‘Feedback Means the World to Me’: Constructing Proximity in Canon Compliant Fanfiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.202410256Keywords:
proximity, interpersonality, fanfiction, fan studies, genreAbstract
This paper examines the linguistic strategies used to create proximity within the online fandom community. The study applies close reading techniques to analyse three works of fanfiction belonging to a canon-compliant subgenre. It explores how authors from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds establish a relationship with their readers by demonstrating their affiliation with fandom (proximity of membership) and dedication to the source material (proximity of commitment). To investigate these techniques, the study employs the model of proximity defined by Hyland (2010), extended by the findings of Suau-Jiménez (2019, 2020). The analysis includes both the main text and the metatext, revealing similarities in the techniques used by the authors to establish proximity through organisation, argument, credibility, stance and engagement.
Display downloads
References
Bawarshi, S. A. & Reiff, J. M. (2010). Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. Parlor Press; The WAC Clearinghouse. https://wac.colostate.edu/books/referenceguides/bawarshi-reiff/
Bacon-Smith, C. (1992). Enterprising women: television fandom and the creation of popular myth. University Of Pennsylvania Press.
Bennett, L. (2014). Tracing Textual Poachers: Reflections on the development of fan studies and digital fandom. The Journal of Fandom Studies, 2(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.2.1.5_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.2.1.5_1
Black, R. W. (2005). Access and Affiliation: The Literacy and Composition Practices of English-Language Learners in an Online Fanfiction Community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.49.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.2.4
Black, R. W. (2006). Language, Culture, and Identity in Online Fanfiction. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.2304/ELEA.2006.3.2.170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.170
Bronwen, T. (2011). What Is Fanfiction and Why Are People Saying Such Nice Things about It?? Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 3, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5250/storyworlds.3.2011.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5250/storyworlds.3.2011.0001
De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press.
Gray, J. (2003). New audiences, new textualities: Anti-Fans and non-fans. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877903006001004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877903006001004
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold
Harris, Ch. (1998). A Sociology of Television Fandom. In Ch. Harris & A. A. Creskill (Eds.), Theorizing Fandom: Fans, Subculture and Identity. Hampton Press (NJ).
Hellekson, K., & Busse, K. (2006). Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet: New Essays. McFarland & Company.
Hellekson, K. (2009). A Fannish Field of Value: Online Fan Gift Culture. Cinema Journal, 48(4), 113–118. doi:10.1353/cj.0.0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.0.0140
Hellekson, K., & Busse, K. (2014). The Fan Fiction Studies Reader. University Of Iowa Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20p58d6
Hills, M. (2002). Fan cultures. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361337
Hills, M. (2005). Patterns of Surprise. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(7), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204273169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204273169
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 116–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003
Hyland, K. (2012). Discipline: Proximity and positioning. In Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse (pp. 22–44). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009406512.005
Hyland, K., & Zou, J. H. (2021). “I believe the findings are fascinating”: stance in Three-Minute Theses, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100973
Jamison, A. (2013). Fic: Why Fanfiction is Taking Over the World. Ben-Bella Books.
Jancovich, M. (2002). CULT FICTIONS: CULT MOVIES, SUBCULTURAL CAPITAL AND THE PRODUCTION OF CULTURAL DISTINCTIONS. Cultural Studies, 16(2), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380110107607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380110107607
Kobus, A. (2018). FANDOM. Fanowskie modele odbioru. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Leppänen, S. (2012). Linguistic and generic hybridity in web writing: The case of fan fiction. In M. Sebba, S. Mahootian & C. Jonsson (Eds.), Language Mixing and Code-Switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-Language Written Discourse (pp. 233-254). Routledge.
Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing: Reader (pp. 21–29). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
McLuhan, M. & Nevitt, B. (1972). Take Today: The Executive as Dropout. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oberc, A. (2015). I Write. You Write. They Write. The Literary Works of Fandom as Factor in Integrating the Community. In P. Gärdenfors, W. Powers, J. Płuciennik, & M. Wróblewski (Eds.), On-line/Off-line. Between Text and Experience Writing as a Lifestyle (pp. 63-74). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://dspace.uni.lodz.pl/xmlui/handle/11089/32890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-821-9.05
Pugh, S. (2005). The Democratic Genre: Fan Fiction in a Literary Context. Bridgend, Wales: Seren Books.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Silberstein-Bamford, F. (2023). The “Fanfic Lens”: Fan Writing’s Impact on Media Consumption. Participations. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 19(2), 145-164. https://www.participations.org/19-02-08-silberstein-bamford.pdf
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szpatowicz, M. (2021), „Cierpienie i pocieszenie w slashu”. Rana. Litera-tura – Doświadczenie – Tożsamość, 1(3), 1-15, https://doi.org/10.31261/Rana.2021.3.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31261/Rana.2021.3.09
Tereszkiewicz, A., & Szczyrbak, M. (2022). “We Poles are pill poppers”: Proximity in Polish medical popularisation videos on YouTube. Ibérica, 44, 207–238. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.44.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.44.207
Toffler, A. (1980) The Third Wave. Collins.
Walker, A. (2022, August 29) "Where do memes come from? The top platforms from 2010-2022" https://knowyourmeme.com/editorials/insights/where-do-memes-come-from-the-top-platforms-from-2010-2022?utm_source=freshmail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter-08092022-prosty-jezyk
Wereda, W., & Pînzaru, F. (2023). The phenomenon of prosumption in the digital transformation time. Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania, 18(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.37055/nsz/176543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37055/nsz/176543
Van Steenhuyse, V. (2011). The Writing and Reading of Fan Fiction and Transformation Theory. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1691
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Katarzyna Matlas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2024-05-07
Published 2024-12-16
