El valor de la historia. Estudio de alternativas curriculares en Secundaria (2): aprender sobre la alteridad y la naturaleza humana a través de la empatía o toma de perspectiva histórica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_clio/clio.2019458655Palabras clave:
empatía histórica, toma de perspectiva histórica, pensamiento histórico, diseño curricular, Enseñanza SecundariaResumen
Partiendo de una revisión del debate académico sobre la empatía o toma de perspectiva histórica, se ofrece una propuesta de currículo de historia para Secundaria centrado en esta dimensión del pensamiento histórico. Este segundo artículo de la serie “El valor de la historia” indaga cómo podría ser un currículo en el que los estudiantes se enfrenten al reto de explicar por qué los seres humanos actuaron como lo hicieron en determinadas circunstancias y en el que exploren lo que creían, pensaban o sentían para hacer lo que hicieron. Se analizan algunas de las claves fundamentales que deberían tenerse en cuenta en el diseño y se argumenta el valor de dar esta orientación curricular a la asignatura partiendo de la importancia de desarrollar el sentido de alteridad y de expandir su comprensión de lo que significa ser humano.
Descargas
Citas
Ashby, R. & Lee, P. J. (1987). Children’s concepts of empathy and understanding in history. En C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62-88). Londres: The Falmer Press.
Bain, R. B. (2005). “They Thought the World Was Flat?”. Applying the Principles of How People Learn in Teaching High School History. En M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn. History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom (pp. 175-213). Washington: The National Academies Press.
Barton, K. C. (1996). Did the Devil Just Run Out of Juice? Historical Perspective-Taking among Elementary Students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New York, April 8-12, 1996.
Barton, K. C. (2012). Agency, choice and historical action: How history teaching can help students think about democratic decision making. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 7, 131-142. doi:10.1386/ctl.7.2.131_1
Barton, K. C. & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching History for the Common Good. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Berti, A. E., Baldin, I. & Toneatti, L. (2009). Empathy in history. Understanding a past institution (ordeal) in children and young adults when description and rationale are provided. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 278-288.
Blumer, H. (1962). Society as Symbolic Interaction. En A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human Behavior and Social Process: An Interactionist Approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism; Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Boddington, T. (1980). Empathy and the teaching of history. British Journal of Educational Studies, 28(1), 13-19.
Botella, L. y Feixas, G. (2008). Teoría de los constructos personales: aplicaciones a la práctica psicológica. Barcelona: FPCEE Blanquerna.
Brooks, S. (2011). Historical Empathy as Perspective Recognition and Care in One Secondary Social Studies Classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(2), 166-202. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473452
Chapman, A. (2009). Taking The Perspective of The Other Seriously? The Importance of HIstorical Argument. Euroclio Bulletin, 28, 13-18.
Collingwood, R. G. (1946 / 1993). The Idea of History (Revised Edition with Lectures 1926-1928 edited with an introduction by Jan Van der Dussen). Oxford - Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Coltham, J. & Fines, J. (1971). Educational Objetives for the Study of History. Londres: Historical Association.
Davison, M. (2012). Teaching historial empathy and the 1915 Gallipoli campaign. En M. Harcourt & M. Sheehan (Eds.), History matters: teaching and learning history in New Zealand secondary schools in the 21st century (pp. 11-31). Wellington: NZCER Press.
De Leur, T., Van Boxtel, C. & Wilschut, A. (2017). ‘I Saw Angry People and Broken Statues’: Historical Empathy in Secondary History Education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1-22. doi:10.1080/00071005.2017.1291902
Duby, G. (1995). Año 1000, año 2000. La huella de nuestros miedos. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andrés Bello.
Eco, U. (2000). Tratado de Semiótica General (5.ª ed.). Barcelona: Lumen.
Endacott, J. L. (2010). Reconsidering Affective Engagement in Historical Empathy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 6-47. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473415
Endacott, J. L. & Brooks, S. (2013). An Updated Theoretical and Practical Model for Promoting Historical Empathy. Social Studies Research & Practice, 8(1), 41-58.
Foster, S. (1999). Using Historical Empathy to Excite Students about the Study of History: Can You Empathize with Neville Chamberlain? The Social Studies, 90(1), 18-24. doi: 10.1080/00377999909602386
Gadamer, H.-G. (1979). The Problem of Historical Consciousness. En P. Rabinow & W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive Social Science. A Reader (pp. 103-160). Berkeley, Los Angeles - Londres: University of California Press.
Gehlbach, H. (2004). A New Perspective on Perspective Taking: A Multidimensional Approach to Conceptualizing an Aptitude. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 207-234.
Guillén, M. (2016). Un viaje al siglo XVI a partir de los casos de un corsario y un bandolero. Una experiencia de empatía histórica en Secundaria. Clío. History and History Teaching, 42.
Hale, C. L. & Delia, J. G. (1976). Cognitive complexity and social perspective‐taking. Communication Monographs, 43(3), 195-203. doi:10.1080/03637757609375932
Hartmann, U. & Hasselhorn, M. (2008). Historical perspective taking: A standardized measure for an aspect of students’ historical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 264-270.
Holland, T. (2003). Rubicon. The Triumph and Tragedy of the Roman Republic. Londres: Anchor Books.
Huijgen, T., van Boxtel, C., van de Grift, W. & Holthuis, P. (2016). Toward Historical Perspective Taking: Students’ Reasoning When Contextualizing the Actions of People in the Past. Theory & Research in Social Education, 00, 1-35. doi:10.1080/00933104.2016.1208597
Johnson, D. W. (1975). Cooperativeness and social perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 241-244.
Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. 2 vols. Nueva York: Norton.
Knight, P. (1989). Empathy: Concept, Confusion and Consequences in a National Curriculum. Oxford Review of Education, 15(1), 41-53.
Langer, J. (1969). Theories of Development. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lee, P. (2011). History education and historical literacy. En I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in History Teaching (pp. 63-72). Londres - Nueva York: Routledge.
Lee, P. (2011). Historical Literacy and Transformative History. En L. Perikleous & D. Shemilt (Eds.), The Future of the Past: Why History Education Matters, (pp. 129-168). Nicosia: Association for Historical Dialogue and Research - Kailas Printers.
Lee, P. (1992). History in schools: Aims, purposes and approaches. A reply to John White. En P. Lee, J. Slater, P. Walsh & J. White, The Aims of School History: The National Curriculum and Beyond (pp. 20-34). Londres: Tufnell Press.
Lee, P. J. (2005). Putting Principles into Practice: Understanding History. En M.S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Eds.), How Students Learn: history, mathematics and science in the classroom (pp. 31-77), Washington: National Academy Press.
Lee, P. J. y Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, perspective taking, and rational understanding. En O. L. Davis Jr., E. A. Yaeger & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 21-50). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Lee, P. J., Dickinson, A. & Ashby, R. (1997). “Just another emperor”. Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research. Explanation and understanding in learning History, 27(3), 233-244.
Lee, P. J. & Shemilt, D. (2011). The concept that dares not speak its name: Should empathy come out of the closet? Teaching History, 143, 39-49.
Leeuw-Roord, J. (2009). Yearning for Yesterday: Effords of History Professionals in Europe at designing Meaningful and Effective School History Curricula. En L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National History Standards. The Problem of the Canon and the Future of Teaching History (pp. 73-95). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Lévesque, S. (2008). Thinking historically: educating students for the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press Incorporated.
Lévesque, S. (2011). What It Means to Think Historically. En P. Clark (Ed.), New possibilities for the past: shaping history education in Canada (pp. 115-138). Vancouver: UBC Press, The University of British Columbia.
Levstik, L. S. (2001). Crossing the Empty Spaces: Perspectiva Taking in New Zealand Adolescents’ Understanding of National History. En O. L. J. Davis, E. A. Yeager & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies (pp. 69-96). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Lipman, M. & Sharp, A. M. (2002). La filosofía en el aula. Madrid: Ediciones de la Torre (orig.: Temple University Press, 1980).
Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perikleous, L. (2011). Why Did They Treat Their Children Like This?: A Case Study of 9-12 year-old Greek Cypriot Students’ Ideas of Historical Empathy. En L. Perikleous & D. Shemilt (Eds.), The Future of the Past: Why History Education Matters. Nicosia, Cyprus: The Association for Historical Dialogue and Research (AHDR).
Piaget, J. (1955). The Language and Thought of the Child. Nueva York: World Publishing.
Widow, J. L. (2009). ¿Por qué César cruzó el Rubicón? En Ensayo sobre la relación entre libertad e historia Un magisterio vital: historia, educación y cultura. Homenaje a Héctor Herrera Cajas (pp. 77-92). Santiago de Chile: Editorial de la Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez de Santiago de Chile.
Wilschut, A. & Schiphorst, K. (2019). ‘One has to take leave as much as possible of one’s own standards and values’: Improving and measuring historical empathy and perspective reconstruction. History Education Research Journal, 16(1), 74-87. doi:10.18546/HERJ.16.1.07
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Yeager, E. A. & Doppen, F. H. (2001). Teaching and Learning Multiple Perspectives in the Use of the Atomic Bomb: Historical Empathy in the Secondary Classroom. En O. L. Davis Jr., E. A. Yaeger & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies (pp. 97-114). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Yeager, E. A. & Foster, S. J. (2001). The role of empathy in the development of historical understanding. En O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in the Social Studies (pp. 13-20). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Javier Paricio Royo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Este trabajo tiene una licencia internacional Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Los derechos de autor siguen siendo propiedad de los autores. Se debe obtener permiso de los autores para la reimpresión y el contenido de JoS no se puede copiar con fines comerciales. JoS, sin embargo, se reserva el derecho de reproducción futura de artículos en copia impresa, formato de documento portátil (.pdf) o ediciones HTML de JoS.
