Traversing the Fantasy in the Twenty-First Century Bildungsroman: The Ontological Quest and Lacanian Psychoanalysis in David Mitchell's number9dream
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20148782Keywords:
David Mitchell, Twenty-first century Bildungsroman, Lacanian psychoanalysis, Fantasy, Ontological questAbstract
David Mitchell’s number9dream (2001) has been received as a ‘postmodern Bildungsroman’ that redefines the coming-of-age narrative through a postmodern frame. Useful as this definition may be in distinguishing Mitchell’s novel from the traditional coming-of-age tale, most readings building on the notion of his fiction as ‘postmodern’ have tended to misconstrue or underestimate important aspects of his art. In this article I argue this point using the theories of Jacques Lacan, Slavoj Žižek, and Brian McHale. Taking my cue from McHale’s understanding of postmodernist aesthetics hitherto not applied to number9dream, I analyze the novel from the point of view of its ‘ontological’ (as opposed to ‘epistemological’) dominant, defined here as the way in which number9dream prioritizes questions about the ‘being’ of its protagonist’s world over those of how this world can be ‘known’. Crucial in this context is fantasy, which Mitchell understands not as an escapist mode but, akin to Lacan and Žižek, as reality’s ‘support’. Rather than being subordinated to the ‘reality principle’, fantasy acts in number9dream as a driving and transforming agent in the protagonist’s progress toward maturity: a process that entails the realization that the world he inhabits, rather than being ever-present, always emerges through his own ‘fantasmatic’ activities.
Downloads
References
ADISESHIAH, Siân, and Rupert hildyard. (eds.) 2013. Twenty-First Century Fiction: What Happens Now. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
BAYER, Gerd. 2014. “The Ethics of Breaking up the Family Romance”. In Onega, S. and Ganteau, J-M. (eds.) Contemporary Trauma Narratives: Liminality and the Ethics of Form. New York: Routledge: 120-136.
BOULTER, Jonathan. 2011. Melancholy and the Archive: Trauma, History and Memory in the Contemporary Novel. New York: Continuum.
BOXALL, Peter. 2013. Twenty-First-Century Fiction: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
BRADFORD, Richard. 2007. The Novel Now: Contemporary British Fiction. Oxford: Blackwell.
CHILDS, Peter, and James Green. 2011. “The Novels in Nine Parts”. In Dillon, S. (ed.): 25-47.
DILLON, Sarah. (ed.) 2011. David Mitchell: Critical Essays. Canterbury: Gylphi.
HIGGINGS, Dick. 1978. A Dialectic of Centuries: Notes Towards a Theory of the New Arts. New York and Barton, Vermont: Printed Editions.
HUTCHEON, Linda. 1987. “Beginning to Theorize Postmodernism”. Textual Practice (1): 10-31.
—. 2002. The Politics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
IYER, Pico. 2007. “The Time 100: David Mitchell”. Time (May 3). <http://content.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1595326_1595332_1616691,00.html>. Accessed February 21, 2014.
LACAN, Jacques. 1997. Seminar VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-1960. Trans. by D. Porter. Ed. by J.-A. Miller. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
—. 1998. Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Trans. by A.Sheridan. Ed. by J.A. Miller. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
MCFARLANE, Robert. 2001. “When Blade Runnermeets Jack Kerouac”. Observer (March 11).<http://www.theguardian.com/books/2001/mar/11/fiction.davidmitchell>. Accessed February 23, 2014.
MCHALE, Brian. 1987. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Methuen.
MITCHELL, David. 2001. number9dream. London: Sceptre.
—. 2003. Number9dream. New York: Random House.
MORETTI, Franco. 1987. The Way of the World. London: Verso.
ROE, Andrew. 2002. “Daydreaming in Tokyo”. San Francisco Chronicle (September 28).<http://www.sfgate.com/books/article/Daydreaming-in-Tokyo-David-Mitchell-s-2871757.php>. Accessed September 5, 2013.
ROTHBERG, Michael. 2000. Traumatic Realism: The Demands of Holocaust Representation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
SIMPSON, Kathryn. 2011. “‘Or something like that:’ Coming of Age in number9dream”. In Dillon, S. (ed.): 49-76.
ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. 2010. “Avatar: Return of the Natives”. New Statesman (March 4). <http://www.newstatesman.com/film/2010/03/avatarreality-love-couple-sex/>. Accessed February 25, 2014.
—. 1999. “Is it Possible to Traverse the Fantasy in Cyberspace?” In Wright, E. and E. Wright. (eds.) The Žižek Reader. Oxford: Blackwell: 102-124.
—. 2003. Tarrying With the Negative. Durham, North Carolina: Duke U.P.
—. “The Cyberspace Real: Cyberspace Between Perversion and Trauma”. <http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/thecyberspace-real/>. Accessed February 12, 2014.
—. 2001. The Fright of Real Tears: Krzysztof Kie´slowski Between Theory and Post-Theory. London: BFI Publishing.
—. 2000. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Adina Sorian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.