Los Resultados Positivos, Negativos y Neutrales de la Adaptación Diseñada en el Entorno Construido
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2020154821Palabras clave:
Adaptación, Capacidad de Adaptación, Resiliencia, Innovación, Diseño, Cambio ClimáticoResumen
Este artículo postula que el diseño de intervenciones de adaptación climática está alineado en proceso con la difusión social de la innovación. Como tal, la innovación es fundamentalmente una diferenciación del status quo a través de prueba y error que está diseñada para fallar y eludir, tanto como está diseñada para aislar y transformar. Mediante ciclos de creación y fracaso, el capital social, financiero y ecológico se reorganiza dentro de un ciclo adaptativo, como un proceso que simultáneamente ofrece la promesa de un conjunto de resultados potenciales subjetivamente más equitativo y más explotador. Durante mucho tiempo, la adaptación no se ha considerado ni buena ni mala; es simplemente un proceso social de aprendizaje y compensaciones del que algunos pueden beneficiarse y otros pueden soportar la carga Este artículo cuestiona la retórica de que las actividades de resiliencia y adaptación producen universalmente resultados positivos para la sociedad y ecología. Por el contrario, solo en un escenario óptimo tales actividades producirían un resultado neto positivo de un futuro más equitativo y justo. En algunos casos, las adaptaciones diseñadas pueden ser fracasos para algunos y éxitos para otros.
Descargas
Citas
Adger, Neil; Arnell, Nigel; Tompkins, Emma, “Successful Adaptation to Climate Change Across Scales,” Global Environmental Change, n° 15(2)(2005): 77-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
Baregheh, Anihita; Rowley, Jennifer; Sambrook, Sally, “Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation,” Management Decision, n° 47(8)(2009): 1323-1339. DOI: 10.1108/00251740910984578
Barnett, Jon; Evans, Louisa; Gross, Catherine; et al., “From barriers to limits to climate change adaptation: path dependency and the speed of change,” Ecology and Society, n° 20(3)(2015). doi: 10.5751/ES-07698-20030
Blühdorn, Ingolfur, “An offer one might prefer to refuse: The systems theoretical legacy of Niklas Luhmann,” European Journal of Social Theory, n° 3(3)(2000): 339-354.
Brousseau, Eric; Garrouste, Pierre; Raynaud, Emmanuel, “Institutional Changes: Alternative Theories and Consequences for Institutional Design,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, n° 79(1)(2011): 3-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.024
Davidson, Julie; Jacobson, Chris; Lyth, Anna; et al., “Interrogating resilience: toward a typology to improve its operationalization,” Ecology and Society, N° 21(2)(2016): Art 27. doi:10.5751/ES-08450-210227
Fedele, Giacomo; Donatti, Camilla; Harvey, Celia; Hannah, Lee; Hole, David, “Limited use of transformative adaptation in response to social-ecological shifts driven by climate change,” Ecology and Society, n°25(1)(2020): Art. 25. doi:10.5751/ES-11381-250125
Fisher, Susannah; Dodman, David. “Urban climate change adaptation as social learning: Exploring the process and politics,” Environmental Policy and Governance, n° 29(3)(2019): 235-247. doi: 10.1002/eet.1851
Frederickson, George; Johnson, Gary; Wood, Curtis, The Adapted City, Armonk, NY: ME Sharp, 2004.
Gersonius, Barry, The Resilience Approach to Climate Adaptation Applied for Flood Risk, Rotterdam: CRC Press/Balkema, 2012.
Giddens, Anthony, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Keenan, Jesse M., “Material and Social Construction: A Framework for the Adaptation of Buildings,”
Enquiry: Journal of Architectural Research, n° 11(1)(2014): 18-32. doi: 10.17831/enq:arcc.v11i1.271
Keenan, Jesse M.; Hill, Thomas; Gumber, Anurag, “Climate gentrification: from theory to empiricism in Miami-Dade County, Florida,” Environmental Research Letters, n° 13(5)(2018): 054001. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32/meta
Kurth, Margaret; Keenan, Jesse M.; Sasani, Meherdad; et al., “Defining Resilience for the Building Industry for the U.S.,” Building Research & Information, n° 47(4)(2018): 480-492. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2018.1452489
Lewis, Orion; Steinmo, Sven, “How Institutions Evolve: Evolutionary Theory and Institutional Change,” Polity, n° 44(3)(2012): 314-339. doi: 10.1057/pol.2012.1
Mach, Katharine; Kraan, Caroline; Hino, Miyuki; et al., “Managed retreat through voluntary buyouts of flood-prone properties,” Science Advances, n° 5(10)(2019): eaax8995. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax8995
Maxwell, Kelly; Julius, Susan; Grambsch, Anne; Kosmal, Ann.; Larson, Libby; Sonti, Nancy, “Built Environment, Urban Systems, and Cities.” In Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Global Change Research Program, 2018. doi:10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH10
Olsson, Lennart; Jerneck, Anne; Thoren, Henrik; et al., “Why resilience is unappealing to social science: Theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience,” Science Advances, n° 1(4)(2015): e1400217. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
Owusu-Daaku, Kwame N., “(Mal) Adaptation opportunism: when other interests take over stated or intended climate change adaptation objectives (and their unintended effects),” Local Environment, n° 23(9)(2018): 934-951. doi:10.1080/13549839.2018.1505836
Rogers, Everett, Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2010.
Rogers, Everett; Medina, Una; Rivera, Mario; et al., “Complex Adaptive Systems and the Diffusion of Innovations,” The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, n° 10(3)(2005): Art. 29. doi: 10.1.1.130.8047
Runhaar, Hens; Wilk, Bettina; Persson, Åsa; et al., “Mainstreaming climate adaptation: taking stock about “what works” from empirical research worldwide,” Regional Environmental Change, n°18(4): 1201-1210. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1259-5
Sarzynski, Andrea. “Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities,” Urban Climate, n° 14(2015): 52-67. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.08.002
Shepsle, Kenneth, “Rational Choice Institutionalism,” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford Handbooks Online, 2008. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0002
Siders, A. R.; Hin, Miyuki; Mach, Katherine, “The case for strategic and managed climate retreat,” Science, n° 365(6455)(2019): 761-763. doi:10.1126/science.aax8346
Uittenbroek, Caroline; Janssen-Jansen, Leonie; Runhaar, Hens, “Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies” Regional Environmental Change, n° 13(2)(2014): 399-411. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0348-8
Wejs, Anaj; Harvold, Kjell; Larsen, Sanne; et al., “Legitimacy Building in Weak Institutional Settings: Climate Change Adaptation at Local Level in Denmark and Norway,” Environmental Politics, n° 23(3)(2014): 490-508. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.854967
Zilberman, David; Zhao, Jinhua; Heiman, Amir, “Adoption versus adaptation, with emphasis on climate change.” Annual Review of Resource Economics, n° 4(1)(2012): 27-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-083110-115954
