The Functional Motivations of Complement That-Clauses

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Acuña Fariña Universidad de Santiago de Compostela

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199811010

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to reveal a few basic principles which constitute the essential logic of the English system of complementation. That-clauses will be the main focus of attention, although frequent reference will be made to the non-finite forms of complementation, especially to complementation by infinitives. I will draw on well-established research by Bresnan (1972), Riddle (1975), Rudanko (1984), Noonan (1985), Beukema and Verspoor (1990), and Givón (1993), in an attempt to integrate them all into a coherent whole. Such an integration will show up “the profoundly non-arbitrary nature of the coding relation between grammar and meaning” (Givón 1993: 2.24), or; in other words, the functional or even logical motivations of the form of clausal complements in English.

Display downloads

References

BEUKEMA, F. and M. VERSPOOR. 1991. “Semantic Triggering of Sentential Complement Selection: the Case of to/-ing Nonfinite Clauses.” In Language Usage and Description. Studies Presented to N.E. Osselton. Ed. I. Tieken and J. Francis Boon van Ostade. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 149-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653276_017

BRESNAN J. 1970. “On Complementizers: Toward a Syntactic Theory of Complement Types.” Foundations of Language 6: 297-321.

--. 1972. “Theory of Complementation in English Syntax.” Ph.D. dissertation: MIT.

GIVÓN, T. 1993. English Grammar. A Function-Based Introduction. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.engram2

HUDDLESTON, R. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165785

JESPERSEN, O. 1965. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Vol. 5. London: Oxford UP.

MENZEL, p. 1975. Semantics and Syntax in Complementation. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820560

NOONAN, M. 1985. “Complementation.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II. Ed. T. Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

QUIRK, R. et al. 1985. A Comprenensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

RANSOM, E. 1986. Complementation: Its Meanings and Forms. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.10

RIDDLE, E. 1975. “Some Pragmatic Conditions on Complementizer Choice.” In Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Ed. R. Grossman, L. San and T. Vance. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 467-74.

RUDANKO, J. 1984. “On Some Contrasts between Infinitival and That-Complement Clauses in English.” English Studies 65: 141-61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138388408598313

--. 1989. Complementation and Case Grammar. Albany (NY): SUNY Press.

VERSPOOR, M. 1990. “Semantic Criteria in English Complement Selection.” PhD. Dissertation, Universty of Leiden.

WEKKER, H. 1985. “Points of Modern English Syntax LXVIIL” English Studies 67/6: 561-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138388608598484

Downloads

Published

1998-12-31

Issue

Section

ARTICLES: Language and linguistics

How to Cite

Juan Carlos Acuña Fariña. (1998). The Functional Motivations of Complement That-Clauses. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 19, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199811010