Relative Connectives in Present-Day English: A Corpus-Based Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199711283Abstract
The main objective of this study is to analyse the most important aspects which determine the selection of relative connectives in present-day English. The data have been extracted from the 180 relative clauses contained in three files of the Lancaster Parsed Corpus, which is a subset of the LancasterOslo/Bergen Corpus. The first of these files has material extracted from the press, the second one corresponds to scientific English and the third one contains clauses extracted from narrative texts. The three files total 27004 words. Grillllmatical factors, such as the function of the relative pronoun or the type of the noun phrase antecedent, have been found to influence the choice of the relative linkword. Some cognitive strategies which are aimed at making the production and understanding of relative clauses easier also condition the selection of the connective. Finally, the stylistic characteristics of the three genres analysed have also been proved to have an effect over the disuibution of the relative pronouns.
Downloads
References
BOLINGER, D. 1972. That's That. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872385
COFER, T. M. 1975. "Performance Constraints on Relative Pronoun Deletion."Linguistics 157: 13-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1975.13.157.13
GARSIDE, R. G. N. LEECH and T. VARASI. Manual of Information for the Lancaster Parsed Corpus. Lancaster: U of Lancaster, n.d.
HAAN, P. I. M. de. 1991. "On the Exploration of Corpus Data by Means of Problem-Oriented Tagging: Postmodifying Clauses in the English Noun Phrase." In Johanson and Stenström 1991: 51-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110865967.51
JOHANSSON, S., G. N. LEECH and H. GOODLUCk, comp. 1978. Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English. Oslo: U of Oslo.
JOHANSSON, S and A. B. STENSTROM, eds. 1991. English Computer Corpora. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
KEBNAN, E. L. and B. COMKIE. 1977. "Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar." Linguistic Inquiry 8.1: 63-99.
KuNo, S. 1974. "The Position of Relative Clauses and Conjunctions." Linguistic Inquiry 5: 117-136.
PRIDEAUX, G. D. and W. J. BAKER. 1986. Strategies and Structures: The Processing of Relative Clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.46
QUIRK, R. 1957. "Relative Clauses in Educated Spoken English." English Studies 38: 97-109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138385708596993
QUIRK, R. et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
SCHMIED, J. 1993. "Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches to English Relative Constructions." In Souter and Atwell 1993: 85-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653542_010
SOUTER, C. and E. ATWELL, eds. 1993. Corpus-Based Computational Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653542
TAGLICHT, J. 1973. "The Choice of Relative Pronouns in Written English." Scripta Hierosolymitana 25: 327-336.
YAMASHITA, J. 1994. An Analysis of Relative Clauses in the Lancaster/IBM Spoken English Corpus.* English Studies 75.1: 73-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138389408598898
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.