Native American Humor as Resistance: Breaking Identity Moulds in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water

Authors

  • Aitor Ibarrola-Armendariz Universidad de Deusto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20109416

Keywords:

Native Americans, Thomas King, Narratives of resistance, Humor, Identity

Abstract

Although in appearance a hilarious literary work about border crossing and cultural interaction, Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water also proves to be an effective narrative of resistance in which a severe critique of the socio-surgical incisions that the Western colonial paradigm has inflicted on the indigenous peoples is articulated. By means of a Native brand of humor, which combines techniques such as subversive intertextual references, plays on words, anachronistic elements, the inclusion of trickster figures or the satiric treatment of stereotypes, King manages to undo the white man’s performance of epistemological and spiritual domination. This article shows how the comic sign that Vizenor, Allen, Arteaga, and others have studied in the oral storytelling and the literature of the oppressed can in fact be turned into a successful weapon to disarm the oppressor in unequal power relations. A close reading of King’s text reveals that humor can be productively used to challenge and subvert the colonial modes of representation and identity moulds that have imprisoned Native Americans for centuries. Thus, the author could be cogently described, following Vizenor, as a “postindian warrior”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACHEBE, Chinua. (1959) 1994. Things Fall Apart. New York: Anchor Books.

ALLEN, Paula G. 1992. The Sacred Hoop: Recovering the Feminine in American Indian Traditions. Boston: Beacon Press.

ANDREWS, Jennifer. 2002. “Reading Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water: Border-Crossing Humor”. English Studies in Canada 28 (1): 91-116.

ARTEAGA, Alfred. 1999. “Poetics of Resistance”. In Manzanas, Ana and Jesús Benito. (eds.) Narratives of Resistance: Literature and Ethnicity in the United States and the Caribbean. Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha: 333-337.

ATWOOD, Margaret. 1990. “A Double-Bladed Knife: Subversive Laughter in Two Stories by Thomas King”. Canadian Literature 124/125: 243-250.

BAILEY, Sharon M. 1999. “The Arbitrary Nature of the Story: Poking Fun at Oral and Written Authority in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. World Literature Today: A Literary Quarterly of the Univeristy of Oklahoma 73 (1): 43-52.

BAKHTIN, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

BENITO, Jesús. 1999. “The Poetics and the Politics of Resistance”. In Manzanas, Ana and Jesús Benito. (eds.) Narratives of Resistance: Literature and Ethnicity in the United States and the Caribbean. Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha: 315-331.

BHABHA, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

BROWN, Dee. 1970. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. New York: Holt.

DAXELL, Joanna. 2003. “A Space for Healing the Native Spirit: Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. Etudes Canadiennes/Canadian Studies 55: 99-111.

DELORIA, Vine. 1969. Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto. New York: MacMillan.

DERRY, Ken. 2002. “Religion and (Mimetic) Violence in Canadian Native Literature”. Literature and Theology 16 (2): 201-219.

DONALDSON, Laura E. 1995. “Noah Meets Old Coyote, or Singing in the Rain: Intertextuality in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. Studies in American Indian Literature 7 (2): 27-43.

DUBOIS, W.E.B. 1903. The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co.

FANON, Frantz. 1968 (1961). The Wretched of the Earth. Trans. Constance Parrington. New York: Grove.

FEE, Margery and Jane FLICK. 1999. “Coyote Pedagogy: Knowing Where the Borders Are in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. Canadian Literature 161/162: 131-139.

GATES, Henry Louis, Jr. 1984. “Introduction: Criticism in the Jungle”. In H.L. Gates (ed). Black Literature and Literary Theory. New York: Methuen: 1-24.

GOLDMAN, Marlene. 1999. “Mapping and Dreaming: Native Resistance in Green Grass, Running Water”. Canadian Literature 161/162: 18-41.

GÓMEZ-PEÑA, Ibis. 2001. “Subverting the ‘Mainstream’ Paradigm through Magical Realism in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association 33 (1): 1-19.

GZOWSKI, Peter. 1999. “Peter Gzowski Interviews Thomas King on Green Grass, Running Water”. Canadian Literature 161/162: 65-76.

HIRSCH, Bud. 2004. “Stay Calm, Be Brave, Wait for the Signs: Sign-offs and Sign-ups in the Fiction of Thomas King”. Western American Literature 39 (2): 145-175.

HYDE, Lewis. 1998. “Introduction”. In Hydes, Lewis. (ed.) Trickster Makes this World: Mischief, Myth, and Art. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux: 3-15.

HYNES, William J. 1993. “Mapping the Characteristics of Mythic Tricksters: A Heuristic Guide”. In Hynes, W.J. and W.G. Doty. (eds.) Mythical Trickster Figures: Contours, Contexts, and Criticism. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press: 33-45.

KING, Thomas. 1993. Green Grass, Running Water. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.

KRISTEVA, Julia. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Roudiez, Leon S. New York: Columbia U.P.

LENOIR, Michael. 1998. “Image Distortion Disorder”. In Reed, Ishmael. (ed.) MultiAmerica: Essays on Cultural War and Cultural Peace. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books: 325-327.

LOUSLEY, Cheryl. 2004. “‘Hosanna Da, Our Home on Natives’ Land’: Environmental Justice and Democracy in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. Essays on Canadian Writing 81: 17-44.

MATCHIE, Thomas and Brett LARSON. 1996. “Coyote Fixes the World: The Power of Myth in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. North Dakota Quarterly 63 (2): 153-168.

MORRISON, Toni. 1992. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard U.P.

OWENS, Louis. 1992. Other Destinies: Understanding the American Indian Novel. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

SAID, Edward W. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

SLAPKAUSKAITE, Ruta. 2006. “Reading Irony as a Cultural Dialogue in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water”. Acta Litteraria Comparativa: Cultural Intertexts 2: 46-55.

SMITH, Jeanne Rosier. 1997. Writing Tricksters: Mythic Gambols in American Ethnic Literature. Berkeley, L.A.: University of California Press.

SPIVAK, Gayatry C. 1988. “Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiography”. In In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Routledge: 197-221.

TURBIDE, Diane. 1993. “A Literary Trickster: Thomas King Conjures up Comic Worlds”. Maclean’s (3 May): 43-44.

VIZENOR, Gerald. 1993. “Trickster Discourse: Comic Holotropes and Language Games”. In Vizenor, Gerald (ed.). Narrative Chance: Postmodern Discourse on Native American Indian Literatures. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press: 189-211.

—. (1984) 1995. The People Named the Chippewa: Narrative Stories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

—. (1993) 2001. “Chapter One: Postindian Warriors”. Manifest Manners: Postindian Warriors of Survivance. In Leitch, Vincent B. (ed.) The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Co. 1977-1986.

Downloads

Published

2010-04-01

How to Cite

Ibarrola-Armendariz, A. (2010). Native American Humor as Resistance: Breaking Identity Moulds in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 42, 67–90. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20109416

Issue

Section

ARTICLES: Literature, film and cultural studies