare a CBL activity using deductive reasoning (analyse and extract theoretical concepts in a case provided for this purpose) and a CBL activity using inductive reasoning (create a case by implicitly introducing theoretical concepts) in terms of academic performance and student satisfaction, as well as to analyse the relationship of the latter with the perception of self-efficacy.
Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was developed. 111 students performed both CBL activities (deductive and inductive). Each learning activity dealt with theoretical contents of group psychology. The variables collected were: activity grade, satisfaction with each activity, theoretical exam grade and perception of self-efficacy. A descriptive, correlational, and comparative analysis was conducted using T-Student of related samples.
Results: The grades for the inductive CBL activity were significantly higher than those for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.042). The students´ level of satisfaction in the item “helps to think critically” was evaluated more favourably for the deductive CBL activity (p=0.029). The relationship between the grade of the inductive CBL activity and that obtained in the theoretical exam was significant. There was no correlation between any of the activities and the perceived self-efficacy of the students.
Conclusions: The CBL activity with inductive reasoning is more effective to achieve academic performance and the satisfaction with the activities evaluated by the students is high.
Downloads
References
Baessler, J., y Schwarzer, R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia: adaptación española de la Escala de Autoeficacia general [Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Spanish adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 2(1), 1–8.,
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (First, p. 71). Academic Press.
Banning, K. C. (2003). The Effect of the Case Method on Tolerance for Ambiguity. Journal of Management Education, 27(5), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252652
Bergmann, Jonathan., y Sams, Aaron. (2012). Flip your classroom : reach every student in every class every day (International Society for Technology in Education, Ed.).
Berrocal Berrocal, F., y Pereda Marín, S. (2001). Formación y gestión del conocimiento. Revista Complutense de Educación, 12(2), 639–656.
Bi, M., Zhao, Z., Yang, J., y Wang, Y. (2019). Comparison of case-based learning and traditional method in teaching postgraduate students of medical oncology. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1124–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1617414
Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance (First). Wiley.
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., y Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20048
Escartín, J., Saldaña, O., Martín-Peña, J., Varela-Rey, A., Jiménez, Y., Vidal, T., y Rodríguez-Carballeira, Á. (2015). The Impact of Writing Case Studies: Benefits for Students’ Success and Well-being. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.009
Fernández García, T., y Ponce de León Romero, L. (2011). El proceso de intervención en el trabajo social con casos: una enseñanza teórica-práctica para las escuelas de trabajo social. Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales, 1 Ext, 371.
Gómez-Poyato, M. J., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Martínez-Pecharromán, M. M., Magallón-Botaya, R., y Oliván-Blázquez, B. (2020). Flipped classroom and role-playing as active learning methods in the social work degree: randomized experimental study. Social Work Education, 39(7), 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1693532
Graeff, T. R. (2010). Strategic Teaching for Active Learning. Marketing Education Review, 20(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008200307
IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. https://www.ibm.com/
Jahnke, I., y Liebscher, J. (2020). Three types of integrated course designs for using mobile technologies to support creativity in higher education. Computers & Education, 146, 103782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103782
Keshmiri, F., Jafari, M., Dehghan, M., Raee-Ezzabadi, A., y Ghelmani, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of interprofessional education on interprofessional collaborative practice and self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1763827
Kirkpatrick, D. L., y Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. In Journal of the American Society of Training Directors (Third). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Kober, N. (2015). Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering (National Research Council, Ed.; First). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18687
Kolmos, A. (2004). Strategies to develop curricula based on problem formulation and organized in projects. Educar, 33, 77. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.262
Leonard, E. C., y Cook, R. A. (2010). Teaching with Cases. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 10(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220903559296
Lubin Pigouche, P., Maciá Antón, M. A., y Rubio de Lemus, P. (2005). Psicología matemática (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Ed.; Third). Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
Maqableh, M., Jaradat, M., y Azzam, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of students’ academic performance at university level: The mediating role of internet usage continuance intention. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4003–4025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10453-y
McLean, S. F. (2016). Case-Based Learning and its Application in Medical and Health-Care Fields: A Review of Worldwide Literature. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 3, JMECD.S20377. https://doi.org/10.4137/JMECD.S20377
NCSS Statistical Software. (2016). PASS Power Analysis Software and Sample Size Software . https://www.ncss.com/software/pass/
Newson, T. A., y Delatte, N. J. (2011). Case Methods in Civil Engineering Teaching. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 38(9), 1016–1030.
Oliván Blázquez, B., Masluk, B., Gascon, S., Fueyo Díaz, R., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Artola Magallón, I., y Magallón Botaya, R. (2019). The use of flipped classroom as an active learning approach improves academic performance in social work: A randomized trial in a university. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0214623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214623
Oliván-Blázquez, B., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Gascón-Santos, S., Gómez-Poyato, M. J., Valero-Errazu, D., Magallón-Botaya, R., Heah, R., y Porroche-Escudero, A. (2022a). Comparing the use of flipped classroom in combination with problem-based learning or with case-based learning for improving academic performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 146978742210815. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221081550
Olivan-Blázquez, B., Asensio-Martínez, Á., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Samper-Pardo, M., León-Herrera, S., y Méndez-López de-la-Manzanara, F. (2022b). From the analysis of a case study to the creation of storytelling as an active learning methodology and its comparison in relation to academic performance and satisfaction. 2936–2940. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.0743
Peng, W.-S., Wang, L., Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., Wu, Y.-M., Sang, X., Zhou, R., Xu, J.-L., y Chen, X. (2021). Application of virtual scenario simulation combined with problem-based learning for paediatric medical students. Journal of International Medical Research, 49(2), 030006052097921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520979210
Piqué Simón, B., y Forés Miravalles, A. (2012). Propuestas metodológicas para la educación superior. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/30702
Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method. Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002
Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Sánchez-Iglesias, I., Grande-de-Prado, M., Oliván-Blázquez, B., Martín-Peña, J., y Cancer-Lizaga, P. (2017). Spanish version of “Self-Efficacy for Writing Scale” (SEWS). Anales de Psicología, 34(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.1.264931
Sanjuán Suárez, P., Pérez García, A. M., y Bermúdez Moreno, J. (2000). Escala de autoeficacia general: datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española. Psicothema, 12(Supl 2), 509–513.
Sellberg, C., y Wiig, A. C. (2020). Telling Stories from the Sea: Facilitating Professional Learning in Maritime Post-Simulation Debriefings. Vocations and Learning, 13(3), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-020-09250-4
The Foundation for Young Australians. (2017). THE NEW WORK MINDSET: 7 new job clusters to help young people navigate the new work order. https://www.fya.org.au/app/uploads/2021/09/The-New-Work-Mindset_2016.pdf
Zhu, X., Xiong, Z., Zheng, T., Li, L., Zhang, L., y Yang, F. (2021). Case‐based learning combined with science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education concept to improve clinical thinking of undergraduate nursing students: A randomized experiment. Nursing Open, 8(1), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.642
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fátima Méndez-López, Loreto Camarero-Grados, Anna Moleras-Serra, Rachel Heah, Ana Porroche-Escudero, Rafael Sánchez-Arizcuren
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their papers electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and higher citation of published papers (see The Effect of Open Access).
Funding data
-
Universidad de Zaragoza
Grant numbers PIIDUZ 22_1_572
Accepted 2023-06-15
Published 2023-11-14