Master Plan for the Loughborough University of Technology: ¿Un campus infinito?

Autores/as

  • Débora Domingo-Calabuig Universitat Politècnica de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2020144296

Palabras clave:

planificación de campus, universidad de Loughborough, Arup Associates, mat-building, obra abierta

Resumen

El Master Plan for the Loughborough University of Technology es un documento de 143 páginas que recoge el trabajo emprendido por la institución para convertirse en una universidad, beneficiándose así de las políticas educativas derivadas del informe Robbins de 1963 en Gran Bretaña. Arup Associates firmó en 1966 una propuesta cuya característica principal es su adscripción a una estrategia de retícula infinita y de proyecto sistematizado. Los diferentes diagramas y esquemas de crecimiento representan la síntesis geométrica de unas reglas compositivas y constructivas: tres retículas se superponen para producir un dibujo germen al que se suma un patrón de crecimiento para su extensión territorial. En aras de una flexibilidad y adaptabilidad, el proyecto intenta rehuir la obsolescencia arquitectónica mediante la consecución de una “unidad espacial universal”. Se establece entonces una “disciplina” cuya definición resulta ser una sucesión de limitaciones. A través de la reconstrucción del proceso de proyecto para la universidad de Loughborough, las múltiples acepciones del concepto de límite quedan retratadas en paralelo a su idea de campus continuo e infinito. Un estricto orden interno, una lectura intencionadamente abierta del territorio y una estandarización constructiva producen una suerte de agotamiento visual del conjunto que podría entenderse como un límite de naturaleza espacial.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Débora Domingo-Calabuig, Universitat Politècnica de València

Débora Domingo-Calabuig (Valencia, 1972) has been an architect since 1997, after studying in the School of Architecture of the Universitat Politécnica de València (UPV) and the School of Architecture of Paris-La Défense, and a PhD architect since 2005 through the UPV. She joined the Department of Architectural Projects in the UPV in 2000 where she is currently a PhD associate professor. Between 2012 and 2016, she was the assistant director for research for the School of Architecture in Valencia and is a member of Research Academy of the European Association for Architectural Education. Her research is focused on the social consideration of architecture and urbanism during the 60s and 70s. She has developed alongside professor Raúl Castellanos Gómez a research project on the mat-building whose results have been published in Boletín Académico Contemporáneo (2011), Proyecto, progreso, arquitectura (2011, 2012), The Architectural Review (2013), DEARQ (2015), and arq: Architectural Research Quarterly (2016). Recently, this research has led her to the re-compiling of the post-war university campuses since some case studies are perfectly in line with the definition of “open work” by Umberto Eco. dedoca@pra.upv.es

Citas

Abbott, F.A. 1966. The Design of Electrical and Other Services in Educational Buildings. Arup Journal 2 (May): 2–8.

Allen, Stan. 2001. Mat-Urbanism: The Thick 2-D. In Sarkis 2001, 118–26.

Armstrong, David. 1966. Model Making at Arups. Arup Journal 5 (November): 2–9.

Arup. 2016. The Arup Journal 1966-2016.

Arup Associates. 1967. Building for Science. Architectural Design 4 (April): 160–70.

_____. 1968. Loughborough University of Technology, Grande-Bretagne. Architecture d’Aujourd’hui 137: 53–6.

_____. 1996. Master Plan for the Loughborough University of Technology. Loughborough: University of Technology.

Beloff, Michael. 1968. The Plateglass Universities. London: Secker & Warburg.

Brawne, Michael. 1967. University Planning and Design: A Symposium. London: Lund Humphries for the Architectural Association.

_____. 1970. The New Universities. The Architectural Review 147, no. 878.

Bullock, Nicholas; Dickens, Peter; Steadman, Philip. 1968. A Theoretical Basis for University Planning. Cambridge: Center for Land Use and Built Form Studies.

_____. 1970. Activities Space and Location. The Architectural Review 147, no. 878: 299–308.

Carlo, Giancarlo De. 1968. Pianificazione e Disegno Delle Università. Roma: Edizioni Universitarie Italiane.

Colquhoun, Alan. 1981. Centraal Beheer. In Essays in Architectural Criticism: Modern Architecture and Historical Change, 95-109. Cambridge, Massachussetts: The MIT Press.

Cortés, Juan Antonio. 2013. Historia de la retícula en el siglo XX: De La Estructura Domi-No a Los Comienzos de Los Años Setenta. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, Secretariado de Publicaciones e Intercambio Editorial.

Domingo Calabuig, Débora and Raúl Castellanos Gómez. 2011. Urdimbre y Trama: El Caso de La Universidad Libre de Berlín. Proyecto, Progreso, Arquitectura 4: 30–43.

Domingo Calabuig, Débora; Castellanos Gómez, Raúl; Ábalos Ramos, Ana. 2013. The Strategies of Mat-Building. Architectural Review CCXXXIV, no. 1398: 83–91.

Dowson, Philip. 1966. The Architect’s Approach to Architecture. Arup Journal 2 (May): 9–19.

Jockusch, Peter and Walter Dunkl. 1974. University Campus Design. Architectural Design 11: 703–17.

Lizondo Sevilla, Laura. 2017. Mies’s Opaque Cube: The Electric Utilities Pavilion at the 1929 Barcelona International Exposition. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 76, no. 2: 197–217.

Lucan, Jacques. 2009. Composition, non-composition : architecture et théories, XIXe-XXe siècles. Lausanne : Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.

Martin, Leslie. 1975. The grid as generator. In Urban Space and Structures, ed. Leslie Martin and Lionel March, 6–27. Cambridge University Press.

Muthesius, Stefan. 2000. The Postwar University. Utopianist Campus and College. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Robbins, Lionel. 1963. The Report of the Committee Appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/robbins/robbins1963.html (accessed November 4, 2019).

Sarkis, Hashim. 2001. Case: Le Corbusier’s Venice Hospital and the Mat Building Revival. Munich, London, New York: Prestel Verlag.

Sarkis, Hashim. 2001. The Paradoxical Promise of Flexibility. In Sarkis 2001, 80–89.

Smithson, Alison. 1962. Team 10 Primer. Architectural Design 32 (December): 559–601.

_____. 1964. The Work of Team 10. Architectural Design 34 (August): 373–82.

_____. 1974. How to recognize and read mat-building. Architectural Design 9 (December): 573–90.

Steadman, Philip. 2016. Research in Architecture and Urban Studies at Cambridge in the 1960s and 1970s: What Really Happened. The Journal of Architecture 21, no. 2 (February): 291–306.

Thomas, David. 1967. Loughborough University of Technology; Growth Change and Grid Disciplines. Arup Journal 6 (September): 7–15.

Woods, Shadrach. 1960. Stem. Architectural Design 5 (May): 181.

_____. 1962. Web. Le Carré Bleu 3: 2–5.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-11-03

Cómo citar

Domingo-Calabuig, D. (2020). Master Plan for the Loughborough University of Technology: ¿Un campus infinito?. ZARCH. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Architecture and Urbanism, (14), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2020144296

Número

Núm. 14 (2020): Cartografías del límite

Sección

Artículos temáticos