The King’s and Queen's Tomb in Ahmedabad: Cartographies of contested heritage precincts

Authors

  • Víctor Cano Ciborro Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Mansi Shah CEPT University, Ahmedabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2021165099

Keywords:

Ahmedabad, Unesco, Heritage, conflict, bodies, Cartography

Abstract

Numerous historical monuments in the Indian city of Ahmedabad, such as the King’s and Queen’s tomb, are immersed in a complex web of conflict. These are places where, beyond the building itself, we find the presence of inhabitants with very different notions of what the concept of heritage means, so that dispute and resistance are more than guaranteed. The article looks at these extremely heterogeneous and controversial territories through a method —“narrative cartographies”— capable of making the space, its history and social strata visible from an ethnographic point of view. A method that brings to the surface the tensions and disputes between citizens who are marginalised by the institutional power, but who share a spatial reality that is usually ignored and made invisible. In this way, the cartographic analysis presented in both the King’s Tomb and the Queen’s Tomb redefines the way in which these places can be understood and studied, suppressing a dominant and/or imposing vision for one that is much more sensitive to the voices of
the inhabitants. The aim is to disseminate a process that can help reveal different narratives that lead to heritage practices that are as inclusive as emancipatory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Víctor Cano Ciborro, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Víctor Cano Ciborro is an Architect and holds a Master in Advanced Architectural Design by ETSAM in Madrid (Spain) where he is currently finishing his PhD dissertation. From 2012 to 2016 he was Teaching Assistant at ETSAM and in 2015 was Principal Tutor at the Summer School developed at Architectural Association -AA– in London. In 2017 was Tutor in different International Workshops in West Europe (Ukraine and Kosovo). In 2018 was Teaching & Research Fellow at CEPT-University in Ahmedabad (India) where he developed the “Rebel Bodies Rebel Cities” vertical studio. In 2019 he has been Visiting Researcher at University of California, Berkeley. And in 2021 is teaching again at CEPT-University as Visiting Faculty. Victor’s work and research have been internationally recognized like in the Venice Biennial of Architecture and Urbanism 2018 and published in different international magazines. Also, he has been invited to different lectures in the USA, South America and Europe. Currently, he leads the Radical Spatialities Group “Subaltern Architecture” and is associate researcher about cartographies as tool to address the informal settlements in Quito (Ecuador).

Mansi Shah, CEPT University, Ahmedabad, India

Mansi Shah is an architect- urban designer. She is currently based in Ahmedabad and is teaching in Bachelors of Urban Design, as Adjunct Assistant Professor in Faculty of Planning at CEPT University. With teaching, she works on her independent research projects on different subjects under ‘Ahmedabad Mapping Project’ (an initiative to gather information about the city and represent through maps and cartography), ‘City Water Walks’ and ‘Pocket- garden’. She has also co-authored the book ‘Prathaa: Kath-khuni architecture of Himachal Pradesh’. She has a keen interest in pedagogy and research and has carried out several publications, workshops and exhibitions to explore innovative ways to support her research and learning for students. 

References

Cano Ciborro, Víctor. Narrative cartographies: Architectures from the sensitive regime of resistance.PhD Dissertation, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2021.

Cano Ciborro, Víctor and Shah, Mansi. UG BUD Studio 3 | REBEL BODIES REBEL CITIES Designing Sensitive Urban Devices In Contested Spaces | CEPT - Portfolio. [online] Portfolio.cept.ac.in.

Available at: <https://portfolio.cept.ac.in/2018/M/fp/rebel-bodies-rebel-cities-designing-sensitive-urban-devices-in-contested-spaces-4130-d-monsoon-2018> [Accessed 19 March 2021].

Cobarrubias, Sebastián, and Pickles, John. “Spacing Movements: The Turn to Cartographies and Mapping Practices in Contemporary Social Movements”, in The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary

Perspectives, editado por Barney Warf y Santa Arias, 36-58. Routledge, 2009.

Corner, James. “The Agency of Mapping Speculation, Critique and Invention”. Mappings / Ed. by Denis Cosgrove., 1999.

Desai, Renu. “Entrepreneurial Urbanism in the Time of Hindutva: City Imaginering, Place Marketing, and Citizenship in Ahmedabad”, in Urbanizing Citizenship. Contested Spaces in Indian Cities, 31-57. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2011.

Desai, Renu and Romola, Sanyal. “Introduction”, in Urbanizing Citizenship. Contested Spaces in Holston, James. “Foreword”, in Urbanizing Citizenship. Contested Spaces in Indian Cities. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2012.

Kaijima, Momoyo; Stalder, Laurent and Iseki, Yu. Architectural Ethnography. Japan: TOTO, 2018.

Nanda, Vivek. “Urbanism, Tradition, and Continuity in Ahmedabad”. Mimar: Architecture in Development, n.o 38 (1991): 26-36.

Roy, Ananya. “Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35.2 (marzo de 2011): 223-38.

Sen, Jai. “The Unintended City”. Seminar #500 (april 2001).

Shah, Mansi and Shah, Kruti. UG BUD Studio 3 | Occupied Graphic Anatomy Of Everyday Urban | CEPT - Portfolio. [online] Portfolio.cept.ac.in. Available at: <https://portfolio.cept.ac.in/2019/M/fp/occupied-graphic-anatomy-of-everyday-urban-ur2010-monsoon-2019> [Accessed 19 March 2021].

Somol, Robert E. “Dummy Text, or The Diagrammatic Basis of Contemporary Architecture”, in Diagram diaries, 6-25. New York: Universe Published, 1999.

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Historic City of Ahmadabad”. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1551/ [Accessed 2 February 2021].

Downloads

Published

2021-09-13

How to Cite

Cano Ciborro, V., & Shah, M. (2021). The King’s and Queen’s Tomb in Ahmedabad: Cartographies of contested heritage precincts. ZARCH. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Architecture and Urbanism, (16), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2021165099