Construcciones existenciales del inglés actual y su pragmática. Hacia una categorización integrada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.200110534Palabras clave:
construcción del there, función comunicativa, prospectiva, restrospectiva, contextoResumen
Este artículo presenta la pragmática de las construcciones de allí (en adelante, PCs) como su principal objeto de análisis. Pretende proporcionar las etiquetas para una posible clasificación de las PCs según sus funciones comunicativas en sus contextos de aparición. Se hace una distinción básica entre funciones prospectivas y retrospectivas de las PCs, cuya función más básica se considera la de ayudar en el progreso y desarrollo informativo del texto. Se proponen aquí un total de diez etiquetas para otras tantas funciones pragmáticas. Aunque no es definitiva ni está totalmente desarrollada, sino abierta a reformulaciones y a nuevas investigaciones, la tipología propuesta puede ser la base de una metodología eficaz. Se espera que aborde un aspecto de las PCs que parece haber recibido menos atención de la merecida.
Descargas
Citas
AARTS, Jan. 1991. "Intuition-based and Observation-based Grammars”. In Aijmer, Karin and Bengt Altenberg (eds.). English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London and New York: Longman: 44-63.
ABBOTT, Barbara. 1992. “Definiteness, Existentials, and the 'List' Interpretation”. Working Papers in Linguistics, 40 (SALT II Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory): 1-16.
—. 1993. “A Pragmatic Account of the Definiteness Effect in Existential Sentences”. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 39-55.
—. 1997. "Definiteness in Existentials”. Language 73: 103-108.
BAKER, Mona, GILLIAN Francis and Elena TOGNINI-BONELLI. (eds.). 1993. Text And Technology. In Honour Of John Sinclair. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
BIBER, Douglas, S. JOHANSSON, G. LEECH, S. CONRAD and E. FINNEGAN. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
BIELEC, Dana. Polish: An Essential Grammar. London/New York: Routledge.
—. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Studies in Language Companion Series 40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
BOLINGER, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. English Language Series 11. London: Longman.
BREIVIK, Leiv Egil. 1977. "A Note on the Genesis of Existential There". English Studies, 58: 334-348.
—. 1979. “Review Article on The English existential, by Lyle Jenkins (1975) and THERE Sentences in English: A Relational Study Based on a Corpus of Written Texts, by P. Erdmann (1976)". English Studies 60: 216-230.
—. 1981. “On the Interpretation of Existential There". Language 57 (1): 1-25.
—. 1983. Existential There. A Synchronic and Diachronic Study. Studia Anglistica Norvegica. Bergen: Department of English, University of Bergen.
BUTLER, Christopher. 1985. Statistics in Linguistics. Oxford: B. Blackwell LTD.
CRYSTAL, David. 1997. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. (4th edition). London: Blackwell Publishers.
DAVIDSE, Kristin. 1992a. “A Semiotic Approach to Relational Clauses”. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 6: 99-131.
—. 1992b. “Existential Constructions: A Systemic Perspective”. Leuvense Bijdragen, 81:71-99.
—. 1997. “Cardinal versus Enumerative Existential Constructions” preprint n. 160. Leuven Belgium: Departement Linguistiek, Blijde-Inkomstraat.
DIK, Simon C. 1978. Functional Grammar. North-Holland Linguistic Series 37. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
—. 1980. Studies in Functional Grammar. London: Academic Press.
—. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I. Ed. Kess Hengeveld. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
DOWNING, Angela and Philip LOCKE. 1992. A University Course in English Grammar. London: Prentice Hall.
FOX, Barbara A. and Sandra A. THOMPSON. 1990. “A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses in English Conversation”. Language 66 (2): 297-316.
GELUYKENS, Ronald. 1991. “Information Flow in English Conversation. A New Approach to the Given-New Distinction”. In Ventola, Eija (ed.). Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 55 Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 141-167.
GIVÓN, Talmi. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
GODDARD, Cliff and Anna WIERZBICKA. 1994. Semantic and Lexical Universals. Studies in Language Companion Series 25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. 1994 (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
HANNAY, Michael. 1985. English Existentials in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht-Holland: Foris Publications.
HOLMBACK, Heather. 1984. “An Interpretative Solution to the Definiteness Effect Problem”. Linguistic Analysis 13 (3): 195-215.
HUDDLESTON, Rodney. 1971. The Sentence in Written English. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
—. 1988. English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge: Cambridge U.
JESPERSEN, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
LAKOFF, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago U. P
LIPINSKA-GRZEGOREK, Maria. 1973. “Existential Sentences in English and Polish”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 5 (1-2): 87-103.
LYONS, John. 1967. “A Note on Possessive, Existential and Locative Sentences”. Foundations of Language. International Journal of Language and Philosophy 3: 390-396.
MILSARK, Gary. 1977. “Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English”. Linguistic Analysis 3 (1): 1-29.
—. 1979a, Existential Sentences in English. (Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in September, 1974). Indiana University Linguistics Club.
—. 1979b. “The English Existential. By Lyle Jenkins. 1975". Studies in Language 3 (1):99-108.
—. 1990. “Existential Sentences: Their Structure and Meaning. By Michael Lumsden. 1988". Language 66 (4): 850-853.
PRINCE, Ellen F. "Function of Existential Presupposition in Discourse”. CLS 14: 362-376.
QUIRK, Randolph, Sidney GREENBAUM, Geoffrey LEECH and Jan SVARTVIK. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.
RANDO, Emily and Donna Jo NAPOLI. 1978. “Definites in There-sentences”. Language 54: 301-313.
RYBARKIEWICZ, Wlodzimierz. 1977. “On the Nature of the Concepts ‘Given’ and ‘New’ in Linguistic Analysis” in Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 9: 77-85.
SIEWIERSKA, Anna. 1991. Functional Grammar. London/New York: Routledge.
SOBKOWIAK, Wlodzimierz. 1993. “Unmarked-before-marked as a Freezing Principle”. Language and Speech 36 (4): 393-414.
STUBBS, Michael. 1993. “British Traditions in Text Analysis - From Firth to Sinclair”. In Baker, Mona et al. (eds.): 1-36.
TOGNINI-BONELLI, Elena. 1993. “Interpretative Nodes in Discourse- Actual and Actually”. In Baker, Mona et al. (eds.): 193-212.
WARD, Gregory and Betty J. BIRNER. 1994, “English There-sentences and Information Status”. Proceedings of the Israeli Association of Theoretical Linguistics Ninth Annual Conference and Workshop on Discourse.
—. 1995. “Definiteness and the English Existential”. Language 71: 722-741.
—. 1997. “Response to Abbott”. Language 73: 109-112.
—. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Studies in Language Companion Series 18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
—. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
—. 1996. Semantics. Primes and Universals. Oxford/New York: Oxford U. P.
ZIV, Yael. 1982a. "Another Look at Definites in Existentials”. Journal of Linguistics 18: 73-88.
—. 1982b. “Getting More Mileage out of Existentials in English”. Linguistics 20: 747-762.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2001 Ana E. Martínez Insua
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
